Thread: [mpls-linux-general] Need Clarification on ldp-struct-txt
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
jleu
|
From: Paresh P. <par...@ya...> - 2002-08-29 10:20:28
|
Hi all,
I have small querry regarding MPLS-LDP implementaion.
In ldp-portable-0.110.tar.gz In the directory doc
there is file ldp_struct.txt that shows various
elements in LDP implementations and relations between
them as shown below.
-----
| |
.------| Adj |
/ | |
---------- / -----
| In Label |-------. 1:1 |
---------- N:M / |
| \ / 1:N
1:N \ / |
| --------- --------
---------- N:1 | | N:1 | | 1:1|
|Out label |<----->| Session |<----->| Entity |<----|
---------- | | | | |
--------- --------
| |
N:M 1:1
| |
------ -----
| | | |
| Addr | | If |
| | | |
------ -----
1. I am not clear about what is 'Entity' in this
diagram.
2. There is little confusion about mappings. Why is
in:out label mapping is 1:n and not n:m.
Regards,
Paresh
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
http://finance.yahoo.com
|
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2002-08-29 11:58:45
|
See below: On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 03:20:25AM -0700, Paresh Patil wrote: > Hi all, > > I have small querry regarding MPLS-LDP implementaion. > > In ldp-portable-0.110.tar.gz In the directory doc > there is file ldp_struct.txt that shows various > elements in LDP implementations and relations between > them as shown below. > ----- > | | > .------| Adj | > / | | > ---------- / ----- > | In Label |-------. 1:1 | > ---------- N:M / | > | \ / 1:N > 1:N \ / | > | --------- -------- > ---------- N:1 | | N:1 | | 1:1| > |Out label |<----->| Session |<----->| Entity |<----| > ---------- | | | | | > --------- -------- > | | > N:M 1:1 > | | > ------ ----- > | | | | > | Addr | | If | > | | | | > ------ ----- > > 1. I am not clear about what is 'Entity' in this > diagram. In the ldp-mib an interface and a remote peer have a common base called an entity. They each have some specific config, but most of their LDP information and operation is derived from the entity. > 2. There is little confusion about mappings. Why is > in:out label mapping is 1:n and not n:m. Actually that should be n:1 multiple inlabels can point to the same outlabel (label merge), but not vice versa (that would be multipoint LSPs which are not supported by MPLS (officially atleast) or LDP. > > Regards, > Paresh > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes > http://finance.yahoo.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general -- James R. Leu |
|
From: Wayne W. S. <ww...@ho...> - 2002-09-08 03:09:14
|
Hi all, I have four identical PCs running kernel 2.4.8 and I have successfully patched and compiled mpls-linux-0.996 into the kernel on all of them. However I realize that the FEC binding command only works on one of the PCs. For the other PCs, after issuing the command, will not result in a new entry in /proc/net/mpls_fec. So in the current setup, I can only setup one LSP (because FEC binding only works in one PC). I am suspecting that I might have accidentially unchecked some kernel options on those 3 PCs that are required for this mpls package. Any suggestions on what to do? Thaks, -Wayne |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2002-09-08 14:43:10
|
First suggestion is to get mpls-linux-1.170 ;-) mpls-linux-1.1x changes the way FEC bindings are done. So it's not even worth going through trouble shooting the problem your having on mpls-linux-0.996. Jim On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 11:09:06PM -0400, Wayne W. Szeto wrote: > Hi all, > > I have four identical PCs running kernel 2.4.8 and I have successfully > patched and compiled mpls-linux-0.996 into the kernel on all of them. > However I realize that the FEC binding command only works on one of the > PCs. For the other PCs, after issuing the command, will not result in a > new entry in /proc/net/mpls_fec. So in the current setup, I can only > setup one LSP (because FEC binding only works in one PC). I am suspecting > that I might have accidentially unchecked some kernel options on those 3 > PCs that are required for this mpls package. Any suggestions on what to > do? > > Thaks, > -Wayne > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old > cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! > https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general -- James R. Leu |