Re: [MUTE] Supernodes in Ants & Mute

[closedshop <clo...@gm...>]

Psychofreak wrote:

> closedshop wrote:
>
>>
>> found this:
>> http://www.zeropaid.com/bbs/attachment.php?attachmentid=11074
>>
> STOP LYING ! you didn't "find" this, you've posted it yourself! 


long version:  Found this reference to the mentioned issue.
Tsafa is rigth, we should think about a supernode structure for manet 
based protocols.

This Architecture, as re-design of the "Trelawney-protocol" mixes 
ID-2-ID Transfers with IP-2-IP transfers.
The G2 protocol with Hubs (Supernodes) is used.
Tsafa was told, that is is not a mixture of 2. and 3. generation 
NETWORK, but tu use an OWN G2 PROTOCOL (so not the shareaza network, 
which was implecated by trelawney protocol design for a hybrid app). 
This is not connected to any  second generation media filesharing 
network or app.
The first 1-2 hops of  ants/mute are done with ants protocol. The last 
1-2 hops are done with ants/mute protocol as well.
In the middle all hops are done by g2 protocol with  supernodes 
structure and it is clear, that not client shared media is stnt to a 
supernode, but ONLY REMOTE shared media.
So all is pretty safe, you have 1-2 hops plus 1-2 hops and then the long 
distance flight to the ants hill /colony with the g2 protocol and with 
supernodes/hubs.

This would work pretty good. within 5 hops at maximum you can transfer 
the chunk and find in 2-4 hubs the whole media and can search like 
morpheus neo net DHT the horizont of 6 Million users in a short time, 
and find everything.

It also provides a new gnutella - gnutellants or gmuteella - and is the 
future.

So just update gnutella with this structured protocol, that 1-2 hops at 
the beginning and 1-2 hops at the end of the proxy chain allis done by a 
selfproxying network and the rest by worlds famous G2 network.

:-)