mpls-linux-general Mailing List for MPLS for Linux (Page 127)
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
jleu
Menu
▾
▴
mpls-linux-general — Mailing list for general discussion about MPLS for Linux
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(26) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 |
Jan
(22) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
(45) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(101) |
Jul
(79) |
Aug
(24) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(71) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2002 |
Jan
(111) |
Feb
(123) |
Mar
(67) |
Apr
(61) |
May
(75) |
Jun
(26) |
Jul
(36) |
Aug
(41) |
Sep
(79) |
Oct
(85) |
Nov
(58) |
Dec
(39) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(61) |
Mar
(80) |
Apr
(56) |
May
(39) |
Jun
(44) |
Jul
(28) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(20) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(14) |
Mar
(68) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(45) |
Jun
(42) |
Jul
(41) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(46) |
Oct
(89) |
Nov
(55) |
Dec
(33) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(74) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(105) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(48) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(22) |
Sep
(33) |
Oct
(28) |
Nov
(29) |
Dec
(81) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(37) |
Feb
(32) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(37) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(28) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(20) |
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(30) |
Dec
(40) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
(24) |
Mar
(65) |
Apr
(69) |
May
(41) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(39) |
Aug
(76) |
Sep
(53) |
Oct
(43) |
Nov
(26) |
Dec
(24) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(19) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(91) |
Apr
(75) |
May
(47) |
Jun
(63) |
Jul
(68) |
Aug
(39) |
Sep
(44) |
Oct
(33) |
Nov
(62) |
Dec
(84) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(55) |
Apr
(63) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(21) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
|
From: Pim V. H. <pim...@in...> - 2002-10-28 18:33:29
|
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 18:57, James R. Leu wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:57:11PM -0700, nitin panjwani wrote: > > Hi James, > > Is this implementation of MPLS supports penultimate > > hop popping or is there way to configure it whatever > > way we want. > > Thanks, > > Nitin > > I'm a bit torn as to how to answer this. Maybe someone out there can > help me decide what is the correct way to do this. I have 2 thoughts: > > -PHP should be the responsibility of the signaling protocol. If a > protocol receives the implicit null label, it should know not > to cross connect to a real label value and instead terminate that level > of the LSP. > > -PHP is controled by the MPLS forwarding plan. If an outsegment is created > with the implicit null label it creates it's instructions in such a way > as to not push a label. During outgoing processing if the packet > doesn't have any labels it is sent out the interface as an IP packet > without doing a routing lookup. If it has labels, then it is sent out > the interface with out interogating the top level label. This brings > up all sorts of questions though. Like how to handle EXP and TTL? > > Anyone care to provide their opinion? IMO the second approach still needs some signaling work (the last hop needs to send a NULL label in its label mapping). So although the second approach sounds pretty cool i dont really see a real hard need for it. Not that I use or even are very interested in PHP so this is just my 0.02$. Pim. > -- > James R. Leu > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future > of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community > Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4729346;7592162;s?http://www.sun.com/javavote > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general > > -- Pim Van Heuven Ghent University - IMEC Department of Information Technology (INTEC) Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat, 41 B-9000, Gent, Belgium pim...@in... DiffServ/MPLS(RSVP-TE) for Linux: http://dsmpls.atlantis.rug.ac.be |
|
From: Georg K. <gk...@gi...> - 2002-10-28 14:22:35
|
Hi all,
playing a bit with the nice IOCTL functions of the MPLS patched
kernel (v1.170), I found out that the SIOCMPLSNHLFEGET ioctl does
not work correctly. The problem lies probably in the function
mpls_get_out_label(), where a memcpy of the looked up info just
changes the local variable label.
INHO a memcpy is wrong here, due to the fact the two arguments
point to different types. So I tried the following change in net/mpls/:
-------------------------------- snip -------------
diff -u mpls_out_info.c mpls_out_info.c.orig
--- mpls_out_info.c Mon Oct 28 14:50:00 2002
+++ mpls_out_info.c.orig Fri Sep 27 11:01:44 2002
@@ -290,14 +290,8 @@
retval = -ESRCH;
goto mpls_get_out_label_cleanup;
}
-// memcpy(&(out->mol_label),&label,sizeof(struct mpls_label));
- out->mol_age = moi->moi_age;
- out->mol_mtu = moi->moi_mtu;
- out->mol_propogate_ttl = moi->moi_propogate_ttl;
- out->mol_label.ml_index = moi->moi_ifindex;
- out->mol_label.ml_type = MPLS_LABEL_KEY;
- out->mol_label.u.ml_key = moi->moi_key;
- out->mol_label.__refcnt = moi->__refcnt;
+ memcpy(&(out->mol_label),&label,sizeof(struct mpls_label));
+ out->mol_age = moi->moi_age;
mpls_out_info_release(moi);
} else {
retval = -ENXIO;
-------------------------------------------------
What do you think about this patch?
Kind regards,
Georg Klug
|
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2002-10-25 17:20:06
|
Can you send me the output from 'cat /proc/net/rt_cache': -before you run the traffic test, but after running a ping -after the traffic stall (but before hitting crtl-c) What I'm looking for is some indication that TCP has outgrown the MTU of the LSP. Also, turning on MPLS kernel tracing after the traffic has stalled. Let the stall persist for a minute of two to see if it is still trying to send TCP packets. Turn on MPLS kernel debugging by doing 'mplsadm2 -d' You can view the output of the debugging by executing 'dmesg' or looking in your syslog files. Thanks On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 07:33:40PM +0300, Michael Vasilenko wrote: > Hello! > > Recently I've installed mpls-linux 1.170 and set up LSP between two > linux hosts running the same kernel. Pings are ok, but when I'm trying > to transfer big file, my wget just stop at the begining: > > > [root@hurricane MPLS]# wget --progress=dot ftp://10.12.12.12/pub/file > --19:27:11-- ftp://10.12.12.12/pub/file > => `file' > Connecting to 10.12.12.12:21... connected. > Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in! > ==> SYST ... done. ==> PWD ... done. > ==> TYPE I ... done. ==> CWD /pub ... done. > ==> PORT ... done. ==> RETR file ... done. > Length: 112,336,896 (unauthoritative) > > 0K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 0% > 12.21 MB/s > 50K ....... <freeze, killed by Ctrl-C> > > > LSP setup is very easy (two connected with cross-cable machines): > > host1: 10.12.12.10 > > /proc/net/mpls* > 0x4001e000 53325/31261747/0 gen 120 0 53326 POP PEEK > eth2 0 10 > 0x00000005 77016/100670698/0 3 PUSH(gen 100) SET(eth2,10.12.12.12) > > route: > 10.12.12.12 via 10.12.12.12 dev eth2 lsp 0x5 > > > > host2: 10.12.12.12 > > /proc/net/mpls* > 0x40019000 77016/100978766/0 gen 100 0 77017 POP PEEK > eth1 0 9 > 0x00000005 53365/31108287/0 2 PUSH(gen 120) SET(eth1,10.12.12.10) > > > route: > > 10.12.12.10 via 10.12.12.10 dev eth1 lsp 0x5 > > Please help me, what I'm doing wrong? Why pings are ok but transfer of > big files not working? > > -- > Michael Vasilenko > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future > of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community > Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general -- James R. Leu |
|
From: Michael V. <ac...@dg...> - 2002-10-25 16:34:22
|
Hello!
Recently I've installed mpls-linux 1.170 and set up LSP between two
linux hosts running the same kernel. Pings are ok, but when I'm trying
to transfer big file, my wget just stop at the begining:
[root@hurricane MPLS]# wget --progress=dot ftp://10.12.12.12/pub/file
--19:27:11-- ftp://10.12.12.12/pub/file
=> `file'
Connecting to 10.12.12.12:21... connected.
Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in!
==> SYST ... done. ==> PWD ... done.
==> TYPE I ... done. ==> CWD /pub ... done.
==> PORT ... done. ==> RETR file ... done.
Length: 112,336,896 (unauthoritative)
0K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 0%
12.21 MB/s
50K ....... <freeze, killed by Ctrl-C>
LSP setup is very easy (two connected with cross-cable machines):
host1: 10.12.12.10
/proc/net/mpls*
0x4001e000 53325/31261747/0 gen 120 0 53326 POP PEEK
eth2 0 10
0x00000005 77016/100670698/0 3 PUSH(gen 100) SET(eth2,10.12.12.12)
route:
10.12.12.12 via 10.12.12.12 dev eth2 lsp 0x5
host2: 10.12.12.12
/proc/net/mpls*
0x40019000 77016/100978766/0 gen 100 0 77017 POP PEEK
eth1 0 9
0x00000005 53365/31108287/0 2 PUSH(gen 120) SET(eth1,10.12.12.10)
route:
10.12.12.10 via 10.12.12.10 dev eth1 lsp 0x5
Please help me, what I'm doing wrong? Why pings are ok but transfer of
big files not working?
--
Michael Vasilenko
|
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2002-10-25 01:28:37
|
Wrong mailing list. Requests for help with ds_mpls should go to that mailing list. On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 10:16:45PM -0300, Alexandre Carlos wrote: > I=B4m having some dificulties on creating the label.conf file so can an= yone > help me please... >=20 > Alex >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future=20 > of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community=20 > Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now.=20 > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0003en > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general --=20 James R. Leu |
|
From: Alexandre C. <ale...@re...> - 2002-10-25 01:14:58
|
I=B4m having some dificulties on creating the label.conf file so can anyo= ne help me please... Alex |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2002-10-24 15:56:15
|
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:57:11PM -0700, nitin panjwani wrote: > Hi James, > Is this implementation of MPLS supports penultimate > hop popping or is there way to configure it whatever > way we want. > Thanks, > Nitin I'm a bit torn as to how to answer this. Maybe someone out there can help me decide what is the correct way to do this. I have 2 thoughts: -PHP should be the responsibility of the signaling protocol. If a protocol receives the implicit null label, it should know not to cross connect to a real label value and instead terminate that level of the LSP. -PHP is controled by the MPLS forwarding plan. If an outsegment is created with the implicit null label it creates it's instructions in such a way as to not push a label. During outgoing processing if the packet doesn't have any labels it is sent out the interface as an IP packet without doing a routing lookup. If it has labels, then it is sent out the interface with out interogating the top level label. This brings up all sorts of questions though. Like how to handle EXP and TTL? Anyone care to provide their opinion? -- James R. Leu |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2002-10-24 15:07:49
|
User mpls-linux kernel patch 1.170. 1.160 had a bug when trying to compile with netfilter MPLS target (BTW the instructions on the RSVP-TE p= age said NOT to turn on the MPLS target .... reading the instructions helps .= ...) On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 12:01:42PM -0300, Alexandre Carlos wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > I=B4m trying do colmpile the kernel 2.4.29 to suport rsvp-te with the f= ollowin > software and patches >=20 > KERNEL_2.4.19_MPLS160.patch, > iptables-1.2.4-dscp.tgz, > DSMPLS+IP.patch > iproute2-current.tar.gz and rsvpd.0.70-rcx.tgz. >=20 > ipt_MPLS.c: In function `target': > ipt_MPLS.c:23: warning: passing arg 1 of `mpls_set_nexthop' from > incompatible pointer type > ipt_MPLS.c:23: warning: passing arg 2 of `mpls_set_nexthop' makes point= er > from integer without a cast > ipt_MPLS.c:23: too few arguments to function `mpls_set_nexthop' > ipt_MPLS.c:20: warning: unused variable `i' > make[3]: ** [ipt_MPLS.o] Erro 1 > make[3]: Saindo do diret=F3rio `/usr/src/linux-2.4.19/net/ipv4/netfilte= r' > make[2]: ** [first_rule] Erro 2 > make[2]: Saindo do diret=F3rio `/usr/src/linux-2.4.19/net/ipv4/netfilte= r' > make[1]: ** [_subdir_ipv4/netfilter] Erro 2 > make[1]: Saindo do diret=F3rio `/usr/src/linux-2.4.19/net' > make: ** [_dir_net] Erro 2 >=20 > Can some on help me please? >=20 > Alex >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future=20 > of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community=20 > Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now.=20 > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4729346;7592162;s?http://www.sun.com/java= vote > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general --=20 James R. Leu |
|
From: Alexandre C. <ale...@re...> - 2002-10-24 15:01:54
|
Hi all,
I=B4m trying do colmpile the kernel 2.4.29 to suport rsvp-te with the fol=
lowin
software and patches
KERNEL_2.4.19_MPLS160.patch,
iptables-1.2.4-dscp.tgz,
DSMPLS+IP.patch
iproute2-current.tar.gz and rsvpd.0.70-rcx.tgz.
ipt_MPLS.c: In function `target':
ipt_MPLS.c:23: warning: passing arg 1 of `mpls_set_nexthop' from
incompatible pointer type
ipt_MPLS.c:23: warning: passing arg 2 of `mpls_set_nexthop' makes pointer
from integer without a cast
ipt_MPLS.c:23: too few arguments to function `mpls_set_nexthop'
ipt_MPLS.c:20: warning: unused variable `i'
make[3]: ** [ipt_MPLS.o] Erro 1
make[3]: Saindo do diret=F3rio `/usr/src/linux-2.4.19/net/ipv4/netfilter'
make[2]: ** [first_rule] Erro 2
make[2]: Saindo do diret=F3rio `/usr/src/linux-2.4.19/net/ipv4/netfilter'
make[1]: ** [_subdir_ipv4/netfilter] Erro 2
make[1]: Saindo do diret=F3rio `/usr/src/linux-2.4.19/net'
make: ** [_dir_net] Erro 2
Can some on help me please?
Alex
|
|
From: nitin p. <tac...@ya...> - 2002-10-24 06:57:12
|
Hi James, Is this implementation of MPLS supports penultimate hop popping or is there way to configure it whatever way we want. Thanks, Nitin __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ |
|
From: Alexandre C. <ale...@re...> - 2002-10-23 23:52:00
|
I=B4m installing rsvpd.0.70 on kernel 2.4.18 there is an error message th= at follows can anyone help me? mplsadm.c: In function `fill_instructions': mplsadm.c:143: union has no member named `dlv' make[1]: ** [mplsadm.o] Erro 1 make[1]: Saindo do diret=F3rio `/home/rsvpd/rsvpd/linux' make: ** [linux] Erro 2 Regards Alex |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2002-10-23 22:44:28
|
Make sure that all of the "routing interfaces" are completely controlled by zebra. In otherwords, do not configure the IP address for interfaces that will be talking OSPF via linux, configure them via zebra. I'm not exactly sure why this is, it may be because zebra treats interfaces learne via the kernel differntly then it treats "zebra" interfaces. I hope this helps. On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 03:26:17PM -0700, nitin panjwani wrote: > HI James, > > First of all I am not feeling confident in posting > this message over here as my curent problem is with > ospf but I am doing as I am more close to this list. > > Here is the problem: > > A----B(ingressLER)-----C(lsr)-----D(egress)----E > | | > +____________________________+ > > Networks: > AB: 1.1.1.0/24 > BC: 2.2.2.0/24 > CD: 3.3.3.0/24 > DE: 4.4.4.0/24 > BD: 5.5.5.0/24 > On B, "ip route list" shows route to 4.4.4.0/24 via > D , which is fine. But when I checked the ospf > database at B, It has not received any route to > 4.4.4.0/24 via C, shouldn't there be one. For the > same reason when I break the BD link, I am not able to > send my packet from A to E. > > All my links other than BD are up and I can ping the > neighbors. > > I am using zebra-0.93a > > Can anyone sugest me waht can be wrong in this. > > One more thing does this version of Zebra support > OSPF-TE. > > Thanks, > Nitin > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site > http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future > of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community > Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0002en > > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general -- James R. Leu |
|
From: nitin p. <tac...@ya...> - 2002-10-23 22:26:17
|
HI James,
First of all I am not feeling confident in posting
this message over here as my curent problem is with
ospf but I am doing as I am more close to this list.
Here is the problem:
A----B(ingressLER)-----C(lsr)-----D(egress)----E
| |
+____________________________+
Networks:
AB: 1.1.1.0/24
BC: 2.2.2.0/24
CD: 3.3.3.0/24
DE: 4.4.4.0/24
BD: 5.5.5.0/24
On B, "ip route list" shows route to 4.4.4.0/24 via
D , which is fine. But when I checked the ospf
database at B, It has not received any route to
4.4.4.0/24 via C, shouldn't there be one. For the
same reason when I break the BD link, I am not able to
send my packet from A to E.
All my links other than BD are up and I can ping the
neighbors.
I am using zebra-0.93a
Can anyone sugest me waht can be wrong in this.
One more thing does this version of Zebra support
OSPF-TE.
Thanks,
Nitin
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/
|
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2002-10-23 13:42:59
|
From mpls-linux/NOTE: -mpls packets appear to be corrupted when running tcpdump or the like on an LER (the packets are not really corrupted, tcpdump is getting an inva= lide version of the packets)=20 On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 02:28:22AM -0300, Alexandre Carlos wrote: > Jim, >=20 > The network is working fine, but i sittl have some dounts, for example = i > strated a ping form 10.1.1.2 to 192.168.67.90 and put the ethereal do > capture the packets and i notice one thing that the ethereal capture tw= o > packets with the some oair source/destination address but one had the M= PLS > header end the other didn=B4t and why the icmp reply don=B4t have a MPL= S header? >=20 > I=B4m sending u the etereal file so u can see. >=20 > Alex > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> > To: "Alexandre Carlos" <ale...@re...> > Cc: <jl...@mi...> > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:40 AM > Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] Re: Dynamic LDP >=20 >=20 > > You will not see any target discovery peers, only indirect peers (whi= ch > > zebra-ldp doesn't support yet) would be shown there. > > > > A better command to look at is 'show ldp neighbor'. > > > > BTW what was the problem? > > > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 12:37:25AM -0300, Alexandre Carlos wrote: > > > Jim, > > > > > > I=B4ve managed to workout that problem, but i have still some... li= ke: > > > > > > one of the hosts can see the neighbor, but the other can=B4t. > > > > > > > > > when i type show ldp discovery i see in A > > > interface discovery sources > > > eth1::xmit > > > targeted discovery sources > > > no configured peer > > > > > > on B > > > interface discovery sources > > > eth0::xmit > > > targeted discovery sources > > > no configured peer > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Alex > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> > > > To: "Alexandre Carlos" <ale...@re...> > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 6:19 PM > > > Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] Re: Dynamic LDP > > > > > > > > > > No. Telnet is not the problem. I doubt it is zebra, because you= have > > > setup > > > > an OSPF network prior to this. > > > > > > > > Just for a sanity check did you do: > > > > -compile zebra (without zebra-ldp.patch) > > > > -build OSPF network > > > > -apply (zebra-ldp.patch) > > > > -'make distclean' in the toplevel zebra directory > > > > -and then re-compile all of the zebra binaries > > > > -use the new zebra, ospfd, and mplsd binaries for you testing > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 05:15:28PM -0300, Alexandre Carlos wrote: > > > > > Do u think that is the version af telnet? O i should re-install > zebra? > > > > > > > > > > Alex > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> > > > > > To: "Alexandre Carlos" <ale...@re...> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 5:30 PM > > > > > Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] Re: Dynamic LDP > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 04:28:04PM -0300, Alexandre Carlos wr= ote: > > > > > > > The kernel doesn=B4t freeze, the TCP session still up, i th= ink > there > > > is a > > > > > > > problem on the communication with the mplsd, i figured that= with > the > > > > > help of > > > > > > > ethereal. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On termial A i did > > > > > > > conf term > > > > > > > mpls ldp > > > > > > > exit > > > > > > > inter eth0 > > > > > > > mpls ldp > > > > > > > > > > > > For a sanity check do not do these commands: > > > > > > > hello inter 60 > > > > > > > keep ali 60 > > > > > > > dest mo un > > > > > > > > > > > > Add this commands under the top level 'mpls ldp' on A and B: > > > > > > trace all > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On B > > > > > > > conf term > > > > > > > mpls ldp > > > > > > > inter eth0 > > > > > > > mpls ldp > > > > > > > (after the enter both A anb B terminals freezed) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do u think that i need to re-install zebra? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> > > > > > > > To: "Alexandre Carlos" <ale...@re...> > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 4:55 PM > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] Re: Dynamic LDP > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 03:47:55PM -0300, Alexandre Carlo= s > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Jim, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I=B4ve tryed what u sugested, i configured one interfac= e of > one > > > host > > > > > and > > > > > > > when > > > > > > > > > i started to configure the onther host the telnet sessi= on > > > frezee, in > > > > > a > > > > > > > way > > > > > > > > > that i can=B4t type anything. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Have u seen any thing liked? U do u suggest me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nope. Nor have I heard from anyone else with this proble= m. > > > > > > > > If there really is a problem, I want to find it, but your= not > > > giving > > > > > me > > > > > > > > anything usefull to go on. Dig deeper in to the problem. > Does > > > the > > > > > kernel > > > > > > > > freeze? Is it just a TCP session stalling? Is the proce= ss > going > > > into > > > > > > > > an infinit loop? What is the last command you typed? Ca= n you > > > turn on > > > > > > > > LDP tracing? Can you 'strace' the process? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There are so many things you can try ... just try somethi= ng! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > > > From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> > > > > > > > > > To: "Alexandre Carlos de Oliveira" <ale...@re...= .br> > > > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 11:50 AM > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] Re: Dynamic LDP > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is this what is causing you so much difficulty? Have= you > > > tried > > > > > > > starting > > > > > > > > > > with a minimal config (just passwords) and then > configuring > > > via > > > > > mplsd > > > > > > > CLI > > > > > > > > > > then saving that config? (to save the config you do = a "wr > > > mem" > > > > > > > > > > from the mplsd CLI) and _then_ starting with that sav= ed > > > config? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you think there is a bug I need more info so I can= fix > it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 01:43:51AM -0200, Alexandre C= arlos > de > > > > > Oliveira > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Jim with the ldp-portable0.250 is this bug fixed? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately you cannot startup mplsd with a confi= g and > > > expect > > > > > it > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > work > > > > > > > > > > > (known bug that I'm working on). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=3D2062329 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 11:02:13PM -0300, Alexand= re > Carlos > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> Jim, i=B4de just tried to startd a telnet sessio= n... > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> but it stops at the scape character, it don=B4t = appear > the > > > > > > > password... > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> I hope u could understand... > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> Alex > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> PS: Jim can i send the your conf file (all of th= em, > > > zebra, > > > > > ospf, > > > > > > > > > mpls) > > > > > > > > > > > >> for me please, so i can compare with mine. > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> Tanks > > > > > > > > > > > >> ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > > > > > >> From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> > > > > > > > > > > > >> To: "Alexandre Carlos" <ale...@re...> > > > > > > > > > > > >> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 11:08 PM > > > > > > > > > > > >> Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] Re: Dynamic LD= P > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > You didn't answer my question: > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > In zebra, are you changing the IP address of t= he > > > loopback > > > > > > > > > interface? > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Jim > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 10:05:09PM -0300, Alex= andre > > > Carlos > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Jim, > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Sometimes i telnet the localhost(loopback) a= nd > > > sometimes > > > > > an > > > > > > > ip > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > address > > > > > > > > > > > >> of my > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > interfaces. > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Alex > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > To: "Alexandre Carlos" <ale...@re....= br> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Cc: <mpl...@li...= t> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 11:00 PM > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] Re: Dynami= c LDP > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Are you changing the IP address on the loo= pback > > > > > interface? > > > > > > > You > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > should > > > > > > > > > > > >> be > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > using a dummy interface _not_ lo. > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Jim > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:59:05PM -0300, > Alexandre > > > > > Carlos > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > when i say freeze is that i can=B4t type= , and > when > > > i > > > > > open a > > > > > > > new > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > linux > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > session > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > to kill the process, and i have to reboo= t the > > > > > computer to > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > stabilish > > > > > > > > > > > >> a > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > new > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > telnet connection. > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > I don=B4t know what i=B4m doing wrong. > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...= m> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > To: "Alexandre Carlos" > <ale...@re...> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Cc: > <mpl...@li...> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 10:35 PM > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] Re: Dy= namic > LDP > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:34:23PM -03= 00, > > > Alexandre > > > > > > > Carlos > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I tryed those command on two host an= d > they > > > both > > > > > > > freezed, > > > > > > > > > i > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > don=B4t > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > know > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > where > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > is the problem... > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > What is your definition of 'freeze'? = Your > TCP > > > > > session > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > stops? The > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > machine > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > locks up? You get a kernel opps on th= e > > > console? > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Jim > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Can some one help me please. > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > From: "James R. Leu" > <jl...@mi...> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > To: "Alexandre Carlos" > > > <ale...@re...> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Cc: > > > <mpl...@li...> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 10:06= PM > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Subject: [mpls-linux-general] Re: Dy= namic > LDP > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Those commands should work just fi= ne. > Try > > > > > 'telnet > > > > > > > 0 > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 12347' > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > instead. > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at > 08:58:47PM -0300, > > > > > Alexandre > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Carlos > > > > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Jim, > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Whats wrong in with tins command= s, > using > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > ldp-potable-0.250 > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > telnet localhost 12347 > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > enable > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > password > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > conf ter > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > mpls ldp > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > exit > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > inte ethx > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > mpls ldp > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > exit > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > exit > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > From: "James R. Leu" > > > <jl...@mi...> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > To: "Alexandre Carlos" > > > > > <ale...@re...> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 9= :26 > PM > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Dynamic LDP > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at > > > 08:21:53PM -0300, > > > > > > > Alexandre > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Carlos > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Jim, > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > With the ldp portable 250 do= i > have > > > to > > > > > > > configure > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > my > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > terminal, > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > like > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > ldp-portable 200. > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > The change log is in the top l= evel > > > > > directory of > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > ldp-portable > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > package. > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > can u send me the modificati= ons? > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > My patch has nothing to do wit= h the > VTY > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > configuration for > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > zebra. > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Jim > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > James R. Leu > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > James R. Leu > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > This sf.net emial is sponsored by: > > > Influence > > > > > the > > > > > > > future > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > of Java(TM) technology. Join the = Java > > > > > Community > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4699841;7576298;k?http://www.sun.com/java= vote> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > mpls-linux-general mailing list > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > mpl...@li... > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > James R. Leu > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > James R. Leu > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > -- > > > > > > > > > > > >> > James R. Leu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > James R. Leu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > James R. Leu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > James R. Leu > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > James R. Leu > > > > > > > > -- > > > > James R. Leu > > > > -- > > James R. Leu --=20 James R. Leu |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2002-10-23 12:27:39
|
The "weird" packets your seeing is a known bug. Things are working correctly. When running ethereal and tcpdump on an LER the packet that gets sent up the stack is still being modified, therefore it's state is unknown. The mesg your seeing is left over debugging in the version you are running, it is perfectly normal. On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:43:11AM +0530, Amritpal Singh wrote: > Hi Jim > > Since I have not as yet upgraded to 1.170 version so I cannot run mplsadm2 > and the cross connect command suggested by you. > > However as a workaround I tried a new configuration. > > I configured MPLS on all the 4 nodes in my setup. The nodes A and D are LER and B and C are LSRs. > > A---------------B-----------C---------------------D > > So the only purpose of B and C is to switch/swap labels. Well all is fine till the point I run ping from A to D. > > I see that the labels are getting perfectly swapped at B and C but > > 1) The packets captured at D are just the Echo reply with a correct label but theres no Echo requests there. > 2) Similarly the packets seen at A are just Echo requests with the correct label but there are no Echo replies. > > Well in both cases I see "Ethernet II " packets getting captured at the ethereal .Each such "ethereal II" packet has > 3 MPLS headers with Unknown values(e.g 253345 , 762256 etc) of labels in them . > Are these actually the Echo reply/requests that I was supposed to see but couldnot because of some configuration error ? > > I found out that the counters in /proc/net /mpls_* are incrementing correctly at both ends. > > What could be wrong in the setup ? > > The "dmesg" output says "mpls_in: returned 0 from ip_recv()". Is this the problem ? > > The label instrcutions are POP PEEK in both A and C > > Please help > Amrit > -------------------------------- > Amritpal Singh > Infosys Technologies Ltd. > Bangalore - 561229 > Tel No : 4166308 > --------------------------------- > ----- Original Message ----- > From: James R. Leu > To: Amritpal Singh > Cc: mpl...@li... > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 10:57 PM > Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] SOS.....MPLS forwarding not working...URGENT > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 05:07:42PM +0530, Amritpal Singh wrote: > > Hi James, > > > > Ya the message "mpls_bind_out2fec: couldn't find the FIB_NODE(0)" is gone now > > after having added the host-specific route. > > But still the problem of counters in /proc/net/mpls_* being zero persists. > > > > I found out that having configured a LSP between B and C only, the counters increment only when I ping > > from A to C or from B to C or D. This is strange because I was testing MPLS by pinging D from A. > > > > > > A---------------B-----------C---------------------D > > > > Can you enlighten me on this ? Why is ping from A to D not taking the MPLS path ? > > Are you creating cross connects on B and C? > > mplsadm2 -B -I gen:16:0 -O 0x4 > > > > > Regards > > Amrit > > ------------------------------ > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: James R. Leu > > To: Amritpal Singh > > Cc: mpl...@li... > > Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 11:14 PM > > Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] SOS.....MPLS forwarding not working...URGENT > > > > > > The first change I suggest you make is to switch to the latest version > > of mpls-linux-1.1. Many things have changed since 1.0, and I do not have > > the time to downgrade to mpls-linux-1.0 to test/verify any of the > > mpls-linux-1.0 command you are try, but...... > > > > ... since it seems like you need to stay with mpls-linux-1.0 the only thing > > I can see wrong (from a quick skim of your output) is that when specifing > > -f <prefix>, the prefix must have an EXACT match in your routing table. > > > > In your example below, 10.2.0.2/32 must show up in your routing table. > > The "mpls_bind_out2fec: couldn't find the FIB_NODE(0)" message in > > the 'dmesg' output is what tells me that 10.2.0.2/32 is not in your > > routing table. > > > > Jim > > > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 06:20:46PM +0530, Amritpal Singh wrote: > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > The following is the setup in which I am trying to test MPLS. > > > > > > > > > -------- ----------------- ----------------- --------- > > > | |------------------ | |------------------| |------------------- | | > > > | A | | B | | C | | D | > > > -------- ----------------- ----------------- --------- > > > 10.1.1.2 10.1.1.1 10.2.0.1 10.2.0.2 10.2.1.1 10.2.1.10 > > > eth0 eth0 eth1 eth0 eth1 eth0 > > > > > > I am running mpls-linux-1.0 on a Red Hat Linux 7.2 > > > All the nodes hav the patch applied to them. > > > > > > Nodes B and C are the ones which should enable me to see label switching. > > > So I configure the incoming and outgoing labels on B and C as follows. > > > > > > **************FOR NODE B ****************************************************** > > > [root@ferrari utils]# ./mplsadm -v -A -O gen:16:eth1:ipv4:10.2.0.2 > > > > > > Out label input: gen:16:eth1:ipv4:10.2.0.2 > > > > > > ipv4 > > > > > > [root@ferrari utils]# > > > > > > [root@ferrari utils]# ./mplsadm -B -O gen:16:eth1 -f 10.2.0.2/32 > > > > > > [root@ferrari utils]# > > > > > > [root@ferrari utils]# ./mplsadm -L eth1:0 > > > > > > [root@ferrari utils]# ./mplsadm -v -A -I gen:17:0 > > > > > > In label input: gen:17:0 > > > > > > [root@ferrari utils]# ./mplsadm -d > > > > > > Debug: Success > > > > > > [root@ferrari utils]# ./mplsadm -v -B -O gen:16:eth1 -f 10.2.0.2/32 > > > > > > Out label input: gen:16:eth1 > > > > > > FEC input: 10.2.0.2/32 > > > > > > ****************END FOR NODE B *********************************************** > > > > > > ****************FOR NODE C ***************************************************** > > > [root@renault utils]# ./mplsadm -v -A -O gen:17:eth0:ipv4:10.2.0.1 > > > > > > Out label input: gen:17:eth0:ipv4:10.2.0.1 > > > > > > ipv4 > > > > > > [root@renault utils]# > > > > > > [root@renault utils]# ./mplsadm -v -B -O gen:17:eth0 -f 10.2.0.1/32 > > > > > > Out label input: gen:17:eth0 > > > > > > FEC input: 10.2.0.1/32 > > > > > > [root@renault utils]# ./mplsadm -L eth0:0 > > > > > > [root@renault utils]# ./mplsadm -v -A -I gen:16:0 > > > > > > In label input: gen:16:0 > > > > > > [root@renault utils]# ./mplsadm -L eth1:0 > > > > > > [root@renault utils]# > > > > > > *****************************END FOR NODE C ************************************* > > > > > > > > > > > > I see all the valid entries in all the mpls_* files in /proc/net as shown below. > > > > > > **********FOR NODE B ************************************************************** > > > [root@ferrari Desktop]# more /proc/net/mpls_* > > > > > > :::::::::::::: > > > > > > /proc/net/mpls_fec > > > > > > :::::::::::::: > > > > > > :::::::::::::: > > > > > > /proc/net/mpls_in > > > > > > :::::::::::::: > > > > > > 40004400 0/0/0 gen 17 0 POP PEEK > > > > > > :::::::::::::: > > > > > > /proc/net/mpls_labelspace > > > > > > :::::::::::::: > > > > > > lo 0 > > > > > > eth1 0 > > > > > > :::::::::::::: > > > > > > /proc/net/mpls_out > > > > > > :::::::::::::: > > > > > > 40004003 0/0/0 PUSH(gen 16) SET(eth1,10.2.0.2) > > > > > > :::::::::::::: > > > > > > /proc/net/mpls_tunnel > > > > > > :::::::::::::: > > > > > > *************END FOR NODE B *************************************************** > > > ***************FOR NODE C ****************************************************** > > > [root@renault root]# more /proc/net/mpls_* > > > > > > :::::::::::::: > > > > > > /proc/net/mpls_fec > > > > > > :::::::::::::: > > > > > > :::::::::::::: > > > > > > /proc/net/mpls_in > > > > > > :::::::::::::: > > > > > > 40004000 0/0/0 gen 16 0 POP PEEK > > > > > > :::::::::::::: > > > > > > /proc/net/mpls_labelspace > > > > > > :::::::::::::: > > > > > > lo 0 > > > > > > eth0 0 > > > > > > :::::::::::::: > > > > > > /proc/net/mpls_out > > > > > > :::::::::::::: > > > > > > 40004403 0/0/0 PUSH(gen 17) SET(eth0,10.2.0.1) > > > > > > :::::::::::::: > > > > > > /proc/net/mpls_tunnel > > > > > > :::::::::::::: > > > > > > > > > > > > But when I try to ping D from A I donot see the label switching happening at all.Ping works fine. > > > > > > But the counters in mpls_in and mpls_out remain 0.Plus I donot see anything in mpls_fec.Should I ? > > > > > > I run ethereal on B and C to see incoming/outgoing labels on the packet but I find that > > > there is absolutely no label on the packets. > > > > > > The last few lines of output of "DMESG" are shown below . > > > ************************FOR NODE B ***************************************** > > > MPLS version 0.996 11/21/2001 jl...@mi... > > > > > > MPLS Tunnel interface > > > > > > ds: no socket drivers loaded! > > > > > > VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly. > > > > > > Freeing unused kernel memory: 224k freed > > > > > > Adding Swap: 153176k swap-space (priority -1) > > > > > > mpls_prep_out2fec: enter > > > > > > Label GEN 16 > > > > > > Key GEN 16 3 > > > > > > mpls_fill_key_res: enter > > > > > > mpls_fill_key_res: exit > > > > > > mpls_bind_out2fec: couldn't find the FIB_NODE(0) > > > > > > mpls_bind_out2fec: exit > > > > > > mpls_set_labelspace: enter > > > > > > mpls_set_labelspace: labelspace(0) > > > > > > mpls_set_labelspace: exit > > > > > > *****************************END FOR NODE B ******************************* > > > ***************************** FOR NODE C ************************************ > > > MPLS version 0.996 11/21/2001 jl...@mi... > > > > > > MPLS Tunnel interface > > > > > > ds: no socket drivers loaded! > > > > > > VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly. > > > > > > Freeing unused kernel memory: 224k freed > > > > > > Adding Swap: 153176k swap-space (priority -1) > > > > > > device eth0 entered promiscuous mode > > > > > > device eth0 left promiscuous mode > > > > > > device eth0 entered promiscuous mode > > > > > > device eth0 left promiscuous mode > > > > > > device eth0 entered promiscuous mode > > > > > > device eth0 left promiscuous mode > > > > > > device eth0 entered promiscuous mode > > > > > > device eth0 left promiscuous mode > > > > > > device eth0 entered promiscuous mode > > > > > > device eth0 left promiscuous mode > > > > > > device eth0 entered promiscuous mode > > > > > > device eth0 left promiscuous mode > > > > > > device eth0 entered promiscuous mode > > > > > > device eth0 left promiscuous mode > > > > > > device eth0 entered promiscuous mode > > > > > > device eth0 left promiscuous mode > > > > > > device eth0 entered promiscuous mode > > > > > > device eth0 left promiscuous mode > > > > > > *******************************************END FOR NODE C ******************************** > > > > > > I cannot upgrade to the latest version available because of time constraints.I had downloaded this > > > version some months back and I have to show MPLS working with this version only. > > > > > > I will be very thankful to all the people who respond and help me in any way. > > > > > > I am looking forward to your comments on this. > > > > > > P.S: Last query: Do I need to "decode" the ICMP packet received at node C by ethereal into a MPLS packet. > > > As I see the raw packet received at the ethereal there is no MPLS header. But there is an option in ethereal > > > to decode the packet in a number of way. So should I decode it at the link layer as MPLS packet to see the header? > > > > > > Thanks again > > > Amrit > > > > > > -------------------------------- > > > Amritpal Singh > > > Infosys Technologies Ltd. > > > Bangalore - 561229 > > > Tel No : 4166308 > > > --------------------------------- > > > > > > -- > > James R. Leu > > > > > -- > James R. Leu > -- James R. Leu |
|
From: Alexandre C. <ale...@re...> - 2002-10-23 05:26:30
|
Jim, The network is working fine, but i sittl have some dounts, for example i strated a ping form 10.1.1.2 to 192.168.67.90 and put the ethereal do capture the packets and i notice one thing that the ethereal capture two packets with the some oair source/destination address but one had the MPL= S header end the other didn=B4t and why the icmp reply don=B4t have a MPLS = header? I=B4m sending u the etereal file so u can see. Alex ----- Original Message ----- From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> To: "Alexandre Carlos" <ale...@re...> Cc: <jl...@mi...> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:40 AM Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] Re: Dynamic LDP > You will not see any target discovery peers, only indirect peers (which > zebra-ldp doesn't support yet) would be shown there. > > A better command to look at is 'show ldp neighbor'. > > BTW what was the problem? > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 12:37:25AM -0300, Alexandre Carlos wrote: > > Jim, > > > > I=B4ve managed to workout that problem, but i have still some... like= : > > > > one of the hosts can see the neighbor, but the other can=B4t. > > > > > > when i type show ldp discovery i see in A > > interface discovery sources > > eth1::xmit > > targeted discovery sources > > no configured peer > > > > on B > > interface discovery sources > > eth0::xmit > > targeted discovery sources > > no configured peer > > > > Regards > > > > Alex > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> > > To: "Alexandre Carlos" <ale...@re...> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 6:19 PM > > Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] Re: Dynamic LDP > > > > > > > No. Telnet is not the problem. I doubt it is zebra, because you h= ave > > setup > > > an OSPF network prior to this. > > > > > > Just for a sanity check did you do: > > > -compile zebra (without zebra-ldp.patch) > > > -build OSPF network > > > -apply (zebra-ldp.patch) > > > -'make distclean' in the toplevel zebra directory > > > -and then re-compile all of the zebra binaries > > > -use the new zebra, ospfd, and mplsd binaries for you testing > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 05:15:28PM -0300, Alexandre Carlos wrote: > > > > Do u think that is the version af telnet? O i should re-install zebra? > > > > > > > > Alex > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> > > > > To: "Alexandre Carlos" <ale...@re...> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 5:30 PM > > > > Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] Re: Dynamic LDP > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 04:28:04PM -0300, Alexandre Carlos wrot= e: > > > > > > The kernel doesn=B4t freeze, the TCP session still up, i thin= k there > > is a > > > > > > problem on the communication with the mplsd, i figured that w= ith the > > > > help of > > > > > > ethereal. > > > > > > > > > > > > On termial A i did > > > > > > conf term > > > > > > mpls ldp > > > > > > exit > > > > > > inter eth0 > > > > > > mpls ldp > > > > > > > > > > For a sanity check do not do these commands: > > > > > > hello inter 60 > > > > > > keep ali 60 > > > > > > dest mo un > > > > > > > > > > Add this commands under the top level 'mpls ldp' on A and B: > > > > > trace all > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On B > > > > > > conf term > > > > > > mpls ldp > > > > > > inter eth0 > > > > > > mpls ldp > > > > > > (after the enter both A anb B terminals freezed) > > > > > > > > > > > > Do u think that i need to re-install zebra? > > > > > > > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> > > > > > > To: "Alexandre Carlos" <ale...@re...> > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 4:55 PM > > > > > > Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] Re: Dynamic LDP > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 03:47:55PM -0300, Alexandre Carlos wrote: > > > > > > > > Jim, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I=B4ve tryed what u sugested, i configured one interface = of one > > host > > > > and > > > > > > when > > > > > > > > i started to configure the onther host the telnet session > > frezee, in > > > > a > > > > > > way > > > > > > > > that i can=B4t type anything. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Have u seen any thing liked? U do u suggest me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nope. Nor have I heard from anyone else with this problem. > > > > > > > If there really is a problem, I want to find it, but your n= ot > > giving > > > > me > > > > > > > anything usefull to go on. Dig deeper in to the problem. Does > > the > > > > kernel > > > > > > > freeze? Is it just a TCP session stalling? Is the process going > > into > > > > > > > an infinit loop? What is the last command you typed? Can = you > > turn on > > > > > > > LDP tracing? Can you 'strace' the process? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There are so many things you can try ... just try something= ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > > From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> > > > > > > > > To: "Alexandre Carlos de Oliveira" <ale...@re....b= r> > > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 11:50 AM > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] Re: Dynamic LDP > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is this what is causing you so much difficulty? Have y= ou > > tried > > > > > > starting > > > > > > > > > with a minimal config (just passwords) and then configuring > > via > > > > mplsd > > > > > > CLI > > > > > > > > > then saving that config? (to save the config you do a = "wr > > mem" > > > > > > > > > from the mplsd CLI) and _then_ starting with that saved > > config? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you think there is a bug I need more info so I can f= ix it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 01:43:51AM -0200, Alexandre Car= los de > > > > Oliveira > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Jim with the ldp-portable0.250 is this bug fixed? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately you cannot startup mplsd with a config = and > > expect > > > > it > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > work > > > > > > > > > > (known bug that I'm working on). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=3D2062329 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 11:02:13PM -0300, Alexandre Carlos > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >> Jim, i=B4de just tried to startd a telnet session.= .. > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> but it stops at the scape character, it don=B4t ap= pear the > > > > > > password... > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> I hope u could understand... > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> Alex > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> PS: Jim can i send the your conf file (all of them= , > > zebra, > > > > ospf, > > > > > > > > mpls) > > > > > > > > > > >> for me please, so i can compare with mine. > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> Tanks > > > > > > > > > > >> ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > > > > >> From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> > > > > > > > > > > >> To: "Alexandre Carlos" <ale...@re...> > > > > > > > > > > >> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 11:08 PM > > > > > > > > > > >> Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] Re: Dynamic LDP > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > You didn't answer my question: > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > In zebra, are you changing the IP address of the > > loopback > > > > > > > > interface? > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Jim > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 10:05:09PM -0300, Alexan= dre > > Carlos > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Jim, > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Sometimes i telnet the localhost(loopback) and > > sometimes > > > > an > > > > > > ip > > > > > > > > > > >> > > address > > > > > > > > > > >> of my > > > > > > > > > > >> > > interfaces. > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Alex > > > > > > > > > > >> > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > > > > >> > > From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > To: "Alexandre Carlos" <ale...@re...= > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Cc: <mpl...@li...> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 11:00 PM > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] Re: Dynamic = LDP > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Are you changing the IP address on the loopb= ack > > > > interface? > > > > > > You > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > should > > > > > > > > > > >> be > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > using a dummy interface _not_ lo. > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Jim > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:59:05PM -0300, Alexandre > > > > Carlos > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > when i say freeze is that i can=B4t type, = and when > > i > > > > open a > > > > > > new > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > linux > > > > > > > > > > >> > > session > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > to kill the process, and i have to reboot = the > > > > computer to > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > stabilish > > > > > > > > > > >> a > > > > > > > > > > >> > > new > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > telnet connection. > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > I don=B4t know what i=B4m doing wrong. > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > To: "Alexandre Carlos" <ale...@re...> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Cc: <mpl...@li...> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 10:35 PM > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] Re: Dyna= mic LDP > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:34:23PM -0300= , > > Alexandre > > > > > > Carlos > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I tryed those command on two host and they > > both > > > > > > freezed, > > > > > > > > i > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > don=B4t > > > > > > > > > > >> > > know > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > where > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > is the problem... > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > What is your definition of 'freeze'? Yo= ur TCP > > > > session > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > stops? The > > > > > > > > > > >> > > machine > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > locks up? You get a kernel opps on the > > console? > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Jim > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Can some one help me please. > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > To: "Alexandre Carlos" > > <ale...@re...> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Cc: > > <mpl...@li...> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 10:06 P= M > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Subject: [mpls-linux-general] Re: Dyna= mic LDP > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Those commands should work just fine. Try > > > > 'telnet > > > > > > 0 > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 12347' > > > > > > > > > > >> > > instead. > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 08:58:47PM -0300, > > > > Alexandre > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Carlos > > > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Jim, > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Whats wrong in with tins commands, using > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > ldp-potable-0.250 > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > telnet localhost 12347 > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > enable > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > password > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > conf ter > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > mpls ldp > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > exit > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > inte ethx > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > mpls ldp > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > exit > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > exit > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > From: "James R. Leu" > > <jl...@mi...> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > To: "Alexandre Carlos" > > > > <ale...@re...> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 9:2= 6 PM > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Dynamic LDP > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at > > 08:21:53PM -0300, > > > > > > Alexandre > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Carlos > > > > > > > > > > >> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Jim, > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > With the ldp portable 250 do i have > > to > > > > > > configure > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > my > > > > > > > > > > >> > > terminal, > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > like > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > ldp-portable 200. > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > The change log is in the top lev= el > > > > directory of > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > >> > > ldp-portable > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > package. > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > can u send me the modification= s? > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > My patch has nothing to do with = the VTY > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > configuration for > > > > > > > > > > >> > > zebra. > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Jim > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > James R. Leu > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > James R. Leu > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > This sf.net emial is sponsored by: > > Influence > > > > the > > > > > > future > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > of Java(TM) technology. Join the Ja= va > > > > Community > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4699841;7576298;k?http://www.sun.com/javavo= te> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > mpls-linux-general mailing list > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > mpl...@li... > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > James R. Leu > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > James R. Leu > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > -- > > > > > > > > > > >> > James R. Leu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > James R. Leu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > James R. Leu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > James R. Leu > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > James R. Leu > > > > > > -- > > > James R. Leu > > -- > James R. Leu |
|
From: Alexandre C. <ale...@re...> - 2002-10-22 22:57:02
|
After the inicialization of a telnet sesion i start the configuration of the dynamic lsp, and after i configured the directed connect interfaces the telnet session freeze, has someone expirienced the same problem? Regards Alex |
|
From: Alexandre C. <ale...@re...> - 2002-10-22 02:21:55
|
When i=B4m starting the deamon mplsd -f /usr/src/local/etc/mplsd.conf -P 12347 -d there is the following message ldp_if_new: ldp_if_new: ldp_if_new: Is this normal? Alex |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2002-10-22 00:59:51
|
Are you changing the IP address on the loopback interface? You should be using a dummy interface _not_ lo. Jim On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:59:05PM -0300, Alexandre Carlos wrote: > when i say freeze is that i can=B4t type, and when i open a new linux s= ession > to kill the process, and i have to reboot the computer to stabilish a n= ew > telnet connection. >=20 > I don=B4t know what i=B4m doing wrong. >=20 > Alex > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> > To: "Alexandre Carlos" <ale...@re...> > Cc: <mpl...@li...> > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 10:35 PM > Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] Re: Dynamic LDP >=20 >=20 > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:34:23PM -0300, Alexandre Carlos wrote: > > > I tryed those command on two host and they both freezed, i don=B4t = know > where > > > is the problem... > > > > What is your definition of 'freeze'? Your TCP session stops? The ma= chine > > locks up? You get a kernel opps on the console? > > > > Jim > > > > > Can some one help me please. > > > > > > Alex > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> > > > To: "Alexandre Carlos" <ale...@re...> > > > Cc: <mpl...@li...> > > > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 10:06 PM > > > Subject: [mpls-linux-general] Re: Dynamic LDP > > > > > > > > > > Those commands should work just fine. Try 'telnet 0 12347' inste= ad. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 08:58:47PM -0300, Alexandre Carlos wrote: > > > > > Jim, > > > > > > > > > > Whats wrong in with tins commands, using ldp-potable-0.250 > > > > > > > > > > telnet localhost 12347 > > > > > > > > > > enable > > > > > > > > > > password > > > > > > > > > > conf ter > > > > > > > > > > mpls ldp > > > > > > > > > > exit > > > > > inte ethx > > > > > mpls ldp > > > > > exit > > > > > exit > > > > > > > > > > Alex > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> > > > > > To: "Alexandre Carlos" <ale...@re...> > > > > > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 9:26 PM > > > > > Subject: Re: Dynamic LDP > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 08:21:53PM -0300, Alexandre Carlos wr= ote: > > > > > > > Jim, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With the ldp portable 250 do i have to configure my termina= l, > like > > > with > > > > > > > ldp-portable 200. > > > > > > > > > > > > The change log is in the top level directory of the ldp-porta= ble > > > package. > > > > > > > > > > > > > can u send me the modifications? > > > > > > > > > > > > My patch has nothing to do with the VTY configuration for zeb= ra. > > > > > > > > > > > > Jim > > > > > > -- > > > > > > James R. Leu > > > > > > > > -- > > > > James R. Leu > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future > > > > of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community > > > > Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. > > > > > > > > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4699841;7576298;k?http://www.sun.com/java= vote > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > mpls-linux-general mailing list > > > > mpl...@li... > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general > > > > -- > > James R. Leu --=20 James R. Leu |
|
From: Alexandre C. <ale...@re...> - 2002-10-22 00:57:31
|
when i say freeze is that i can=B4t type, and when i open a new linux ses= sion to kill the process, and i have to reboot the computer to stabilish a new telnet connection. I don=B4t know what i=B4m doing wrong. Alex ----- Original Message ----- From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> To: "Alexandre Carlos" <ale...@re...> Cc: <mpl...@li...> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 10:35 PM Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] Re: Dynamic LDP > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:34:23PM -0300, Alexandre Carlos wrote: > > I tryed those command on two host and they both freezed, i don=B4t kn= ow where > > is the problem... > > What is your definition of 'freeze'? Your TCP session stops? The mach= ine > locks up? You get a kernel opps on the console? > > Jim > > > Can some one help me please. > > > > Alex > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> > > To: "Alexandre Carlos" <ale...@re...> > > Cc: <mpl...@li...> > > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 10:06 PM > > Subject: [mpls-linux-general] Re: Dynamic LDP > > > > > > > Those commands should work just fine. Try 'telnet 0 12347' instead. > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 08:58:47PM -0300, Alexandre Carlos wrote: > > > > Jim, > > > > > > > > Whats wrong in with tins commands, using ldp-potable-0.250 > > > > > > > > telnet localhost 12347 > > > > > > > > enable > > > > > > > > password > > > > > > > > conf ter > > > > > > > > mpls ldp > > > > > > > > exit > > > > inte ethx > > > > mpls ldp > > > > exit > > > > exit > > > > > > > > Alex > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> > > > > To: "Alexandre Carlos" <ale...@re...> > > > > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 9:26 PM > > > > Subject: Re: Dynamic LDP > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 08:21:53PM -0300, Alexandre Carlos wrot= e: > > > > > > Jim, > > > > > > > > > > > > With the ldp portable 250 do i have to configure my terminal, like > > with > > > > > > ldp-portable 200. > > > > > > > > > > The change log is in the top level directory of the ldp-portabl= e > > package. > > > > > > > > > > > can u send me the modifications? > > > > > > > > > > My patch has nothing to do with the VTY configuration for zebra. > > > > > > > > > > Jim > > > > > -- > > > > > James R. Leu > > > > > > -- > > > James R. Leu > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future > > > of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community > > > Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. > > > > > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4699841;7576298;k?http://www.sun.com/javavo= te > > > _______________________________________________ > > > mpls-linux-general mailing list > > > mpl...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general > > -- > James R. Leu |
|
From: Alexandre C. <ale...@re...> - 2002-10-22 00:36:42
|
When i=B4m starting the deamon mplsd -f /usr/src/local/etc/mplsd.conf -P 12347 -d there is the following message ldp_if_new: ldp_if_new: ldp_if_new: Is this normal? Alex ----- Original Message ----- From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> To: "Alexandre Carlos" <ale...@re...> Cc: <mpl...@li...> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 10:06 PM Subject: [mpls-linux-general] Re: Dynamic LDP > Those commands should work just fine. Try 'telnet 0 12347' instead. > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 08:58:47PM -0300, Alexandre Carlos wrote: > > Jim, > > > > Whats wrong in with tins commands, using ldp-potable-0.250 > > > > telnet localhost 12347 > > > > enable > > > > password > > > > conf ter > > > > mpls ldp > > > > exit > > inte ethx > > mpls ldp > > exit > > exit > > > > Alex > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> > > To: "Alexandre Carlos" <ale...@re...> > > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 9:26 PM > > Subject: Re: Dynamic LDP > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 08:21:53PM -0300, Alexandre Carlos wrote: > > > > Jim, > > > > > > > > With the ldp portable 250 do i have to configure my terminal, lik= e with > > > > ldp-portable 200. > > > > > > The change log is in the top level directory of the ldp-portable package. > > > > > > > can u send me the modifications? > > > > > > My patch has nothing to do with the VTY configuration for zebra. > > > > > > Jim > > > -- > > > James R. Leu > > -- > James R. Leu > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future > of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community > Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4699841;7576298;k?http://www.sun.com/javavo= te > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2002-10-22 00:34:24
|
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:34:23PM -0300, Alexandre Carlos wrote: > I tryed those command on two host and they both freezed, i don=B4t know= where > is the problem... What is your definition of 'freeze'? Your TCP session stops? The machin= e locks up? You get a kernel opps on the console? Jim > Can some one help me please. >=20 > Alex > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> > To: "Alexandre Carlos" <ale...@re...> > Cc: <mpl...@li...> > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 10:06 PM > Subject: [mpls-linux-general] Re: Dynamic LDP >=20 >=20 > > Those commands should work just fine. Try 'telnet 0 12347' instead. > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 08:58:47PM -0300, Alexandre Carlos wrote: > > > Jim, > > > > > > Whats wrong in with tins commands, using ldp-potable-0.250 > > > > > > telnet localhost 12347 > > > > > > enable > > > > > > password > > > > > > conf ter > > > > > > mpls ldp > > > > > > exit > > > inte ethx > > > mpls ldp > > > exit > > > exit > > > > > > Alex > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> > > > To: "Alexandre Carlos" <ale...@re...> > > > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 9:26 PM > > > Subject: Re: Dynamic LDP > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 08:21:53PM -0300, Alexandre Carlos wrote: > > > > > Jim, > > > > > > > > > > With the ldp portable 250 do i have to configure my terminal, l= ike > with > > > > > ldp-portable 200. > > > > > > > > The change log is in the top level directory of the ldp-portable > package. > > > > > > > > > can u send me the modifications? > > > > > > > > My patch has nothing to do with the VTY configuration for zebra. > > > > > > > > Jim > > > > -- > > > > James R. Leu > > > > -- > > James R. Leu > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future > > of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community > > Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. > > > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4699841;7576298;k?http://www.sun.com/java= vote > > _______________________________________________ > > mpls-linux-general mailing list > > mpl...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general --=20 James R. Leu |
|
From: Alexandre C. <ale...@re...> - 2002-10-22 00:32:45
|
I tryed those command on two host and they both freezed, i don=B4t know w= here is the problem... Can some one help me please. Alex ----- Original Message ----- From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> To: "Alexandre Carlos" <ale...@re...> Cc: <mpl...@li...> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 10:06 PM Subject: [mpls-linux-general] Re: Dynamic LDP > Those commands should work just fine. Try 'telnet 0 12347' instead. > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 08:58:47PM -0300, Alexandre Carlos wrote: > > Jim, > > > > Whats wrong in with tins commands, using ldp-potable-0.250 > > > > telnet localhost 12347 > > > > enable > > > > password > > > > conf ter > > > > mpls ldp > > > > exit > > inte ethx > > mpls ldp > > exit > > exit > > > > Alex > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> > > To: "Alexandre Carlos" <ale...@re...> > > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 9:26 PM > > Subject: Re: Dynamic LDP > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 08:21:53PM -0300, Alexandre Carlos wrote: > > > > Jim, > > > > > > > > With the ldp portable 250 do i have to configure my terminal, lik= e with > > > > ldp-portable 200. > > > > > > The change log is in the top level directory of the ldp-portable package. > > > > > > > can u send me the modifications? > > > > > > My patch has nothing to do with the VTY configuration for zebra. > > > > > > Jim > > > -- > > > James R. Leu > > -- > James R. Leu > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future > of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community > Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4699841;7576298;k?http://www.sun.com/javavo= te > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2002-10-22 00:04:55
|
Those commands should work just fine. Try 'telnet 0 12347' instead. On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 08:58:47PM -0300, Alexandre Carlos wrote: > Jim, > > Whats wrong in with tins commands, using ldp-potable-0.250 > > telnet localhost 12347 > > enable > > password > > conf ter > > mpls ldp > > exit > inte ethx > mpls ldp > exit > exit > > Alex > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> > To: "Alexandre Carlos" <ale...@re...> > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 9:26 PM > Subject: Re: Dynamic LDP > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 08:21:53PM -0300, Alexandre Carlos wrote: > > > Jim, > > > > > > With the ldp portable 250 do i have to configure my terminal, like with > > > ldp-portable 200. > > > > The change log is in the top level directory of the ldp-portable package. > > > > > can u send me the modifications? > > > > My patch has nothing to do with the VTY configuration for zebra. > > > > Jim > > -- > > James R. Leu -- James R. Leu |
|
From: Alexandre C. <ale...@re...> - 2002-10-21 23:57:10
|
Jim, Whats wrong in with tins commands, using ldp-potable-0.250 telnet localhost 12347 enable password conf ter mpls ldp exit inte ethx mpls ldp exit exit Alex ----- Original Message ----- From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> To: "Alexandre Carlos" <ale...@re...> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 9:26 PM Subject: Re: Dynamic LDP > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 08:21:53PM -0300, Alexandre Carlos wrote: > > Jim, > > > > With the ldp portable 250 do i have to configure my terminal, like with > > ldp-portable 200. > > The change log is in the top level directory of the ldp-portable package. > > > can u send me the modifications? > > My patch has nothing to do with the VTY configuration for zebra. > > Jim > -- > James R. Leu |
533 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
