mpls-linux-general

[mpls-linux-general] Problems Patching zebra with LDP

[Josef P. <jo...@pe...>]

Hi to all,

I'm sorry I'm flooding the mailing list a little bit, but i really come not
into the next step the zebra implementation of LDP:

I want to use ZEBRA with the LDP Implemenatiotion of MPLS Linux

I get also some "Hunks Failed" when I patch the zebra-0.94 files with the
ldp_zebra_diff

when I configure and make them I get the following errors:

source='rt_netlink.c' object='rt_netlink.o' libtool=no \
depfile='.deps/rt_netlink.Po' tmpdepfile='.deps/rt_netlink.TPo' \
depmode=gcc3 /bin/sh ../depcomp \
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DSYSCONFDIR=\"/usr/local/etc/\" -DMULTIPATH_NUM=1 -I.
-I. -I.. -I.. -I.. -I../lib    -g -O2 -Wall -c `test -f 'rt_netlink.c' ||
echo './'`rt_netlink.c
rt_netlink.c: In function `netlink_route_change':
rt_netlink.c:678: error: `RTA_LSP' undeclared (first use in this function)
rt_netlink.c:678: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
rt_netlink.c:678: error: for each function it appears in.)
rt_netlink.c: In function `netlink_route_multipath':
rt_netlink.c:1227: error: `RTA_LSP' undeclared (first use in this function)
rt_netlink.c:1318: error: structure has no member named `rtnh_lsp'
rt_netlink.c:1348: error: structure has no member named `rtnh_lsp'
make[2]: *** [rt_netlink.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/zebra-0.94/zebra'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/zebra-0.94'
make: *** [all] Error 2
uml:~/zebra-0.94# 


When I compile the zebra without mpls patching it the make works.

Do you know what I'm doing wrong? or should i wait for the next release of
the ldp-implementation? When will it be released?

I use Debian: sid, uml kernel: 2.6.4


regards josef

Josef Perlinger

Student FH-Sbg/TKS 2000
Tel.: +43 664 4024906
ICQ: 166227595
Email: jo...@pe...



attached my Patching output:

uml:~/zebra-0.94_mpls# patch -p1 < ../ldp-portable/zebra-ldp.diff 
patching file bgpd/bgpd.c
Hunk #2 FAILED at 181.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1758 (offset 60 lines).
1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file bgpd/bgpd.c.rej
patching file bgpd/bgpd.h
patching file bgpd/bgp_vty.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 40 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 401 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 429 (offset 1 line).
patching file bgpd/bgp_zebra.c
patching file config.h.in
patching file configure.ac
Hunk #2 succeeded at 538 (offset 2 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 566 (offset 2 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 788 (offset 2 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 810 (offset 2 lines).
patching file lib/command.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 2153 (offset 73 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 2217 (offset 73 lines).
patching file lib/command.h
patching file lib/if.c
patching file lib/if.h
patching file lib/linklist.h
patching file lib/log.c
patching file lib/log.h
patching file lib/memory.c
patching file lib/memory.h
patching file lib/table.c
patching file lib/table.h
patching file lib/thread.c
patching file lib/vty.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 648 (offset 24 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1058 (offset 24 lines).
patching file lib/zclient.c
patching file lib/zclient.h
patching file lib/zebra.h
patching file Makefile.am
patching file mplsd/create-links
patching file mplsd/delete-links
patching file mplsd/impl_fib.c
patching file mplsd/impl_fib.h
patching file mplsd/impl_ifmgr.c
patching file mplsd/impl_ifmgr.h
patching file mplsd/impl_lock.c
patching file mplsd/impl_mm.c
patching file mplsd/impl_mpls.c
patching file mplsd/impl_mpls.h
patching file mplsd/impl_policy.c
patching file mplsd/impl_socket.c
patching file mplsd/impl_timer.c
patching file mplsd/impl_tree.c
patching file mplsd/l2cc_interface.c
patching file mplsd/l2cc_interface.h
patching file mplsd/ldp.c
patching file mplsd/ldp.h
patching file mplsd/ldp_interface.c
patching file mplsd/ldp_interface.h
patching file mplsd/ldp_remote_peer.c
patching file mplsd/ldp_remote_peer.h
patching file mplsd/ldp_vty.c
patching file mplsd/ldp_vty.h
patching file mplsd/Makefile.am
patching file mplsd/mpls.c
patching file mplsd/mplsd.conf.sample
patching file mplsd/mpls.h
patching file mplsd/mpls_handle_type.h
patching file mplsd/mpls_interface.c
patching file mplsd/mpls_interface.h
patching file mplsd/mpls_main.c
patching file mplsd/mpls_trace.h
patching file mplsd/mpls_vty.c
patching file mplsd/mpls_vty.h
patching file mplsd/mpls_zebra.c
patching file mplsd/mpls_zebra.h
patching file mplsd/rsvpte.c
patching file mplsd/rsvpte.h
patching file mplsd/rsvpte_interface.c
patching file mplsd/rsvpte_interface.h
patching file mplsd/rsvpte_vty.c
patching file mplsd/rsvpte_vty.h
patching file mplsd/static.c
patching file mplsd/static.h
patching file mplsd/static_tunnel.c
patching file mplsd/static_tunnel.h
patching file mplsd/static_vty.c
patching file mplsd/static_vty.h
patching file ospfd/ospfd.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 60 with fuzz 1 (offset 4 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 68 (offset 4 lines).
Hunk #3 FAILED at 84.
1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file ospfd/ospfd.c.rej
patching file ospfd/ospf_lsdb.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 284.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 293.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file ospfd/ospf_lsdb.c.rej
patching file ospfd/ospf_lsdb.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 79.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file ospfd/ospf_lsdb.h.rej
patching file ospfd/ospf_vty.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 3046.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 3080 (offset 21 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 3586 with fuzz 2 (offset -7 lines).
Hunk #4 FAILED at 3614.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 3642.
3 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file ospfd/ospf_vty.c.rej
patching file ospfd/ospf_zebra.c
Hunk #2 succeeded at 167 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1153 (offset -17 lines).
patching file zebra/main.c
patching file zebra/Makefile.am
patching file zebra/redistribute.c
patching file zebra/rib.h
patching file zebra/router-id.c
patching file zebra/router-id.h
patching file zebra/rt_netlink.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 613 (offset 7 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 670 (offset 7 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1222 (offset 9 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 1246 (offset 9 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 1313 (offset 9 lines).
Hunk #6 succeeded at 1342 (offset 9 lines).
patching file zebra/zebra_rib.c
patching file zebra/zebra_vty.c
patching file zebra/zserv.c
patching file zebra/zserv.h
uml:~/zebra-0.94_mpls# 


Josef Perlinger
Student FH-Sbg/TKS 2000
Tel.: +43 664 4024906
ICQ: 166227595
Email: jo...@pe...

Re: [mpls-linux-general] Problems Patching zebra with LDP

[Ramon C. <cas...@in...>]

On Sat, 27 Mar 2004, Josef Perlinger wrote:

> Hi to all,
>
>
> When I compile the zebra without mpls patching it the make works.
>
> Do you know what I'm doing wrong? or should i wait for the next release of
> the ldp-implementation? When will it be released?
>


I don't know a lot about zebra, but make sure that you compile it using
the patched (with mpls-linux) kernel headers. According to your error, the
zebra compilation does not see the RTA_LSP which exists only in MPLS
enabled kernels.

Regards,
R.

Re: [mpls-linux-general] Problems Patching zebra with LDP

[Ramon C. <cas...@in...>]

On Sat, 27 Mar 2004, Josef Perlinger wrote:

>
> I get also some "Hunks Failed" when I patch the zebra-0.94 files with the
> ldp_zebra_diff
>
> when I configure and make them I get the following errors:
>


Let me explain myself. If you compile a C program that has this line:
#include <linux/rtnetlink> in most default configurations gcc is going
to look at /usr/include/linux/rtnetlink.

Nowadays most distributions release a set of 'kernel headers' which are
stable enough, and put into /usr/include. These headers need not match you
current running kernel (All this is a little confusing for some people. In
fact, userspace applications should not include kernel header files but,
unfortunately, some userspace applications need to...

In your case, you may have on one hand your mpls patched kernel and on the
other one a set of kernel headers that have never heard of MPLS. Zebra
looks at them..

A fast workaround would be to modify zebra Makefile so it looks at the
MPLS enabled kernel headers first (something like -I/path/to/mpls/kernel)
do this at your own risk...


>
> When I compile the zebra without mpls patching it the make works.

Sure, because the kernel headers found in /usr/include are enough for
zebra..

Regards,
Ramon

Re: [mpls-linux-general] Problems Patching zebra with LDP

[Bruno J. M. <bj...@me...>]

I had the same problem as you!

I think the error RTA_LSP undeclared happens because you are using kernel
2.6 (maybe that value has differente name in mpls patch for 2.6)...

When I tried to implement ZEBRA+LDP in 2.6 kernel, I also couldn't
compile. But when I implemented it with kernel 2.4, it complied fine and
it worked OK!

Bruno

On Sat, 27 Mar 2004, Josef Perlinger wrote:

> Hi to all,
>
> I'm sorry I'm flooding the mailing list a little bit, but i really come not
> into the next step the zebra implementation of LDP:
>
> I want to use ZEBRA with the LDP Implemenatiotion of MPLS Linux
>
> I get also some "Hunks Failed" when I patch the zebra-0.94 files with the
> ldp_zebra_diff
>
> when I configure and make them I get the following errors:
>
> source='rt_netlink.c' object='rt_netlink.o' libtool=no \
> depfile='.deps/rt_netlink.Po' tmpdepfile='.deps/rt_netlink.TPo' \
> depmode=gcc3 /bin/sh ../depcomp \
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DSYSCONFDIR=\"/usr/local/etc/\" -DMULTIPATH_NUM=1 -I.
> -I. -I.. -I.. -I.. -I../lib    -g -O2 -Wall -c `test -f 'rt_netlink.c' ||
> echo './'`rt_netlink.c
> rt_netlink.c: In function `netlink_route_change':
> rt_netlink.c:678: error: `RTA_LSP' undeclared (first use in this function)
> rt_netlink.c:678: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> rt_netlink.c:678: error: for each function it appears in.)
> rt_netlink.c: In function `netlink_route_multipath':
> rt_netlink.c:1227: error: `RTA_LSP' undeclared (first use in this function)
> rt_netlink.c:1318: error: structure has no member named `rtnh_lsp'
> rt_netlink.c:1348: error: structure has no member named `rtnh_lsp'
> make[2]: *** [rt_netlink.o] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/zebra-0.94/zebra'
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/zebra-0.94'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
> uml:~/zebra-0.94#
>
>
> When I compile the zebra without mpls patching it the make works.
>
> Do you know what I'm doing wrong? or should i wait for the next release of
> the ldp-implementation? When will it be released?
>
> I use Debian: sid, uml kernel: 2.6.4
>
>
> regards josef
>
> Josef Perlinger
>
> Student FH-Sbg/TKS 2000
> Tel.: +43 664 4024906
> ICQ: 166227595
> Email: jo...@pe...
>
>
>
> attached my Patching output:
>
> uml:~/zebra-0.94_mpls# patch -p1 < ../ldp-portable/zebra-ldp.diff
> patching file bgpd/bgpd.c
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 181.
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 1758 (offset 60 lines).
> 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file bgpd/bgpd.c.rej
> patching file bgpd/bgpd.h
> patching file bgpd/bgp_vty.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 40 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 401 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 429 (offset 1 line).
> patching file bgpd/bgp_zebra.c
> patching file config.h.in
> patching file configure.ac
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 538 (offset 2 lines).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 566 (offset 2 lines).
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 788 (offset 2 lines).
> Hunk #5 succeeded at 810 (offset 2 lines).
> patching file lib/command.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 2153 (offset 73 lines).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 2217 (offset 73 lines).
> patching file lib/command.h
> patching file lib/if.c
> patching file lib/if.h
> patching file lib/linklist.h
> patching file lib/log.c
> patching file lib/log.h
> patching file lib/memory.c
> patching file lib/memory.h
> patching file lib/table.c
> patching file lib/table.h
> patching file lib/thread.c
> patching file lib/vty.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 648 (offset 24 lines).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 1058 (offset 24 lines).
> patching file lib/zclient.c
> patching file lib/zclient.h
> patching file lib/zebra.h
> patching file Makefile.am
> patching file mplsd/create-links
> patching file mplsd/delete-links
> patching file mplsd/impl_fib.c
> patching file mplsd/impl_fib.h
> patching file mplsd/impl_ifmgr.c
> patching file mplsd/impl_ifmgr.h
> patching file mplsd/impl_lock.c
> patching file mplsd/impl_mm.c
> patching file mplsd/impl_mpls.c
> patching file mplsd/impl_mpls.h
> patching file mplsd/impl_policy.c
> patching file mplsd/impl_socket.c
> patching file mplsd/impl_timer.c
> patching file mplsd/impl_tree.c
> patching file mplsd/l2cc_interface.c
> patching file mplsd/l2cc_interface.h
> patching file mplsd/ldp.c
> patching file mplsd/ldp.h
> patching file mplsd/ldp_interface.c
> patching file mplsd/ldp_interface.h
> patching file mplsd/ldp_remote_peer.c
> patching file mplsd/ldp_remote_peer.h
> patching file mplsd/ldp_vty.c
> patching file mplsd/ldp_vty.h
> patching file mplsd/Makefile.am
> patching file mplsd/mpls.c
> patching file mplsd/mplsd.conf.sample
> patching file mplsd/mpls.h
> patching file mplsd/mpls_handle_type.h
> patching file mplsd/mpls_interface.c
> patching file mplsd/mpls_interface.h
> patching file mplsd/mpls_main.c
> patching file mplsd/mpls_trace.h
> patching file mplsd/mpls_vty.c
> patching file mplsd/mpls_vty.h
> patching file mplsd/mpls_zebra.c
> patching file mplsd/mpls_zebra.h
> patching file mplsd/rsvpte.c
> patching file mplsd/rsvpte.h
> patching file mplsd/rsvpte_interface.c
> patching file mplsd/rsvpte_interface.h
> patching file mplsd/rsvpte_vty.c
> patching file mplsd/rsvpte_vty.h
> patching file mplsd/static.c
> patching file mplsd/static.h
> patching file mplsd/static_tunnel.c
> patching file mplsd/static_tunnel.h
> patching file mplsd/static_vty.c
> patching file mplsd/static_vty.h
> patching file ospfd/ospfd.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 60 with fuzz 1 (offset 4 lines).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 68 (offset 4 lines).
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 84.
> 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file ospfd/ospfd.c.rej
> patching file ospfd/ospf_lsdb.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 284.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 293.
> 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file ospfd/ospf_lsdb.c.rej
> patching file ospfd/ospf_lsdb.h
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 79.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file ospfd/ospf_lsdb.h.rej
> patching file ospfd/ospf_vty.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 3046.
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 3080 (offset 21 lines).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 3586 with fuzz 2 (offset -7 lines).
> Hunk #4 FAILED at 3614.
> Hunk #5 FAILED at 3642.
> 3 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file ospfd/ospf_vty.c.rej
> patching file ospfd/ospf_zebra.c
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 167 (offset 3 lines).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 1153 (offset -17 lines).
> patching file zebra/main.c
> patching file zebra/Makefile.am
> patching file zebra/redistribute.c
> patching file zebra/rib.h
> patching file zebra/router-id.c
> patching file zebra/router-id.h
> patching file zebra/rt_netlink.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 613 (offset 7 lines).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 670 (offset 7 lines).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 1222 (offset 9 lines).
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 1246 (offset 9 lines).
> Hunk #5 succeeded at 1313 (offset 9 lines).
> Hunk #6 succeeded at 1342 (offset 9 lines).
> patching file zebra/zebra_rib.c
> patching file zebra/zebra_vty.c
> patching file zebra/zserv.c
> patching file zebra/zserv.h
> uml:~/zebra-0.94_mpls#
>
>
> Josef Perlinger
> Student FH-Sbg/TKS 2000
> Tel.: +43 664 4024906
> ICQ: 166227595
> Email: jo...@pe...
>
>
>

AW: [mpls-linux-general] Problems Patching zebra with LDP

[Josef P. <jo...@pe...>]

hmm thx Bruno,=20
but I'll  try to install Zebra + LDP with the kernel 2.6 next week with =
the
kernelheaders of 2.6 ,=20
because I've only managed to compile a 2.6 kernel with mpls support.=20
I got compilation Errors with 2.4 kernel and that's why it is no =
alternative
for me...

I'll keep you informed about my results with 2.6.

josef

-----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Bruno Jorge Marcelino [mailto:bj...@me...]=20
Gesendet: Samstag, 27. M=E4rz 2004 15:52
An: Josef Perlinger
Cc: mpl...@li...
Betreff: Re: [mpls-linux-general] Problems Patching zebra with LDP


I had the same problem as you!

I think the error RTA_LSP undeclared happens because you are using =
kernel
2.6 (maybe that value has differente name in mpls patch for 2.6)...

When I tried to implement ZEBRA+LDP in 2.6 kernel, I also couldn't =
compile.
But when I implemented it with kernel 2.4, it complied fine and it =
worked
OK!

Bruno

On Sat, 27 Mar 2004, Josef Perlinger wrote:

> Hi to all,
>
> I'm sorry I'm flooding the mailing list a little bit, but i really=20
> come not into the next step the zebra implementation of LDP:
>
> I want to use ZEBRA with the LDP Implemenatiotion of MPLS Linux
>
> I get also some "Hunks Failed" when I patch the zebra-0.94 files with=20
> the ldp_zebra_diff
>
> when I configure and make them I get the following errors:
>
> source=3D'rt_netlink.c' object=3D'rt_netlink.o' libtool=3Dno \=20
> depfile=3D'.deps/rt_netlink.Po' tmpdepfile=3D'.deps/rt_netlink.TPo' \
> depmode=3Dgcc3 /bin/sh ../depcomp \
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DSYSCONFDIR=3D\"/usr/local/etc/\" =
-DMULTIPATH_NUM=3D1 -I.
> -I. -I.. -I.. -I.. -I../lib    -g -O2 -Wall -c `test -f 'rt_netlink.c' =
||
> echo './'`rt_netlink.c
> rt_netlink.c: In function `netlink_route_change':
> rt_netlink.c:678: error: `RTA_LSP' undeclared (first use in this=20
> function)
> rt_netlink.c:678: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only=20
> once
> rt_netlink.c:678: error: for each function it appears in.)
> rt_netlink.c: In function `netlink_route_multipath':
> rt_netlink.c:1227: error: `RTA_LSP' undeclared (first use in this=20
> function)
> rt_netlink.c:1318: error: structure has no member named `rtnh_lsp'
> rt_netlink.c:1348: error: structure has no member named `rtnh_lsp'
> make[2]: *** [rt_netlink.o] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/zebra-0.94/zebra'
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/zebra-0.94'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
> uml:~/zebra-0.94#
>
>
> When I compile the zebra without mpls patching it the make works.
>
> Do you know what I'm doing wrong? or should i wait for the next=20
> release of the ldp-implementation? When will it be released?
>
> I use Debian: sid, uml kernel: 2.6.4
>
>
> regards josef
>
> Josef Perlinger
>
> Student FH-Sbg/TKS 2000
> Tel.: +43 664 4024906
> ICQ: 166227595
> Email: jo...@pe...
>
>
>
> attached my Patching output:
>
> uml:~/zebra-0.94_mpls# patch -p1 < ../ldp-portable/zebra-ldp.diff=20
> patching file bgpd/bgpd.c Hunk #2 FAILED at 181.
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 1758 (offset 60 lines).
> 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file bgpd/bgpd.c.rej=20
> patching file bgpd/bgpd.h patching file bgpd/bgp_vty.c Hunk #1=20
> succeeded at 40 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 401 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 429 (offset 1 line).
> patching file bgpd/bgp_zebra.c
> patching file config.h.in
> patching file configure.ac
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 538 (offset 2 lines).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 566 (offset 2 lines).
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 788 (offset 2 lines).
> Hunk #5 succeeded at 810 (offset 2 lines).
> patching file lib/command.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 2153 (offset 73 lines).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 2217 (offset 73 lines).
> patching file lib/command.h
> patching file lib/if.c
> patching file lib/if.h
> patching file lib/linklist.h
> patching file lib/log.c
> patching file lib/log.h
> patching file lib/memory.c
> patching file lib/memory.h
> patching file lib/table.c
> patching file lib/table.h
> patching file lib/thread.c
> patching file lib/vty.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 648 (offset 24 lines).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 1058 (offset 24 lines).
> patching file lib/zclient.c
> patching file lib/zclient.h
> patching file lib/zebra.h
> patching file Makefile.am
> patching file mplsd/create-links
> patching file mplsd/delete-links
> patching file mplsd/impl_fib.c
> patching file mplsd/impl_fib.h
> patching file mplsd/impl_ifmgr.c
> patching file mplsd/impl_ifmgr.h
> patching file mplsd/impl_lock.c
> patching file mplsd/impl_mm.c
> patching file mplsd/impl_mpls.c
> patching file mplsd/impl_mpls.h
> patching file mplsd/impl_policy.c
> patching file mplsd/impl_socket.c
> patching file mplsd/impl_timer.c
> patching file mplsd/impl_tree.c
> patching file mplsd/l2cc_interface.c
> patching file mplsd/l2cc_interface.h
> patching file mplsd/ldp.c
> patching file mplsd/ldp.h
> patching file mplsd/ldp_interface.c
> patching file mplsd/ldp_interface.h
> patching file mplsd/ldp_remote_peer.c
> patching file mplsd/ldp_remote_peer.h
> patching file mplsd/ldp_vty.c
> patching file mplsd/ldp_vty.h
> patching file mplsd/Makefile.am
> patching file mplsd/mpls.c
> patching file mplsd/mplsd.conf.sample
> patching file mplsd/mpls.h
> patching file mplsd/mpls_handle_type.h patching file=20
> mplsd/mpls_interface.c patching file mplsd/mpls_interface.h patching=20
> file mplsd/mpls_main.c patching file mplsd/mpls_trace.h patching file=20
> mplsd/mpls_vty.c patching file mplsd/mpls_vty.h patching file=20
> mplsd/mpls_zebra.c patching file mplsd/mpls_zebra.h patching file=20
> mplsd/rsvpte.c patching file mplsd/rsvpte.h patching file=20
> mplsd/rsvpte_interface.c patching file mplsd/rsvpte_interface.h=20
> patching file mplsd/rsvpte_vty.c patching file mplsd/rsvpte_vty.h=20
> patching file mplsd/static.c patching file mplsd/static.h patching=20
> file mplsd/static_tunnel.c patching file mplsd/static_tunnel.h=20
> patching file mplsd/static_vty.c patching file mplsd/static_vty.h=20
> patching file ospfd/ospfd.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 60 with fuzz 1=20
> (offset 4 lines).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 68 (offset 4 lines).
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 84.
> 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file ospfd/ospfd.c.rej=20
> patching file ospfd/ospf_lsdb.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 284.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 293.
> 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file=20
> ospfd/ospf_lsdb.c.rej patching file ospfd/ospf_lsdb.h Hunk #1 FAILED=20
> at 79.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file ospfd/ospf_lsdb.h.rej =

> patching file ospfd/ospf_vty.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 3046.
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 3080 (offset 21 lines).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 3586 with fuzz 2 (offset -7 lines).
> Hunk #4 FAILED at 3614.
> Hunk #5 FAILED at 3642.
> 3 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file ospfd/ospf_vty.c.rej =

> patching file ospfd/ospf_zebra.c Hunk #2 succeeded at 167 (offset 3=20
> lines).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 1153 (offset -17 lines).
> patching file zebra/main.c
> patching file zebra/Makefile.am
> patching file zebra/redistribute.c
> patching file zebra/rib.h
> patching file zebra/router-id.c
> patching file zebra/router-id.h
> patching file zebra/rt_netlink.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 613 (offset 7 lines).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 670 (offset 7 lines).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 1222 (offset 9 lines).
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 1246 (offset 9 lines).
> Hunk #5 succeeded at 1313 (offset 9 lines).
> Hunk #6 succeeded at 1342 (offset 9 lines).
> patching file zebra/zebra_rib.c
> patching file zebra/zebra_vty.c
> patching file zebra/zserv.c
> patching file zebra/zserv.h
> uml:~/zebra-0.94_mpls#
>
>
> Josef Perlinger
> Student FH-Sbg/TKS 2000
> Tel.: +43 664 4024906
> ICQ: 166227595
> Email: jo...@pe...
>
>
>

Re: [mpls-linux-general] Problems Patching zebra with LDP

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

First off, I've made the conversion to quagga.  So the code in my
personal tree will not work with zebra.

Second, I have not updated the quagga-ldp patch to work with the 2.6
kernels.

Third, I'm in the midst of writting a proper mpls infrastructure for
quagga.  When I update the LDP patch it will be to interact with my
new mpls infrastructure.

On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 08:16:12PM +0100, Josef Perlinger wrote:
> hmm thx Bruno,=20
> but I'll  try to install Zebra + LDP with the kernel 2.6 next week with t=
he
> kernelheaders of 2.6 ,=20
> because I've only managed to compile a 2.6 kernel with mpls support.=20
> I got compilation Errors with 2.4 kernel and that's why it is no alternat=
ive
> for me...
>=20
> I'll keep you informed about my results with 2.6.
>=20
> josef
>=20
> -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Bruno Jorge Marcelino [mailto:bj...@me...]=20
> Gesendet: Samstag, 27. M?rz 2004 15:52
> An: Josef Perlinger
> Cc: mpl...@li...
> Betreff: Re: [mpls-linux-general] Problems Patching zebra with LDP
>=20
>=20
> I had the same problem as you!
>=20
> I think the error RTA_LSP undeclared happens because you are using kernel
> 2.6 (maybe that value has differente name in mpls patch for 2.6)...
>=20
> When I tried to implement ZEBRA+LDP in 2.6 kernel, I also couldn't compil=
e.
> But when I implemented it with kernel 2.4, it complied fine and it worked
> OK!
>=20
> Bruno
>=20
> On Sat, 27 Mar 2004, Josef Perlinger wrote:
>=20
> > Hi to all,
> >
> > I'm sorry I'm flooding the mailing list a little bit, but i really=20
> > come not into the next step the zebra implementation of LDP:
> >
> > I want to use ZEBRA with the LDP Implemenatiotion of MPLS Linux
> >
> > I get also some "Hunks Failed" when I patch the zebra-0.94 files with=
=20
> > the ldp_zebra_diff
> >
> > when I configure and make them I get the following errors:
> >
> > source=3D'rt_netlink.c' object=3D'rt_netlink.o' libtool=3Dno \=20
> > depfile=3D'.deps/rt_netlink.Po' tmpdepfile=3D'.deps/rt_netlink.TPo' \
> > depmode=3Dgcc3 /bin/sh ../depcomp \
> > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DSYSCONFDIR=3D\"/usr/local/etc/\" -DMULTIPATH_NUM=
=3D1 -I.
> > -I. -I.. -I.. -I.. -I../lib    -g -O2 -Wall -c `test -f 'rt_netlink.c' =
||
> > echo './'`rt_netlink.c
> > rt_netlink.c: In function `netlink_route_change':
> > rt_netlink.c:678: error: `RTA_LSP' undeclared (first use in this=20
> > function)
> > rt_netlink.c:678: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only=
=20
> > once
> > rt_netlink.c:678: error: for each function it appears in.)
> > rt_netlink.c: In function `netlink_route_multipath':
> > rt_netlink.c:1227: error: `RTA_LSP' undeclared (first use in this=20
> > function)
> > rt_netlink.c:1318: error: structure has no member named `rtnh_lsp'
> > rt_netlink.c:1348: error: structure has no member named `rtnh_lsp'
> > make[2]: *** [rt_netlink.o] Error 1
> > make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/zebra-0.94/zebra'
> > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/zebra-0.94'
> > make: *** [all] Error 2
> > uml:~/zebra-0.94#
> >
> >
> > When I compile the zebra without mpls patching it the make works.
> >
> > Do you know what I'm doing wrong? or should i wait for the next=20
> > release of the ldp-implementation? When will it be released?
> >
> > I use Debian: sid, uml kernel: 2.6.4
> >
> >
> > regards josef
> >
> > Josef Perlinger
> >
> > Student FH-Sbg/TKS 2000
> > Tel.: +43 664 4024906
> > ICQ: 166227595
> > Email: jo...@pe...
> >
> >
> >
> > attached my Patching output:
> >
> > uml:~/zebra-0.94_mpls# patch -p1 < ../ldp-portable/zebra-ldp.diff=20
> > patching file bgpd/bgpd.c Hunk #2 FAILED at 181.
> > Hunk #3 succeeded at 1758 (offset 60 lines).
> > 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file bgpd/bgpd.c.rej=20
> > patching file bgpd/bgpd.h patching file bgpd/bgp_vty.c Hunk #1=20
> > succeeded at 40 (offset 1 line).
> > Hunk #2 succeeded at 401 (offset 1 line).
> > Hunk #3 succeeded at 429 (offset 1 line).
> > patching file bgpd/bgp_zebra.c
> > patching file config.h.in
> > patching file configure.ac
> > Hunk #2 succeeded at 538 (offset 2 lines).
> > Hunk #3 succeeded at 566 (offset 2 lines).
> > Hunk #4 succeeded at 788 (offset 2 lines).
> > Hunk #5 succeeded at 810 (offset 2 lines).
> > patching file lib/command.c
> > Hunk #1 succeeded at 2153 (offset 73 lines).
> > Hunk #2 succeeded at 2217 (offset 73 lines).
> > patching file lib/command.h
> > patching file lib/if.c
> > patching file lib/if.h
> > patching file lib/linklist.h
> > patching file lib/log.c
> > patching file lib/log.h
> > patching file lib/memory.c
> > patching file lib/memory.h
> > patching file lib/table.c
> > patching file lib/table.h
> > patching file lib/thread.c
> > patching file lib/vty.c
> > Hunk #1 succeeded at 648 (offset 24 lines).
> > Hunk #2 succeeded at 1058 (offset 24 lines).
> > patching file lib/zclient.c
> > patching file lib/zclient.h
> > patching file lib/zebra.h
> > patching file Makefile.am
> > patching file mplsd/create-links
> > patching file mplsd/delete-links
> > patching file mplsd/impl_fib.c
> > patching file mplsd/impl_fib.h
> > patching file mplsd/impl_ifmgr.c
> > patching file mplsd/impl_ifmgr.h
> > patching file mplsd/impl_lock.c
> > patching file mplsd/impl_mm.c
> > patching file mplsd/impl_mpls.c
> > patching file mplsd/impl_mpls.h
> > patching file mplsd/impl_policy.c
> > patching file mplsd/impl_socket.c
> > patching file mplsd/impl_timer.c
> > patching file mplsd/impl_tree.c
> > patching file mplsd/l2cc_interface.c
> > patching file mplsd/l2cc_interface.h
> > patching file mplsd/ldp.c
> > patching file mplsd/ldp.h
> > patching file mplsd/ldp_interface.c
> > patching file mplsd/ldp_interface.h
> > patching file mplsd/ldp_remote_peer.c
> > patching file mplsd/ldp_remote_peer.h
> > patching file mplsd/ldp_vty.c
> > patching file mplsd/ldp_vty.h
> > patching file mplsd/Makefile.am
> > patching file mplsd/mpls.c
> > patching file mplsd/mplsd.conf.sample
> > patching file mplsd/mpls.h
> > patching file mplsd/mpls_handle_type.h patching file=20
> > mplsd/mpls_interface.c patching file mplsd/mpls_interface.h patching=20
> > file mplsd/mpls_main.c patching file mplsd/mpls_trace.h patching file=
=20
> > mplsd/mpls_vty.c patching file mplsd/mpls_vty.h patching file=20
> > mplsd/mpls_zebra.c patching file mplsd/mpls_zebra.h patching file=20
> > mplsd/rsvpte.c patching file mplsd/rsvpte.h patching file=20
> > mplsd/rsvpte_interface.c patching file mplsd/rsvpte_interface.h=20
> > patching file mplsd/rsvpte_vty.c patching file mplsd/rsvpte_vty.h=20
> > patching file mplsd/static.c patching file mplsd/static.h patching=20
> > file mplsd/static_tunnel.c patching file mplsd/static_tunnel.h=20
> > patching file mplsd/static_vty.c patching file mplsd/static_vty.h=20
> > patching file ospfd/ospfd.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 60 with fuzz 1=20
> > (offset 4 lines).
> > Hunk #2 succeeded at 68 (offset 4 lines).
> > Hunk #3 FAILED at 84.
> > 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file ospfd/ospfd.c.rej=20
> > patching file ospfd/ospf_lsdb.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 284.
> > Hunk #2 FAILED at 293.
> > 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file=20
> > ospfd/ospf_lsdb.c.rej patching file ospfd/ospf_lsdb.h Hunk #1 FAILED=20
> > at 79.
> > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file ospfd/ospf_lsdb.h.rej=
=20
> > patching file ospfd/ospf_vty.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 3046.
> > Hunk #2 succeeded at 3080 (offset 21 lines).
> > Hunk #3 succeeded at 3586 with fuzz 2 (offset -7 lines).
> > Hunk #4 FAILED at 3614.
> > Hunk #5 FAILED at 3642.
> > 3 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file ospfd/ospf_vty.c.rej=
=20
> > patching file ospfd/ospf_zebra.c Hunk #2 succeeded at 167 (offset 3=20
> > lines).
> > Hunk #3 succeeded at 1153 (offset -17 lines).
> > patching file zebra/main.c
> > patching file zebra/Makefile.am
> > patching file zebra/redistribute.c
> > patching file zebra/rib.h
> > patching file zebra/router-id.c
> > patching file zebra/router-id.h
> > patching file zebra/rt_netlink.c
> > Hunk #1 succeeded at 613 (offset 7 lines).
> > Hunk #2 succeeded at 670 (offset 7 lines).
> > Hunk #3 succeeded at 1222 (offset 9 lines).
> > Hunk #4 succeeded at 1246 (offset 9 lines).
> > Hunk #5 succeeded at 1313 (offset 9 lines).
> > Hunk #6 succeeded at 1342 (offset 9 lines).
> > patching file zebra/zebra_rib.c
> > patching file zebra/zebra_vty.c
> > patching file zebra/zserv.c
> > patching file zebra/zserv.h
> > uml:~/zebra-0.94_mpls#
> >
> >
> > Josef Perlinger
> > Student FH-Sbg/TKS 2000
> > Tel.: +43 664 4024906
> > ICQ: 166227595
> > Email: jo...@pe...
> >
> >
> >
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
> Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
> GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
> administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id638&op?k
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-linux-general mailing list
> mpl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general

--=20
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...