Thread: [mpls-linux-general] Support CR-LDP or not
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
jleu
From: clz <cui...@ya...> - 2002-02-28 00:24:50
|
SGksYWxsDQogICAgIEluIGEgZm9ybWVyIGVtYWlsLEkga25vdyB0aGF0ICJ0aGUgY3VycmVudCBM RFAtbGludXggaXMgbm90IENELUxEUCIuIFdoYXQgZG9lcyBpdCBtZWFuPw0KSXQgbWVhbnMgdGhl IGxkcCBjb3JlIGRvZXMgbm90IHN1cHBvcnQgQ1ItTERQICxvciB0aGUgcG9ydGFibGUgbGF5ZXIg ZG9lcyBub3Qgc3VwcG9ydCBDUi1MRFA/DQpQbGVhc2UgaGVscCBtZS4NCg0KDQpUaGFua3MgaW4g YWR2YW5jZS4NClJFR0FSRFMNCg0KICAgICAgICAgICAgY3VpbHoNCg0KDQo= _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com |
From: clz <cui...@ya...> - 2002-02-28 00:35:35
|
SGksYWxsDQogICAgIEluIGEgZm9ybWVyIGVtYWlsLEkga25vdyB0aGF0ICJ0aGUgY3VycmVudCBM RFAtbGludXggaXMgbm90IENELUxEUCIuIFdoYXQgZG9lcyBpdCBtZWFuPw0KSXQgbWVhbnMgdGhl IGxkcCBjb3JlIGRvZXMgbm90IHN1cHBvcnQgQ1ItTERQICxvciB0aGUgcG9ydGFibGUgbGF5ZXIg ZG9lcyBub3Qgc3VwcG9ydCBDUi1MRFA/DQpQbGVhc2UgaGVscCBtZS4NCg0KDQpUaGFua3MgaW4g YWR2YW5jZS4NClJFR0FSRFMNCg0KICAgICAgICAgICAgY3VpbHoNCg0KDQoNCg== _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com |
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2002-02-28 01:37:15
|
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 08:32:42AM +0800, clz wrote: > Hi,all > In a former email,I know that "the current LDP-linux is not CD-LDP".= What does it mean? > It means the ldp core does not support CR-LDP ,or the portable layer does= not support CR-LDP? > Please help me. The core doesn't support the CR attributes. Jim >=20 >=20 > Thanks in advance. > REGARDS >=20 > cuilz >=20 >=20 >=20 > =FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF= =FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FC:=18=A2=E6=1A=86= =8A=FF=FCg=AD=CA=8B=AB~=B7=9E=FF&=A1=A2=8F=DC=A2f=9Dv=B7=AC=B1=ABa=B6=DA=FF= =FF=F9=9A=8A_=F2j=1A(=FD=CA&=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF= =FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=E6=A6[=FF=96)= =EE=C7=F8=1E=9D=EA=DA=96f=A2=96)=E0=96+-=9A=99l=FEX=A7=BB=1F=E0zw=ABj_=E5= =8A=CBl=FE=CA.=AD=C7=9F=A2=B8=1E=FEw=AD=86=DBi=B3=FF=FF=96+-=B3=FB(=BA=B7= =1E~=8A=E0{=F9=DE=B7=F9b=B2=DB?=96+-=8Aw=E8=FEje=B3=F9b=9E=EC=FF=81=E9=DE --=20 James R. Leu |
From: Derek Y. <Der...@et...> - 2002-03-12 17:32:22
|
jl...@mi... writes: >The core doesn't support the CR attributes. Hi Jim, Are there any plans for CR-LDP support in a later release? Thanks a lot, /dky ----- Derek Yeung <dk...@uw...> Black holes are where God divided by zero. |
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2002-03-12 17:35:02
|
Yes, in fact in a previsou in carnation of ldp-portable they were supported. As soon as I get a solid zebra/ldp implementation working I will then work to integrate work from someone else (if any exists) or do it myself. Jim On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 12:32:28PM -0500, Derek Yeung wrote: > jl...@mi... writes: > >The core doesn't support the CR attributes. > > > Hi Jim, > > Are there any plans for CR-LDP support in a later release? > > > > Thanks a lot, > /dky > ----- > Derek Yeung <dk...@uw...> > Black holes are where God divided by zero. -- James R. Leu |
From: Giles H. <gi...@pa...> - 2002-03-12 17:39:08
|
Is there any point in doing CR-LDP? I don't know of any SPs deploying CR-LDP, or having plans to do so. For better or worse RSVP-TE won that particular battle... Giles James R. Leu wrote: > Yes, in fact in a previsou in carnation of ldp-portable they were supported. > > As soon as I get a solid zebra/ldp implementation working I will then work > to integrate work from someone else (if any exists) or do it myself. > > Jim > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 12:32:28PM -0500, Derek Yeung wrote: > >>jl...@mi... writes: >> >>>The core doesn't support the CR attributes. >>> >> >>Hi Jim, >> >>Are there any plans for CR-LDP support in a later release? >> >> >> >>Thanks a lot, >>/dky >>----- >>Derek Yeung <dk...@uw...> >>Black holes are where God divided by zero. >> > -- ================================================================= Giles Heron Principal Network Architect PacketExchange Ltd. ph: +44 7880 506185 "if you build it they will yawn" ================================================================= |
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2002-03-12 17:52:58
|
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 05:40:40PM +0000, Giles Heron wrote: > Is there any point in doing CR-LDP? > > I don't know of any SPs deploying CR-LDP, or having plans to do so. > > For better or worse RSVP-TE won that particular battle... Agreed. The only reason for doing it are: -academia still considers it an option -it is such a small amount of work (relativly speeking) -some of the foundations surrounding CR-LDP can be used for RSVP-TE (mostly the api for creating/removing TE tunnels, and the notifications scheme that needs to be in place). Jim > > Giles > > James R. Leu wrote: > > > Yes, in fact in a previsou in carnation of ldp-portable they were supported. > > > > As soon as I get a solid zebra/ldp implementation working I will then work > > to integrate work from someone else (if any exists) or do it myself. > > > > Jim > > > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 12:32:28PM -0500, Derek Yeung wrote: > > > >>jl...@mi... writes: > >> > >>>The core doesn't support the CR attributes. > >>> > >> > >>Hi Jim, > >> > >>Are there any plans for CR-LDP support in a later release? > >> > >> > >> > >>Thanks a lot, > >>/dky > >>----- > >>Derek Yeung <dk...@uw...> > >>Black holes are where God divided by zero. > >> > > > > > -- > ================================================================= > Giles Heron Principal Network Architect PacketExchange Ltd. > ph: +44 7880 506185 "if you build it they will yawn" > ================================================================= -- James R. Leu |
From: Giles H. <gi...@pa...> - 2002-03-12 17:58:33
|
James R. Leu wrote: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 05:40:40PM +0000, Giles Heron wrote: > >>Is there any point in doing CR-LDP? >> >>I don't know of any SPs deploying CR-LDP, or having plans to do so. >> >>For better or worse RSVP-TE won that particular battle... >> > > Agreed. The only reason for doing it are: > -academia still considers it an option good old academia :) I guess it's an intellectual curiosity if nothing else! > -it is such a small amount of work (relativly speeking) okay. > -some of the foundations surrounding CR-LDP can be used for RSVP-TE > (mostly the api for creating/removing TE tunnels, and the notifications > scheme that needs to be in place). makes sense. oh, BTW, where did you get up to with draft-martini support? Would be very happy to give you a hand if required (in my copious spare time ;-) Giles > > Jim > > >>Giles >> >>James R. Leu wrote: >> >> >>>Yes, in fact in a previsou in carnation of ldp-portable they were supported. >>> >>>As soon as I get a solid zebra/ldp implementation working I will then work >>>to integrate work from someone else (if any exists) or do it myself. >>> >>>Jim >>> >>>On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 12:32:28PM -0500, Derek Yeung wrote: >>> >>> >>>>jl...@mi... writes: >>>> >>>> >>>>>The core doesn't support the CR attributes. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>Hi Jim, >>>> >>>>Are there any plans for CR-LDP support in a later release? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Thanks a lot, >>>>/dky >>>>----- >>>>Derek Yeung <dk...@uw...> >>>>Black holes are where God divided by zero. >>>> >>>> >> >>-- >>================================================================= >>Giles Heron Principal Network Architect PacketExchange Ltd. >>ph: +44 7880 506185 "if you build it they will yawn" >>================================================================= >> > -- ================================================================= Giles Heron Principal Network Architect PacketExchange Ltd. ph: +44 7880 506185 "if you build it they will yawn" ================================================================= |
From: Jorge B. [DTI2] <jo...@dt...> - 2002-03-12 18:34:43
|
Hi James et all, Have you made some progress in the zebra/ldp implementation? I've done some test by myself. I've modified ldp-linux and ldp-zebra so that they can work with the new (old¿?:) ioctl interface to mpls 1.128, and with iptables to bind the fecs to the labels. When a ldp_zebra daemon establish a session with another ldp_zebra, there isn't exchange of labels but if the session is established between a ldp_linux and a ldp_zebra all seems to work ok. Have you got any clue about waths happening? My programming skills aren't good enough to look at the code and understand these protocol issues. Thanks in advance, -Jorge ============================================================== Jorge Boncompte - Técnico de sistemas DTI2 - Desarrollo de la Tecnología de las Comunicaciones -------------------------------------------------------------- C/ Abogado Enriquez Barrios, 5 14004 CORDOBA (SPAIN) Tlf: +34 957 761395 / FAX: +34 957 450380 -------------------------------------------------------------- jo...@dt... _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_ http://www.dti2.net ============================================================== - Sin pistachos no hay Rock & Roll... - Without wicker a basket cannot be done. ============================================================== ----- Original Message ----- From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> To: "Derek Yeung" <Der...@et...> Cc: <mpl...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 8:24 PM Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] Support CR-LDP or not > Yes, in fact in a previsou in carnation of ldp-portable they were supported. > > As soon as I get a solid zebra/ldp implementation working I will then work > to integrate work from someone else (if any exists) or do it myself. > > Jim > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 12:32:28PM -0500, Derek Yeung wrote: > > jl...@mi... writes: > > >The core doesn't support the CR attributes. > > > > > > Hi Jim, > > > > Are there any plans for CR-LDP support in a later release? > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot, > > /dky > > ----- > > Derek Yeung <dk...@uw...> > > Black holes are where God divided by zero. > > -- > James R. Leu > > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general > > |