mpls-linux-general Mailing List for MPLS for Linux (Page 4)
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
jleu
Menu
▾
▴
mpls-linux-general — Mailing list for general discussion about MPLS for Linux
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(26) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 |
Jan
(22) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
(45) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(101) |
Jul
(79) |
Aug
(24) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(71) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2002 |
Jan
(111) |
Feb
(123) |
Mar
(67) |
Apr
(61) |
May
(75) |
Jun
(26) |
Jul
(36) |
Aug
(41) |
Sep
(79) |
Oct
(85) |
Nov
(58) |
Dec
(39) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(61) |
Mar
(80) |
Apr
(56) |
May
(39) |
Jun
(44) |
Jul
(28) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(20) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(14) |
Mar
(68) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(45) |
Jun
(42) |
Jul
(41) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(46) |
Oct
(89) |
Nov
(55) |
Dec
(33) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(74) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(105) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(48) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(22) |
Sep
(33) |
Oct
(28) |
Nov
(29) |
Dec
(81) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(37) |
Feb
(32) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(37) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(28) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(20) |
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(30) |
Dec
(40) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
(24) |
Mar
(65) |
Apr
(69) |
May
(41) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(39) |
Aug
(76) |
Sep
(53) |
Oct
(43) |
Nov
(26) |
Dec
(24) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(19) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(91) |
Apr
(75) |
May
(47) |
Jun
(63) |
Jul
(68) |
Aug
(39) |
Sep
(44) |
Oct
(33) |
Nov
(62) |
Dec
(84) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(55) |
Apr
(63) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(21) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
|
From: Anthony F. <ant...@ef...> - 2010-09-07 08:39:07
|
Hi, I can't get the mpls support in a vanilla linux kernel 2.6.35. I got all the files from http://repo.or.cz/?a=project_list&s=mpls|jleu I applied the patch for 2.6.35 found on the devel list. (fix broken last filename) But there is no updated version of mpls-linux. $ make menuconfig $ grep -i mpls .config CONFIG_MPLS=m CONFIG_MPLS_TUNNEL=m CONFIG_IP_MPLS=m CONFIG_INET6_MPLS=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_MPLS=m But I can't figure out how to fill the blanks. ebtables won't work because of missing mpls-enabled-kernel-side ebtables which is supposed to be in mpls-linux/src but make will fail because of missing autoconf.h then because of not-matching prototypes (net_device vs mpls_interface among others things). Is there any *up-to-date* resource explaining how to get the mpls support from scratch ? Is it working at all ? I'd like to validate the support by testing this: http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/mpls-linux/index.php?title=Examples Is it still relevant ? Anthony. |
|
From: lili l. <lit...@gm...> - 2010-09-03 04:57:15
|
Hi, I have some problems for establishing LSP between two routers. When i type this command mpls xc add ilm_label gen 3000 ilm_labelspace 0 nhlfe_key 0x5, i obtain the following message error : RTNETLINK answers: No such process But i have no problem with previous commands. Does anybody can help me? Thanks. |
|
From: Nuno L. <nun...@gm...> - 2010-08-18 11:32:12
|
Hi guys, I have installed mpls Linux on kernel with the RPM packages for fc10, and I’m using the ldp portable on quagga for mpls signaling. The problem I’m having is related with ldpd and zebra deamon on quagga. LDP sessions are established with success, but when it receives label mappings the zebra deamon crashes (see logs below). Ldpd deamon doesn’t crash but I can see a broken pipe happening. I believe this is caused by zebra crash. Does anyone can help me? Thanks and regards, Nuno ===== Zebra logs ==================================== 2010/08/18 12:53:32 ZEBRA: rib_process: Adding route, select 0x9cfa7f0 2010/08/18 12:53:32 ZEBRA: netlink_route_multipath() (single hop): RTM_NEWROUTE 192.168.2.0/24, type IPv4 2010/08/18 12:53:32 ZEBRA: netlink_route_multipath() (single hop): nexthop via 192.168.1.2 if 4 2010/08/18 12:53:32 ZEBRA: netlink_talk: netlink-cmd type RTM_NEWROUTE(24), seq=7 2010/08/18 12:53:32 ZEBRA: netlink_parse_info: netlink-cmd ACK: type=RTM_NEWROUTE(24), seq=7, pid=0 2010/08/18 12:53:32 ZEBRA: netlink_parse_info: netlink-listen type RTM_NEWROUTE(24), seq=7, pid=4294963198 2010/08/18 12:53:32 ZEBRA: netlink_parse_info: netlink-cmd packet comes from netlink-listen 2010/08/18 12:53:32 ZEBRA: zebra message comes from socket [15] 2010/08/18 12:53:32 ZEBRA: zebra message received [ZEBRA_MPLS_OUT_SEGMENT_ADD] 39 2010/08/18 12:53:32 ZEBRA: netlink_talk: mpls-netlink-nhlfe type (29), seq=1 2010/08/18 12:53:32 ZEBRA: mpls-netlink-nhlfe error: No such file or directory, type=(29), seq=1, pid=0 ZEBRA: Received signal 11 at 1282132412 (si_addr 0x8, PC 0x805b7de); aborting... ================================================´ ======== Ldpd logs ================================ 2010/08/16 21:53:32 LDP: OUT: LABEL MAPPING MSG ***END***: 2010/08/16 21:53:32 LDP: OUT: Mesg size: 27 (201) 2010/08/16 21:53:32 LDP: EXIT: ldp_decode_one_mesg 2010/08/16 21:53:32 LDP: ENTER: ldp_state_machine 2010/08/16 21:53:32 LDP: OUT: FSM: state 5, event 5 2010/08/16 21:53:32 LDP: ENTER: ldp_state_process 2010/08/16 21:53:32 LDP: PRT: ldp_fec_find: 0xc0a80200/24 2010/08/16 21:53:32 LDP: ENTER: ldp_label_mapping_process 2010/08/16 21:53:32 LDP: OUT: Label Mapping Recv from 5.5.5.2:0 for c0a80200/24 2010/08/16 21:53:32 LDP: ENTER: ldp_nexthop_for_fec_session 2010/08/16 21:53:32 LDP: ENTER: ldp_session_for_nexthop: 0x0001 2010/08/16 21:53:32 LDP: PRT: ldp_session_for_nexthop-addr: 0x8fbd8d8 0x8fbd710 0x8fc2e30 2010/08/16 21:53:32 LDP: EXIT: ldp_session_for_nexthop-addr: 0x8fc2e30 2010/08/16 21:53:32 LDP: EXIT: ldp_nexthop_for_fec_session: 0x8fbd8d8 2010/08/16 21:53:32 LDP: buffer_write: write error on fd 8: Broken pipe 2010/08/16 21:53:32 LDP: zclient_send_message: buffer_write failed to zclient fd 8, closing 2010/08/16 21:53:32 LDP: OUT: Out Label Added 2010/08/16 21:53:32 LDP: OUT: Acting as ingress for c0a80200/24 from 5.5.5.2:0 2010/08/16 21:53:32 LDP: ENTER: Prepare_Label_Mapping_Attributes |
|
From: lili l. <lit...@gm...> - 2010-08-12 01:01:26
|
Hi, Thanks, it worked. 2010/8/11 Adrian Popa <adr...@gm...> > Try ip route add 172.16.30.0/24 via 10.0.2.3 mpls 0x02 > > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 2:42 AM, lili lili <lit...@gm...> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Thanks for your response. Could you give me some indications about where >> to find the latest documentation? >> >> Thanks again. >> >> 2010/8/10 Adrian Popa <adr...@gm...> >> >>> The syntax to the ip route command that you are using seems to be rather >>> old. Check the latest examples for the new syntax (I don't remember it right >>> now). >>> >>> Good luck, >>> Adrian >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:28 AM, lili lili <lit...@gm...> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I have installed mpls linux on fedora core 10 with RPM and i have some >>>> problem for esthabishing LSP manually. I have no problem with "mpls >>>> nhlfe...." but when i type " ip route add 10.0.5.1/32 via 10.0.5.1 >>>> spec_nh 0x8847 0x2mpls" i have this error message : .*Either "to" is >>>> duplicate or "spec_nh" is a garbage*. >>>> Does any one can help me? >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by >>>> >>>> Make an app they can't live without >>>> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge >>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> mpls-linux-general mailing list >>>> mpl...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.net email is sponsored by >> >> Make an app they can't live without >> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev >> _______________________________________________ >> mpls-linux-general mailing list >> mpl...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general >> >> > |
|
From: Youssef M. <uce...@gm...> - 2010-08-11 12:19:21
|
Salam Hi Dear Colleague, can you help me to do an implimenting ipv6 in mpls-unix Thank you in advance for your collaboration. Sincerely Yours Youssef MOUSSAID |
|
From: Adrian P. <adr...@gm...> - 2010-08-11 05:31:01
|
Try ip route add 172.16.30.0/24 via 10.0.2.3 mpls 0x02 On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 2:42 AM, lili lili <lit...@gm...> wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for your response. Could you give me some indications about where to > find the latest documentation? > > Thanks again. > > 2010/8/10 Adrian Popa <adr...@gm...> > >> The syntax to the ip route command that you are using seems to be rather >> old. Check the latest examples for the new syntax (I don't remember it right >> now). >> >> Good luck, >> Adrian >> >> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:28 AM, lili lili <lit...@gm...> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have installed mpls linux on fedora core 10 with RPM and i have some >>> problem for esthabishing LSP manually. I have no problem with "mpls >>> nhlfe...." but when i type " ip route add 10.0.5.1/32 via 10.0.5.1 >>> spec_nh 0x8847 0x2mpls" i have this error message : .*Either "to" is >>> duplicate or "spec_nh" is a garbage*. >>> Does any one can help me? >>> Thanks >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by >>> >>> Make an app they can't live without >>> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mpls-linux-general mailing list >>> mpl...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general >>> >>> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by > > Make an app they can't live without > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general > > |
|
From: Jason <css...@gm...> - 2010-08-11 02:17:00
|
Hi,
You can try "ip route help" which gives you the following, or type man
ip route on any linux box.
Usage: ip route { list | flush } SELECTOR
ip route get ADDRESS [ from ADDRESS iif STRING ]
[ oif STRING ] [ tos TOS ]
ip route { add | del | change | append | replace | monitor } ROUTE
SELECTOR := [ root PREFIX ] [ match PREFIX ] [ exact PREFIX ]
[ table TABLE_ID ] [ proto RTPROTO ]
[ type TYPE ] [ scope SCOPE ]
ROUTE := NODE_SPEC [ INFO_SPEC ]
NODE_SPEC := [ TYPE ] PREFIX [ tos TOS ]
[ table TABLE_ID ] [ proto RTPROTO ]
[ scope SCOPE ] [ metric METRIC ]
INFO_SPEC := NH OPTIONS FLAGS [ nexthop NH ]...
NH := [ via ADDRESS ] [ dev STRING ] [ weight NUMBER ] NHFLAGS
OPTIONS := FLAGS [ mtu NUMBER ] [ advmss NUMBER ]
[ rtt TIME ] [ rttvar TIME ] [reordering NUMBER ]
[ window NUMBER] [ cwnd NUMBER ] [ initcwnd NUMBER ]
[ ssthresh NUMBER ] [ realms REALM ] [ src ADDRESS ]
[ rto_min TIME ] [ hoplimit NUMBER ]
TYPE := [ unicast | local | broadcast | multicast | throw |
unreachable | prohibit | blackhole | nat ]
TABLE_ID := [ local | main | default | all | NUMBER ]
SCOPE := [ host | link | global | NUMBER ]
MP_ALGO := { rr | drr | random | wrandom }
NHFLAGS := [ onlink | pervasive ]
RTPROTO := [ kernel | boot | static | NUMBER ]
TIME := NUMBER[s|ms|us|ns|j]
On 08/10/2010 07:42 PM, lili lili wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your response. Could you give me some indications about
> where to find the latest documentation?
>
> Thanks again.
>
> 2010/8/10 Adrian Popa <adrian.popa.gh
> <http://adrian.popa.gh>@gmail.com <http://gmail.com>>
>
> The syntax to the ip route command that you are using seems to be
> rather old. Check the latest examples for the new syntax (I don't
> remember it right now).
> Good luck,
> Adrian
>
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:28 AM, lili lili <lit...@gm...
> <mailto:lit...@gm...>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I have installed mpls linux on fedora core 10 with RPM and i
> have some problem for esthabishing LSP manually. I have no
> problem with "mpls nhlfe...." but when i type " ip route add
> 10.0.5.1/32 <http://10.0.5.1/32> via 10.0.5.1 spec_nh 0x8847
> 0x2mpls" i have this error message : .*Either "to" is
> duplicate or "spec_nh" is a garbage*.
> Does any one can help me?
> Thanks
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by
>
> Make an app they can't live without
> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-linux-general mailing list
> mpl...@li...
> <mailto:mpl...@li...>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by
>
> Make an app they can't live without
> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-linux-general mailing list
> mpl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general
|
|
From: lili l. <lit...@gm...> - 2010-08-10 23:42:26
|
Hi, Thanks for your response. Could you give me some indications about where to find the latest documentation? Thanks again. 2010/8/10 Adrian Popa <adr...@gm...> > The syntax to the ip route command that you are using seems to be rather > old. Check the latest examples for the new syntax (I don't remember it right > now). > Good luck, > Adrian > > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:28 AM, lili lili <lit...@gm...> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have installed mpls linux on fedora core 10 with RPM and i have some >> problem for esthabishing LSP manually. I have no problem with "mpls >> nhlfe...." but when i type " ip route add 10.0.5.1/32 via 10.0.5.1 >> spec_nh 0x8847 0x2mpls" i have this error message : .*Either "to" is >> duplicate or "spec_nh" is a garbage*. >> Does any one can help me? >> Thanks >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.net email is sponsored by >> >> Make an app they can't live without >> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev >> _______________________________________________ >> mpls-linux-general mailing list >> mpl...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general >> >> > |
|
From: Adrian P. <adr...@gm...> - 2010-08-10 05:04:26
|
The syntax to the ip route command that you are using seems to be rather old. Check the latest examples for the new syntax (I don't remember it right now). Good luck, Adrian On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:28 AM, lili lili <lit...@gm...> wrote: > Hi, > > I have installed mpls linux on fedora core 10 with RPM and i have some > problem for esthabishing LSP manually. I have no problem with "mpls > nhlfe...." but when i type " ip route add 10.0.5.1/32 via 10.0.5.1 > spec_nh 0x8847 0x2mpls" i have this error message : .*Either "to" is > duplicate or "spec_nh" is a garbage*. > Does any one can help me? > Thanks > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by > > Make an app they can't live without > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general > > |
|
From: lili l. <lit...@gm...> - 2010-08-10 03:28:49
|
Hi, I have installed mpls linux on fedora core 10 with RPM and i have some problem for esthabishing LSP manually. I have no problem with "mpls nhlfe...." but when i type " ip route add 10.0.5.1/32 via 10.0.5.1 spec_nh 0x8847 0x2mpls" i have this error message : .*Either "to" is duplicate or "spec_nh" is a garbage*. Does any one can help me? Thanks |
|
From: <jl...@mi...> - 2010-07-10 04:50:14
|
Hello all, I know it has been way too long since I've posted to these lists which is one of the reasons why I am posting tonight. Since the birth of my first daughter in 2005, I have not been able to devote any time to maintaining mpls-linux and as a result much of mpls-linux has fell into disrepair. Recently there has been a flurry of mpls-linux activity, so I know there are people out there using/developing mpls-linux. I'd like to find one or two volunteers who will be willing take an active role in maintaining mpls-linux. To me this means: - track changes to mainline kernel and quagga to keep mpls-linux up to date - build releases in timely manor - co-ordinate development efforts on the lists - gather and integrate patches - re-engage with mainline kernel and quagga developers to discuss possible integration of mpls-linux All interested parties should send me a private email. I will wait until July 16th to make any decisions. At that time I hope to send a joint email with the new maintainer(s) providing the details of how mpls-linux will be maintained going forward. -- James R. Leu jl...@mi... |
|
From: Giuseppe B. <giu...@gm...> - 2010-07-09 10:41:58
|
Hi James, hi all is there a manual for iptables patched by mpls? .. I'd like to know if is possibile to use iptables -t mangle -m where the -m option could be match iptables by mpls label or by other mpls property.. i'd like to discriminate iptables by mpls label, is possibile ? Thx to all Giuseppe |
|
From: Maneesh S. <son...@gm...> - 2010-06-28 15:08:05
|
Hello Generally, The Linux kernel have two separate queues for MPLS forwarding (Label Switching) and IP routing. In the case, when both queues (MPLS and IP routing) are full due to congestion, if a new packet come in both queues; then: Which queue will be treated on higher priority? or they will have same priority? -- Thanks and Regards, Maneesh Soni. TELECOM Bretagne 2,rue de la châtaigneraie CS17607 35576 Cesson Sévigné Cedex France Tel: +33 6 46 25 88 13 |
|
From: 亮 崔 <fun...@ya...> - 2010-06-25 09:32:43
|
hi all:
I'm trying to configure bgp. my operation is below:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bgpd# conf t
bgpd(config)# router bgp 1000
bgpd(config-router)# redistribute connected
bgpd(config-router)# Connection closed by foreign host.
[root@localhost bgpd]# ./bgpd
2010/06/25 06:43:23 BGP: BGPd 0.99.6 starting: vty@2605, bgp@179
2010/06/25 06:44:27 BGP: stream_getl: Attempt to get long out of bounds
2010/06/25 06:44:27 BGP: &(struct stream): 0x8162ca8, size: 4096, endp: 24, getp: 24
2010/06/25 06:44:27 BGP: Assertion `0' failed in file stream.c, line 371, function stream_getl
2010/06/25 06:44:27 BGP: No backtrace available on this platform.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm working to set up bgp/mpls vpn, configure bgp(from PE) to redistribute static/connented route (from CE)
I don't know how to resovle this problem thanks for your answer.
regards
e-mail:fun...@ya...
|
|
From: 亮 崔 <fun...@ya...> - 2010-06-25 01:16:21
|
hi , I saw you were talking about a patch for linux-mpls. Meanwhile,I 'm working at mpls/vpn, I really want to vrf patch, thank you very much if you can send me the patch of vrf . Regards, funkliang e-mail:fun...@ya... --- 10年6月16日，周三, mpl...@li... <mpl...@li...> 写道： 发件人: mpl...@li... <mpl...@li...> 主题: mpls-linux-general Digest, Vol 47, Issue 1 收件人: mpl...@li... 日期: 2010年6月16日,周三,下午6:22 Send mpls-linux-general mailing list submissions to mpl...@li... To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to mpl...@li... You can reach the person managing the list at mpl...@li... When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of mpls-linux-general digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: can use mpls-linux support mpls/vpn ? (Leucio Ricci) 2. Re: can use mpls-linux support mpls/vpn ? (Renato Westphal) 3. Re: can use mpls-linux support mpls/vpn ? (Jorge Boncompte [DTI2]) 4. linux-mpls and network namespaces (Mathieu Peresse) 5. Re: linux-mpls and network namespaces (Jorge Boncompte [DTI2]) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 10:38:28 +0200 From: Leucio Ricci <leu...@gm...> Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] can use mpls-linux support mpls/vpn ? To: hmy <hua...@gm...> Cc: mpl...@li... Message-ID: <AAN...@ma...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" hi huang, we've just developed a mpls network with a couple of vpn. mpls-linux can do it...but with some trouble. the main problem is the ldp support that unluckly it's not stable. anyway, after a careful design, you can manually assign the label. for further infos...mail here On 10 May 2010 08:55, hmy <hua...@gm...> wrote: > hello,guys > > I want use the mpls-linux and quagga to support the mpls/vpn > service , but i don't know that mpls-linux can do this ? > please help me. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general > > -- Ricci Leuciantonio -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 12:53:25 -0300 From: Renato Westphal <ren...@gm...> Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] can use mpls-linux support mpls/vpn ? To: Leucio Ricci <leu...@gm...> Cc: mpl...@li... Message-ID: <AAN...@ma...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Some weeks ago I've done some tests with rudimentary VPNs, without VRFs and LDP. I have used: - command "network A.B.C.D/M rd ASN:nn_or_IP-address:nn tag WORD" to distribute vpnv4 routes - extcommunity-list and route-maps to deal with RTs; - extend bgpd daemon to automatically update the nhlfe/ilm/xc tables when receiving bgp_update messages I could interact with Cisco machines (using GNS3) with no problems, but i had to set the LSPs manually and there were no isolation (VRFs). Also, the following RFCs are already implemented on Quagga: - RFC 2842: Capabilities Advertisement with BGP-4 Standards Track; - RFC 2858: Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4 Standards Track; - RFC 4360: BGP Extended Communities Attribute Standards Track; - RFC 3107: Carrying Label Information in BGP-4 Standards Track (there were a label codification bug on the MP_REACH_NLRI attribute that I've already fixed); Unfortunaly, adding VRF support makes things a lot harder, however i'm working on this (extending quagga). There is still a long way to go, but most of the job is already done. Renato. 2010/5/10 Leucio Ricci <leu...@gm...> > hi huang, > we've just developed a mpls network with a couple of vpn. mpls-linux can do > it...but with some trouble. the main problem is the ldp support that > unluckly it's not stable. anyway, after a careful design, you can manually > assign the label. > > for further infos...mail here > > > On 10 May 2010 08:55, hmy <hua...@gm...> wrote: > >> hello,guys >> >> I want use the mpls-linux and quagga to support the mpls/vpn >> service , but i don't know that mpls-linux can do this ? >> please help me. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpls-linux-general mailing list >> mpl...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general >> >> > > > -- > Ricci Leuciantonio > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 10:44:22 +0200 From: "Jorge Boncompte [DTI2]" <jo...@dt...> Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] can use mpls-linux support mpls/vpn ? To: mpl...@li... Message-ID: <4BE...@dt...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 El 10/05/2010 17:53, Renato Westphal escribi?: > Some weeks ago I've done some tests with rudimentary VPNs, without VRFs > and LDP. I have used: > > * command "network A.B.C.D/M rd ASN:nn_or_IP-address:nn tag WORD" to > distribute vpnv4 routes > * extcommunity-list and route-maps to deal with RTs; > * extend bgpd daemon to automatically update the nhlfe/ilm/xc tables > when receiving bgp_update messages > > I could interact with Cisco machines (using GNS3) with no problems, but > i had to set the LSPs manually and there were no isolation (VRFs). > > Also, the following RFCs are already implemented on Quagga: > > * > > RFC 2842: Capabilities Advertisement with BGP-4 Standards Track; > > * > > RFC 2858: Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4 Standards Track; > > * > > RFC 4360: BGP Extended Communities Attribute Standards Track; > > * > > RFC 3107: Carrying Label Information in BGP-4 Standards Track > (there were a label codification bug on the MP_REACH_NLRI > attribute that I've already fixed); > > > Unfortunaly, adding VRF support makes things a lot harder, however i'm > working on this (extending quagga). There is still a long way to go, but > most of the job is already done. > Hi Renato, I have a patch to support full VRF support on zebra daemon. It is almost agnostic about the kernel interface. Currently i have a porting layer to a custom kernel patches I did to implement named network namespaces or current kernels. I have to check if the quagga MPLS patches apply cleanly, they almost did a while ago. I am now cleaning some stuff and I want to publish some code or git tree in a week or two. At some point I had a test network with BGP feeding the VPNV4 prefixes into my kernel, with LDP working, the only thing I needed to have a full working VPN setup was PHP. But it was all a bit ad-hoc. -- ============================================================== Jorge Boncompte - Ingenieria y Gestion de RED DTI2 - Desarrollo de la Tecnologia de las Comunicaciones -------------------------------------------------------------- C/ Abogado Enriquez Barrios, 5 14004 CORDOBA (SPAIN) Tlf: +34 957 761395 / FAX: +34 957 450380 ============================================================== - Sin pistachos no hay Rock & Roll... - Without wicker a basket cannot be made. ============================================================== ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:50:32 +0200 From: Mathieu Peresse <mat...@gm...> Subject: [mpls-linux-general] linux-mpls and network namespaces To: mpl...@li... Message-ID: <AAN...@ma...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hi Jorge and all, I saw you were talking about a patch for linux-mpls that uses named network namespaces, I would like to know if you are still working on the subject and if any patches are available ? I recently posted a (RFC) patch for the ip command that use named network namespaces to configure net namespaces like VRFs , using Eric Biederman's recent set of patches that allows a net namespace to get named, using the filesystem as an "anchor point". Please see: https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/containers/2010-June/024699.html (should maybe have posted to devel, but the most recent post here was talking about this very subject so...) Thanks, -- a+ mathieu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:22:05 +0200 From: "Jorge Boncompte [DTI2]" <jo...@dt...> Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] linux-mpls and network namespaces To: mpl...@li... Message-ID: <4C1...@dt...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 El 14/06/2010 11:50, Mathieu Peresse escribi?: > Hi Jorge and all, > > I saw you were talking about a patch for linux-mpls that uses named > network namespaces, I would like to know if you are still working on the > subject and if any patches are available ? > I recently posted a (RFC) patch for the ip command that use named > network namespaces to configure net namespaces like VRFs , using Eric > Biederman's recent set of patches that allows a net namespace to get > named, using the filesystem as an "anchor point". > > Please > see: https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/containers/2010-June/024699.html > > (should maybe have posted to devel, but the most recent post here was > talking about this very subject so...) I still work on it, i have been using myself some patches from Vivien Chappelier to have ID for netns's that I patched on top to have names too. I did the correspondig patches for ip utility too. We have been using it on our network for some years already. I have a patched Quagga too with support for this infrastructure that I am cleaning up, trying to put it in a git repository and learning git at the same time (so it is going slowly ;). I already knew about Biederman's patches and wanted to take a look at using them for Quagga as they seem to be the ones that are going to be accepted upstream. I don't have too much time now to do research but if you can sent me or point to the needed patches I'll add support in Quagga and publish it. Regards, Jorge -- ============================================================== Jorge Boncompte - Ingenieria y Gestion de RED DTI2 - Desarrollo de la Tecnologia de las Comunicaciones -------------------------------------------------------------- C/ Abogado Enriquez Barrios, 5 14004 CORDOBA (SPAIN) Tlf: +34 957 761395 / FAX: +34 957 450380 ============================================================== - There is only so much duct tape you can put on something before it just becomes a giant ball of duct tape. ============================================================== ------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ mpls-linux-general mailing list mpl...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general End of mpls-linux-general Digest, Vol 47, Issue 1 ************************************************* |
|
From: Jorge B. [DTI2] <jo...@dt...> - 2010-06-16 10:22:21
|
El 14/06/2010 11:50, Mathieu Peresse escribió: > Hi Jorge and all, > > I saw you were talking about a patch for linux-mpls that uses named > network namespaces, I would like to know if you are still working on the > subject and if any patches are available ? > I recently posted a (RFC) patch for the ip command that use named > network namespaces to configure net namespaces like VRFs , using Eric > Biederman's recent set of patches that allows a net namespace to get > named, using the filesystem as an "anchor point". > > Please > see: https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/containers/2010-June/024699.html > > (should maybe have posted to devel, but the most recent post here was > talking about this very subject so...) I still work on it, i have been using myself some patches from Vivien Chappelier to have ID for netns's that I patched on top to have names too. I did the correspondig patches for ip utility too. We have been using it on our network for some years already. I have a patched Quagga too with support for this infrastructure that I am cleaning up, trying to put it in a git repository and learning git at the same time (so it is going slowly ;). I already knew about Biederman's patches and wanted to take a look at using them for Quagga as they seem to be the ones that are going to be accepted upstream. I don't have too much time now to do research but if you can sent me or point to the needed patches I'll add support in Quagga and publish it. Regards, Jorge -- ============================================================== Jorge Boncompte - Ingenieria y Gestion de RED DTI2 - Desarrollo de la Tecnologia de las Comunicaciones -------------------------------------------------------------- C/ Abogado Enriquez Barrios, 5 14004 CORDOBA (SPAIN) Tlf: +34 957 761395 / FAX: +34 957 450380 ============================================================== - There is only so much duct tape you can put on something before it just becomes a giant ball of duct tape. ============================================================== |
|
From: Mathieu P. <mat...@gm...> - 2010-06-14 09:51:00
|
Hi Jorge and all, I saw you were talking about a patch for linux-mpls that uses named network namespaces, I would like to know if you are still working on the subject and if any patches are available ? I recently posted a (RFC) patch for the ip command that use named network namespaces to configure net namespaces like VRFs , using Eric Biederman's recent set of patches that allows a net namespace to get named, using the filesystem as an "anchor point". Please see: https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/containers/2010-June/024699.html (should maybe have posted to devel, but the most recent post here was talking about this very subject so...) Thanks, -- a+ mathieu |
|
From: Jorge B. [DTI2] <jo...@dt...> - 2010-05-11 08:44:35
|
El 10/05/2010 17:53, Renato Westphal escribió: > Some weeks ago I've done some tests with rudimentary VPNs, without VRFs > and LDP. I have used: > > * command "network A.B.C.D/M rd ASN:nn_or_IP-address:nn tag WORD" to > distribute vpnv4 routes > * extcommunity-list and route-maps to deal with RTs; > * extend bgpd daemon to automatically update the nhlfe/ilm/xc tables > when receiving bgp_update messages > > I could interact with Cisco machines (using GNS3) with no problems, but > i had to set the LSPs manually and there were no isolation (VRFs). > > Also, the following RFCs are already implemented on Quagga: > > * > > RFC 2842: Capabilities Advertisement with BGP-4 Standards Track; > > * > > RFC 2858: Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4 Standards Track; > > * > > RFC 4360: BGP Extended Communities Attribute Standards Track; > > * > > RFC 3107: Carrying Label Information in BGP-4 Standards Track > (there were a label codification bug on the MP_REACH_NLRI > attribute that I've already fixed); > > > Unfortunaly, adding VRF support makes things a lot harder, however i'm > working on this (extending quagga). There is still a long way to go, but > most of the job is already done. > Hi Renato, I have a patch to support full VRF support on zebra daemon. It is almost agnostic about the kernel interface. Currently i have a porting layer to a custom kernel patches I did to implement named network namespaces or current kernels. I have to check if the quagga MPLS patches apply cleanly, they almost did a while ago. I am now cleaning some stuff and I want to publish some code or git tree in a week or two. At some point I had a test network with BGP feeding the VPNV4 prefixes into my kernel, with LDP working, the only thing I needed to have a full working VPN setup was PHP. But it was all a bit ad-hoc. -- ============================================================== Jorge Boncompte - Ingenieria y Gestion de RED DTI2 - Desarrollo de la Tecnologia de las Comunicaciones -------------------------------------------------------------- C/ Abogado Enriquez Barrios, 5 14004 CORDOBA (SPAIN) Tlf: +34 957 761395 / FAX: +34 957 450380 ============================================================== - Sin pistachos no hay Rock & Roll... - Without wicker a basket cannot be made. ============================================================== |
|
From: Renato W. <ren...@gm...> - 2010-05-10 15:53:32
|
Some weeks ago I've done some tests with rudimentary VPNs, without VRFs and LDP. I have used: - command "network A.B.C.D/M rd ASN:nn_or_IP-address:nn tag WORD" to distribute vpnv4 routes - extcommunity-list and route-maps to deal with RTs; - extend bgpd daemon to automatically update the nhlfe/ilm/xc tables when receiving bgp_update messages I could interact with Cisco machines (using GNS3) with no problems, but i had to set the LSPs manually and there were no isolation (VRFs). Also, the following RFCs are already implemented on Quagga: - RFC 2842: Capabilities Advertisement with BGP-4 Standards Track; - RFC 2858: Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4 Standards Track; - RFC 4360: BGP Extended Communities Attribute Standards Track; - RFC 3107: Carrying Label Information in BGP-4 Standards Track (there were a label codification bug on the MP_REACH_NLRI attribute that I've already fixed); Unfortunaly, adding VRF support makes things a lot harder, however i'm working on this (extending quagga). There is still a long way to go, but most of the job is already done. Renato. 2010/5/10 Leucio Ricci <leu...@gm...> > hi huang, > we've just developed a mpls network with a couple of vpn. mpls-linux can do > it...but with some trouble. the main problem is the ldp support that > unluckly it's not stable. anyway, after a careful design, you can manually > assign the label. > > for further infos...mail here > > > On 10 May 2010 08:55, hmy <hua...@gm...> wrote: > >> hello,guys >> >> I want use the mpls-linux and quagga to support the mpls/vpn >> service , but i don't know that mpls-linux can do this ? >> please help me. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpls-linux-general mailing list >> mpl...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general >> >> > > > -- > Ricci Leuciantonio > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general > > |
|
From: Leucio R. <leu...@gm...> - 2010-05-10 08:38:34
|
hi huang, we've just developed a mpls network with a couple of vpn. mpls-linux can do it...but with some trouble. the main problem is the ldp support that unluckly it's not stable. anyway, after a careful design, you can manually assign the label. for further infos...mail here On 10 May 2010 08:55, hmy <hua...@gm...> wrote: > hello,guys > > I want use the mpls-linux and quagga to support the mpls/vpn > service , but i don't know that mpls-linux can do this ? > please help me. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general > > -- Ricci Leuciantonio |
|
From: hmy <hua...@gm...> - 2010-05-10 06:55:29
|
hello,guys
I want use the mpls-linux and quagga to support the mpls/vpn
service , but i don't know that mpls-linux can do this ?
please help me.
|
|
From: Ahsan T. <ahs...@gm...> - 2010-04-29 16:14:07
|
Hi, I have installed mpls-linux 1.963 on six debian machines with kernel version 2.6.30. I ran an example run of MPLS by connecting two linux machines and having one act as ingress the other as egress router (I used all the proper mpls commands to make the tunnel by looking at examples at source forge). Now when an IP packet arrives at the ingress it pushes the label just fine (seen from tcp dump) however the egress hangs up. Could someone please help. Thanks Ahsan |
|
From: Maneesh S. <son...@gm...> - 2010-04-26 15:58:50
|
Hello everybody I am trying to test IPv6 on MPLS-Linux. But it is not working. I can ping end to end with static route. But with MPLS configuration, My linux machine is not forwarding IPv6 packet to nexthop. I configure the MPLS router as following: // at ingress linux router, for forwarding LSP *# mpls nhlfe add key 0 instructions push gen 1000 nexthop eth1 ipv6 2001::100:0:0:2 # ip -6 route add 2001::300:0:0:0/72 via 2001::100:0:0:2 mpls 0x2* //for backward LSP (as egress linux router) *mpls labelspace set dev eth1 labelspace 0 mpls ilm add label gen 1001 labelspace 0* * #dmesg [17184225.276000] MPLS DEBUG net/mpls/mpls_output.c: 290:mpls_output: enter [17184225.276000] MPLS DEBUG net/mpls/mpls_output.c: 229:mpls_output: exit [17184225.276000] MPLS: unable to find a protocol driver(34525)* Please tel me the possible reason. -- Thanks and Regards, Maneesh Soni. TELECOM Bretagne 2,rue de la châtaigneraie CS17607 35576 Cesson Sévigné Cedex France |
|
From: Ahsan T. <ahs...@gm...> - 2010-04-25 11:17:47
|
Hi, Could someone please post the link to mpls-linux version 1.963 (containing the diff files). Thanks Ahsan |
|
From: Ahsan T. <ahs...@gm...> - 2010-04-25 10:53:31
|
Sorry I meant the source of mpls-linux 1.963 Thanks, Ahsan On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Ahsan Tariq <ahs...@gm...>wrote: > Hi, > > Where is the source for mpls-linux 1.63 (containing diff files for kernel > and ebtables etc). could someone post the link. > > Thanks, > > Ahsan > |
533 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
