From: Jonathan W. <co...@co...> - 2005-05-24 14:09:18
|
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 09:31:05PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > I would prefer to use is_null() for both getting and setting the value: > > version 1.7 version 1.9 version 2.0 > GET: bool is_null() const -> bool ism_bNull() -> bool is_null() Oops, there are "const" qualifiers missing there ... obviously I don't plan to make the functions non-const. jon -- "UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things." - Doug Gwyn |