On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 09:26:51PM +0800, Timothy\(???x\) wrote:
> Hi James,
>=20
> I run LDP on two PC. After they establish LDP session, exchange Address m=
essage, than send label mapping message. I show some information about ldp =
under CLI.
>=20
> uml-1# sh ldp database
> 10.1.1.0/24 local binding: label: gen 10000
> 140.123.107.0/24 local binding: label: gen 10001
> 192.168.1.0/24 local binding: label: gen 10002
> 140.123.107.0/24 remote binding: no outlabel lsr: 192.168.1.1:0
> 172.168.1.0/24 remote binding: no outlabel lsr: 192.168.1.1:0
>=20
> It seems LDP doesn't do the remote label binding?? Am I right? Or I miss =
something?=20
As I've said before on this list, ldpd is not ready for general use. It
is still very much in alpha. If you are a developer willing to help, then
ldpd is for you, otherwise don't waste your time.
With that being said, last night I just started looking at the issue you
mention. There must be a bug with matching the nexthop address of the
route to the nexthop session. If you want to track my progress, you should
use p4 to access my development tree.
>=20
> Thanks
>=20
> Timothy
> 2005.05.26
--=20
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...
|
