mpls-linux-general Mailing List for MPLS for Linux (Page 110)
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
jleu
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(26) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 |
Jan
(22) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
(45) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(101) |
Jul
(79) |
Aug
(24) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(71) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2002 |
Jan
(111) |
Feb
(123) |
Mar
(67) |
Apr
(61) |
May
(75) |
Jun
(26) |
Jul
(36) |
Aug
(41) |
Sep
(79) |
Oct
(85) |
Nov
(58) |
Dec
(39) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(61) |
Mar
(80) |
Apr
(56) |
May
(39) |
Jun
(44) |
Jul
(28) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(20) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(14) |
Mar
(68) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(45) |
Jun
(42) |
Jul
(41) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(46) |
Oct
(89) |
Nov
(55) |
Dec
(33) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(74) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(105) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(48) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(22) |
Sep
(33) |
Oct
(28) |
Nov
(29) |
Dec
(81) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(37) |
Feb
(32) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(37) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(28) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(20) |
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(30) |
Dec
(40) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
(24) |
Mar
(65) |
Apr
(69) |
May
(41) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(39) |
Aug
(76) |
Sep
(53) |
Oct
(43) |
Nov
(26) |
Dec
(24) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(19) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(91) |
Apr
(75) |
May
(47) |
Jun
(63) |
Jul
(68) |
Aug
(39) |
Sep
(44) |
Oct
(33) |
Nov
(62) |
Dec
(84) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(55) |
Apr
(63) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(21) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2003-07-07 15:19:37
|
telnet to the zebra daemon and issue: show router-id What is the output? On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 01:21:49PM +0000, guo qiang wrote: > Hi all > I used ldp-portable0.305+mpls_linux1.172+linux kernel2.4.19,and my topo= logy=20 > is: > =20 > 11.0.2.1/24(eth1) > | > | > | > | > 11.0.2.2/24(eth1) > At each host i input these commands: > mplsd -d -P 1090 >=20 > telnet 127.0.0.1 1090 > root > en > root > config terminal > interface eth1 > mpls ldp >=20 > After input those commands,about 30 seconds later,two telnet process bo= th=20 > suspended ,i couldn't input any command on telnet terminal.But ethereal= =20 > shew there were packets between two hosts,and=20 > packets' type is LDP Hello Message. >=20 > Thanks! >=20 > _________________________________________________________________ > =C3=E2=B7=D1=CF=C2=D4=D8 MSN Explorer: http://explorer.msn.com/lccn =20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including > Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. > Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/0= 1 > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general --=20 James R. Leu |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2003-07-07 15:18:23
|
ldp-portable will work for static routes, but make sure you understand the ramification of 'egress-mode' when doing this. Also you are forgetting the global ldp command and are losing the debug output: mplsd -P 1090 2>&1 > /tmp/mplsd.output & telnet 127.0.0.1 1090 root en root config terminal mpls ldp exit interface eth0 mpls ldp end On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 01:13:49PM +0000, guo qiang wrote: > Hi,all > I use the ldp-portable automatic ldp function,i.e. i use these commands= : > mplsd -d -P 1090 > telnet 127.0.0.1 1090 > root > en > root > config terminal > interface eth0 > mpls ldp >=20 >=20 > Could i not run ospfd,but use static route table? >=20 > Thanks! >=20 > _________________________________________________________________ > =C3=E2=B7=D1=CF=C2=D4=D8 MSN Explorer: http://explorer.msn.com/lccn/ = =20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including > Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. > Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/0= 1 > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general --=20 James R. Leu |
|
From: guo q. <kin...@ho...> - 2003-07-07 13:21:55
|
Hi all
I used ldp-portable0.305+mpls_linux1.172+linux kernel2.4.19,and my topology
is:
11.0.2.1/24(eth1)
|
|
|
|
11.0.2.2/24(eth1)
At each host i input these commands:
mplsd -d -P 1090
telnet 127.0.0.1 1090
root
en
root
config terminal
interface eth1
mpls ldp
After input those commands,about 30 seconds later,two telnet process both
suspended ,i couldn't input any command on telnet terminal.But ethereal
shew there were packets between two hosts,and
packets' type is LDP Hello Message.
Thanks!
_________________________________________________________________
免费下载 MSN Explorer: http://explorer.msn.com/lccn
|
|
From: guo q. <kin...@ho...> - 2003-07-07 13:13:55
|
Hi,all I use the ldp-portable automatic ldp function,i.e. i use these commands: mplsd -d -P 1090 telnet 127.0.0.1 1090 root en root config terminal interface eth0 mpls ldp Could i not run ospfd,but use static route table? Thanks! _________________________________________________________________ 免费下载 MSN Explorer: http://explorer.msn.com/lccn/ |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2003-07-02 15:38:17
|
Are you injecting 127.0.0.1 (localhost) into your OSPF table? On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 08:32:32AM -0700, Guo Qiang wrote: > Hi all > I used ldp-portable0.305+mpls_linux1.172+linux kernel2.4.19,and my topology is: > > 11.0.2.1/24(eth1) > | > | > | > | > 11.0.2.2/24(eth1) > At each host i input these commands: > telnet localhost 1099(mplsd port) > root > en > root > config terminal > interface eth1 > mpls ldp > > > And here are two questions: > 1.I use ethereal capture the ldp packets,and found two hosts both send hello message to 224.0.0.2,but no hello message from 224.0.0.2 two 11.0.2.1 and 11.0.2.2 > 2.After input those commands,about 30 seconds later,two telnet process both suspended ,i couldn't input any command on telnet terminal.But ethreal shew there were packets between 11.0.2.1 and 11.0.2.2,11.0.2.1 and 224.0.0.2,11.0.2.2 and 224.0.0.2. > > > > Thanks! > > > Sincerly > kings > > > > --------------------------------- > Do you Yahoo!? > SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! -- James R. Leu |
|
From: Guo Q. <kin...@ya...> - 2003-07-02 15:32:36
|
Hi all
I used ldp-portable0.305+mpls_linux1.172+linux kernel2.4.19,and my topology is:
11.0.2.1/24(eth1)
|
|
|
|
11.0.2.2/24(eth1)
At each host i input these commands:
telnet localhost 1099(mplsd port)
root
en
root
config terminal
interface eth1
mpls ldp
And here are two questions:
1.I use ethereal capture the ldp packets,and found two hosts both send hello message to 224.0.0.2,but no hello message from 224.0.0.2 two 11.0.2.1 and 11.0.2.2
2.After input those commands,about 30 seconds later,two telnet process both suspended ,i couldn't input any command on telnet terminal.But ethreal shew there were packets between 11.0.2.1 and 11.0.2.2,11.0.2.1 and 224.0.0.2,11.0.2.2 and 224.0.0.2.
Thanks!
Sincerly
kings
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2003-07-02 15:01:00
|
http://www.lathspell.de/linux/uml/ -- James R. Leu |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2003-07-01 13:56:18
|
The Layer 2 cross connect code was removed and placed in a seperate project. If you grab the 'l2cc-kernel' and 'l2cc-linux' directories from my p4 depot you will get all of the code. It hasn't been worked on a couple of months, so it may be a bit stale. On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 02:28:03PM +0200, Levisse Michel wrote: > Hi > > we installed the rpm version of mplsadm2 and we tried to set up an LSP > as described below. > The problem is that mplsadm2 does not recognize the -2 option when > using the mplsadm2 -B -O... command. > > Was there any change since that time ? > > Michel > > > > > From: James R. Leu <jleu@mi...> > > BETA: mpls-linux 1.127 > > 2002-01-29 21:04 > > A new beta is availble for download via CVS (tag mpls-linux_1_127). > > > > Bug fixes > > Locking > > Better refence counting > > Layer 2 Cross Connects (ethernet, port mode) > > > > NOTE: There are a LOT of changes in this code. None of these > > changes > > are documented. Look back in the archive to see the previous > > mpls-linux 1.1 > > annoucements form more info. (if someone wants to write a CHANGES > > doc > > from 1.0 to 1.1 that would be great!!) > > > > The big change in this version is L2CCs. To use: > > > > Ingress LER: > > > > mplsadm2 -A -O gen:16:eth1:ipv4:11.0.1.2 > > mplsadm2 -B -O key:0x2 -2 eth:eth2:port > > > > Egress LER: > > > > mplsadm2 -L eth1:0 > > mplsadm2 -A -I gen:16:0 > > mplsadm2 -B -I gen:16:0 -2 eth:eth3:port > > > > The result is that all packet arriving on the ingress port (eth2) > > get shipped across the LSP, and sent egress port (eth3) unchanged. > > > > Do not enable any L3 protocols on the ingress interface. Just do > > an > > 'ifconfig eth2 up'. > > > > What is this for? Read draft-martini and you'll see where I'm > > going. > > > > Jim > > > > -- > > James R. Leu > > -- James R. Leu |
|
From: Levisse M. <le...@en...> - 2003-07-01 12:28:32
|
Hi we installed the rpm version of mplsadm2 and we tried to set up an LSP as described below. The problem is that mplsadm2 does not recognize the -2 option when using the mplsadm2 -B -O... command. Was there any change since that time ? Michel > From: James R. Leu <jleu@mi...> > BETA: mpls-linux 1.127 > 2002-01-29 21:04 > A new beta is availble for download via CVS (tag mpls-linux_1_127). > > Bug fixes > Locking > Better refence counting > Layer 2 Cross Connects (ethernet, port mode) > > NOTE: There are a LOT of changes in this code. None of these changes > are documented. Look back in the archive to see the previous > mpls-linux 1.1 > annoucements form more info. (if someone wants to write a CHANGES doc > from 1.0 to 1.1 that would be great!!) > > The big change in this version is L2CCs. To use: > > Ingress LER: > > mplsadm2 -A -O gen:16:eth1:ipv4:11.0.1.2 > mplsadm2 -B -O key:0x2 -2 eth:eth2:port > > Egress LER: > > mplsadm2 -L eth1:0 > mplsadm2 -A -I gen:16:0 > mplsadm2 -B -I gen:16:0 -2 eth:eth3:port > > The result is that all packet arriving on the ingress port (eth2) > get shipped across the LSP, and sent egress port (eth3) unchanged. > > Do not enable any L3 protocols on the ingress interface. Just do an > 'ifconfig eth2 up'. > > What is this for? Read draft-martini and you'll see where I'm going. > > Jim > > -- > James R. Leu |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2003-06-30 19:22:33
|
My guess us that you didn't download the entire RPM (download failed, ran out of disk space, etc). Try downloading the RPM again and make sure it is the correct size. On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 04:51:15AM -0700, Zahra Farahmand wrote: > Hi all, > I want to use RPMs,I have Red Hat Linux 8 and I > downloaded zebra-0.94-1+ldp0.310.i386.rpm and to > install this package I entered "rpm -ivh > zebra-0.94-1+ldp0.310.i386.rpm" but this error occured > and the package can't installed: > error :zebra-0.94-1+ldp0.310.i386.rpm:MD5 digest: BAD > Expected(d9511eb4863659f43da9c53a85254b4)!=(30df84bacd63ec62806cbffc85d6a1) > error:zebra-0.94-1+ldp0.310.i386.rpm cannot installed. > > Thanks for your help. > Farahmand > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! > http://sbc.yahoo.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including > Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. > Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general -- James R. Leu |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2003-06-30 19:20:27
|
I use user-mode-linux. I create the virtual network links by creating bridge interfaces that encompass eash of the 'TAP' interfaces created by each UML. Here is an example of myu command for setting up on UML: brctl addbr br0 brctl addbr br1 brctl addbr br2 brctl addbr br3 ifconfig br0 up ifconfig br1 up ifconfig br2 up ifconfig br3 up tunctl -t tap1 tunctl -t tap11 tunctl -t tap12 tunctl -t tap13 ifconfig tap1 up ifconfig tap11 up ifconfig tap12 up ifconfig tap13 up brctl addif br0 tap1 brctl addif br1 tap11 brctl addif br2 tap12 brctl addif br3 tap13 linux umid=uml1 root=/dev/ubd0 ubd0=uml1/rootfs ubd1=usrfs ubd7=uml1/swapfs eth0=tuntap,tap1 mem=16m eth1=tuntap,tap11 eth2=tuntap,tap12 eth3=tuntap,tap13 I then create more tap interfaces for the other UMLs and add their taps to the appropriate bridge group. On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 04:40:25AM -0700, Zahra Farahmand wrote: > Hi all > I'm currently working on setup a small OSPF network > and then I want to integrate LDP into zebra. I want to > use ldp-portable for this purpose. > How can I do my test network on one device and > simulate a multi node network? > Help me pls. > Thanks in advance. > > Regards, > Farahmand. > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! > http://sbc.yahoo.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including > Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. > Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general -- James R. Leu |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2003-06-30 18:54:08
|
Just a quick update on the p4 server move. I have physically moved the machine, upgraded to RH9 (it is questionable if it really is an upgrade), restored the P4 depot, and re-established DNS for leu.dangermen.com. Of course it took longer then the 3 days I had planned for. It looks like the throughput to the new server is sufficient for 'snappy' P4 updates, but is a bit painfull for sucking down a new client. If you have a p4 client setup, please test to make sure your able to sync. I still need to install a UPS, but that should be a minor outage. Thanks for your patience. PS For those who care, the machine has moved from Pittsburgh PA to Madison WI. I was previously working for a company called Laurel Networks (http://laurelnetworks.com/) and in December I decided to leave there and work for a small company called iNOC (http://internetnoc.com). I have been living in Madison since January, and just recently purchased my first home. This past week I moved the last of my 'stuff' out of Pittsburgh and setup the data closet in my house. -- James R. Leu |
|
From: Levisse M. <le...@en...> - 2003-06-30 16:44:27
|
Hi,
It seems we are stuck at the same point as "a a".
Here is our topology :
xxx.xxx.214.5 xxx.xxx.214.6
xxx.xxx.214.9 xxx.xxx.214.10
|
| |
|
| eth1 eth1 |
| eth2 eth1 |
+-----------------------------------------------+
+-----------------------------------------------+
xxx.xxx.214.4/30
xxx.xxx.214.8/30
Here are our initial config files :
|
|
From: Zahra F. <mar...@ya...> - 2003-06-30 11:51:31
|
Hi all, I want to use RPMs,I have Red Hat Linux 8 and I downloaded zebra-0.94-1+ldp0.310.i386.rpm and to install this package I entered "rpm -ivh zebra-0.94-1+ldp0.310.i386.rpm" but this error occured and the package can't installed: error :zebra-0.94-1+ldp0.310.i386.rpm:MD5 digest: BAD Expected(d9511eb4863659f43da9c53a85254b4)!=(30df84bacd63ec62806cbffc85d6a1) error:zebra-0.94-1+ldp0.310.i386.rpm cannot installed. Thanks for your help. Farahmand __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com |
|
From: Zahra F. <mar...@ya...> - 2003-06-30 11:40:40
|
Hi all I'm currently working on setup a small OSPF network and then I want to integrate LDP into zebra. I want to use ldp-portable for this purpose. How can I do my test network on one device and simulate a multi node network? Help me pls. Thanks in advance. Regards, Farahmand. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com |
|
From: a a <dre...@ho...> - 2003-06-27 08:22:13
|
Ok... I have extended my test-network to the following:
snowcrash-mpls
10.0.0.100/8 (eth0)
|
|
10.0.0.1/8 (eth0)
naftali-mpls
192.168.0.1/24 (eth1)
|
|
192.168.0.100 (eth0)
pennywise-mpls
I have created a route to the other subnet on both snowcrash and pennywise
by doing this:
pennywise# ip route add 10.0.0.0/8 via 192.168.0.1
snowcrash# ip route add 192.168.0.0/24 via 10.0.0.1
So, they can establis a link now... It seems like the traffic flowing on
this link isn't mpls-pkts. I have been using tethereal in order to pick up
some pkts. Might it be so that tethereal is getting the pkts after the
kernel stripped the mpls-shim?
I can see that some labels has been created:
snowcrash-mplsd# show ldp neighbor
Peer LDP Ident: 192.68.0.1:0; Local LDP Ident: 10.0.0.100:0
TCP connection: 0.0.0.0.646 - 10.0.0.1.1026
State: OPERATIONAL; Msg sent/recv: 09/274; UNSOLICITED
Up time: 00:21:39
LDP discovery sources:
eth0
Addresses bound to peer:
10.0.0.1 192.168.0.1
snowcrash-mplsd# show ldp database
10.0.0.0/8 local binding: label: gen 10000
10.0.0.0/16 remote binding: no outlabel lsl 192.168.0.1:0
192.168.0.0/24 remote binding: label: gen 10001 lrs: 192.168.0.1:0
ingress
naftali-mplsd# show ldp neighbor
Peer LDP Ident: 10.0.0.100:0; Local LDP Ident: 192.168.0.1:0
TCP connection: 0.0.0.0.646 - 10.0.0.1.646
State: OPERATIONAL; Msg sent/recv: 105/307; UNSOLICITED
Up time: 00:24.53
LDP discovery sources:
eth0
Addresses bound to peer:
10.0.0.100
Peer LDP Ident: 192.168.0.100:0; Local LDP Ident: 192.168.0.1:0
TCP connection: 0.0.0.0.646 - 192.168.0.100.1025
State: OPERATIONAL; Msg sent/recv: 84/245; UNSOLICITED
Up time: 00:19.35
LDP discovery sources:
eth1
Addresses bound to peer:
192.168.0.100
naftali-mplsd# show ldp database
10.0.0.0/16 local binding: label: gen 10000
192.168.0.0/24 local binding: laben: gen 10001
10.0.0.0/8 remote binding: no outlabel lsr: 10.0.0.100:0
10.0.0.0/16 local binding: local binding: label: gen 10002
192.168.0.0/24 local binding: label: gen 10003
192.168.0.0/24 remote binding: no outlabel lsr: 192.168.0.100:0
pennywise-mplsd# show ldp neighbor
Peer LDP Ident: 192.168.0.1:0; Local LDP Ident: 192.168.0.100:0
TCP connection: 0.0.0.0.646 - 192.168.0.1.646
State: OPERATIONAL; Msg sent/recv: 94/285; UNSOLICITED
Up time: 00:22:30
LDP discovery sources:
eth0
Addresses bound to peer:
10.0.0.1 192.168.0.1
pennywise-mplsd# show ldp database
10.0.0.0/16 remote binding: label: gen 10002 lrs: 192.168.0.1:0 ingress
192.168.0.0/24 remote binding: no outlabel lsr: 192.168.0.1:0
192.168.0.0/24 local binding: label: gen 10000
-------------
Do anyone have a suggestion on how to proceed from here?
Thanks in advance for your help!
Sincerly,
Drew
>From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...>
>Reply-To: jl...@mi...
>To: a a <dre...@ho...>
>CC: mpl...@li...
>Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] (no subject)
>Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 11:10:05 -0500
>
>I would create a 'dummy0' interface on each device (as I describe in my
>zebra sample on http://mpls-linux.sf.net/). Also you will never get
>traffic between just two boxes to be labeled (there is no reason, they
>would both be LERs). You need a 3rd device to make it interesting.
>Take a look at user-mode-linux (http://user-mode-linux.sf.net/) for
>a 'easy' way to simulate a multi node network on one device.
>
>On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 12:37:07PM +0200, a a wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I have checked the output from the commands you recommended me, and
>found
> > some strange stuff...
> >
> > #show ldp database
> > 192.168.0.0/24 local binding: label: gen 10000
> > 192.168.0.0/24 remote binding: no outlabel lsr: 192.168.0.101:0
> >
> > I have the following hardware setup:
> >
> > snowcrash-mpls pennywise-mpls
> > 192.168.0.101 192.168.0.100
> > | |
> > | eth0 | eth0
> > +-----------------------------------------------+
> > 192.168.0.0/24
> >
> > How do I get the mplsd to assign an outgoing label to the other machine?
> > I have included my conf-files and all output from the show ... stuff.
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Andreas
> >
> > >From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...>
> > >Reply-To: jl...@mi...
> > >To: a a <dre...@ho...>
> > >CC: mpl...@li...
> > >Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] (no subject)
> > >Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 10:54:11 -0500
> > >
> > >On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 01:44:24PM +0200, a a wrote:
> > > > Hi again!
> > > >
> > > > How do I use the labels given by the zebra-ldp? I have investigated
>some
> > > > pkts with tethereal and found that the pkts are not mpls pkts...
> > > > Do I have to use mplsadm in order to use the lsp:s?
> > >
> > >Check the output from the 'ldp' related show commands. From the mplsd
> > >command line:
> > >
> > > show ldp discovery
> > > show ldp neighbor
> > > show ldp database
> > >
> > >Also look at the MPLS show commands:
> > >
> > > show mpls forwarding
> > > show mpls ftn
> > >
> > >Also, check the:
> > >
> > > show ip route
> > >
> > >output from the zebra command line.
> > >
> > >If everything is running correctly mplsd will create the MPLS
>forwarding
> > >entites in the kernel for you and bind the LSPs to route entries.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Sincerly,
> > > > Drew
> > > >
> > > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > > Hitta rätt på nätet med MSN Sök http://search.msn.se/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
> > > > Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting
>Partner.
> > > > Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly
>Commission!
> > > > INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting
>http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > mpls-linux-general mailing list
> > > > mpl...@li...
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general
> > >
> > >--
> > >James R. Leu
> > >
> > >
> > >-------------------------------------------------------
> > >This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
> > >Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting
>Partner.
> > >Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly
>Commission!
> > >INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >mpls-linux-general mailing list
> > >mpl...@li...
> > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Hitta rätt på nätet med MSN Sök http://search.msn.se/
>
> > !
> > ! Zebra configuration saved from vty
> > ! 2002/03/23 17:07:30
> > !
> > hostname snowcrash-mplsd
> > password zebra
> > enable password zebra
> > !
> > mpls ldp
> > !
> > interface lo
> > !
> > interface eth0
> > mpls ldp
> > !
> > interface dummy0
> > !
> > line vty
> > exec-timeout 0 0
> > !
> >
>
> > ! -*- ospf -*-
> > !
> > ! OSPFd sample configuration file
> > !
> > !
> > hostname snowcrash-ospfd
> > password zebra
> > enable password zebra
> > interface lo
> > interface eth0
> > interface dummy0
> > interface teql0
> > router ospf
> > passive-interface lo
> > network 10.0.0.0/24 area 0
> > network 192.168.0.0/24 area 0
> > ! network 192.168.0.2/32 area 0
> > line vty
> > exec-timeout 0 0
> >
> > log stdout
> >
>
> > ! -*- zebra -*-
> > !
> > ! zebra sample configuration file
> > !
> > ! $Id: zebra.conf.sample,v 1.14 1999/02/19 17:26:38 developer Exp $
> > !
> > hostname snowcrash-zebra
> > password zebra
> > enable password zebra
> > !
> > ! Interface's description.
> > !
> > interface lo
> > description Loopback
> > !
> > interface dummy0
> > ip address 192.168.0.250/32
> > !
> > interface eth0
> > !
> > !interface sit0
> > ! multicast
> >
> > interface teql0
> > !
> > ! Static default route sample.
> > !
> > !ip route 0.0.0.0/0 203.181.89.241
> > !
> >
> > !log file zebra.log
> >
>
> > snowcrash-mplsd> show ldp database
> > 192.168.0.0/24 remote binding: no outlabel lsr: 192.168.0.100:0
> > 192.168.0.0/24 local binding: label: gen 10000
> >
> > snowcrash-mplsd> show ldp discovery
> >
> > Local LSR Identifier: 192.168.0.101
> >
> > Interface Discovery Sources:
> > eth0: xmit
> >
> > Targeted Discovery Sources:
> > No configured peers
> >
> > snowcrash-mplsd> show ldp neighbor
> > Peer LDP Ident: 192.168.0.100:0; Local LDP Ident: 192.168.0.101:0
> > TCP connection: 0.0.0.0.646 - 192.168.0.100.646
> > State: OPERATIONAL; Msgs sent/recv: 25/73; UNSOLICITED
> > Up time: 00:05:22
> > LDP discovery sources:
> > eth0
> > Addresses bound to peer:
> > 192.168.0.100
> >
> >
> > snowcrash-mplsd> show ldp session
> > 2 192.168.0.100 45 OPERATIONAL
> > 192.168.0.100
> > snowcrash-mplsd> show mpls forw
> > snowcrash-mplsd> show mpls forwarding
> > Insegments:
> > Lbl Spc Label Owner
> > 0 10000 LDP
> > Total 1
> >
> > Outsegments:
> >
> > Total 0
> >
> > Cross Connects:
> >
> > Total 0
> >
> > snowcrash-mplsd> show mpls ftn
> > FTNs:
> >
> > Total 0
> >
> > snowcrash-zebra# show ip route
> > C>* 127.0.0.0/8 is directly connected, lo
> > O 192.168.0.0/24 [110/10] is directly connected, eth0, 00:18:41
> > C>* 192.168.0.0/24 is directly connect, eth0
> >
>
>
>--
>James R. Leu
_________________________________________________________________
Lättare att hitta drömresan med MSN Resor http://www.msn.se/resor/
|
|
From: Miguel G. <mg...@fi...> - 2003-06-26 21:27:05
|
Hi everybody, I've got a question: Is there a way to remotely obtain a mpls-linux enabled computer's MIB via SNMP or any other protocol? Does mpls-linux support that? thanks miguel ********************************************** Ing. Miguel Griot Instituto de Ingenier=EDa El=E9ctrica, Facultad de Ingenier=EDa, Universidad de la Rep=FAblica. Tel. 7113785 int. 123 ********************************************** |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2003-06-26 15:07:57
|
The primary definition of 'FEC' that is stored in the kernel is a route bound to an LSP. You will have to use netlink to get the route information then look for the presence of RTA_LSP information. There is also the case where a LSP is bound to a 'mpls tunnel' interface. In which case you can walk the interface list (via netlink) look for the hardware type of a MPLS tunnel and then query it for the outgoing label information. In a short time I will be re-releasing Layer 2 over MPLS code which will have a /proc interface to see which outgoing label is bound to a particular Layer 2 interface. On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 08:28:38PM +0200, Stefan Winter wrote: > Hello, > > after having implemented the MPLS-LSR-STD-MIB, which went really smooth with > mpls-linux, I am now going on to the FTN-MIB so that packets can be pushed > into an LSP. I am not sure how to do this... > Could someone send me a short intro about how to achieve that a FEC is bound > to a LSP? > > Greetings, > > Stefan Winter > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU > Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. > Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! > INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general -- James R. Leu |
|
From: Levisse M. <le...@en...> - 2003-06-26 12:41:32
|
We are currently testing BGP and LDP over Linux. This is for us a=20 school research on the state of the art for these two fields. We aim at=20= testing a small VPN with BGP and LDP. We have installed: mpls-linux 1.172 with linux 2.4.20 kernel iptables 1.2.7a zebra 0.94 with ldp-portable 0.310 patch The reason of my question was why, as no rsvpte daemon is running on=20 the machine, how is it so that mplsd daemon try to initialize=20 rsvpte_vty ? I probably miss-configured something but I am unable to locate the=20 error. Thanks for your help ML Le jeudi, 26 juin 2003, =E0 14:11 Europe/Paris, e7...@ti... a =E9crit = : > Hi what are you looking for? > Which are the scope of your research? Wich packets have you installed? > I've seen that you use ldp-portable and rsvp. Is it correct? > Without more information is as difficult that someone can help you >> -- Messaggio Originale -- >> From: Levisse Michel <le...@en...> >> To: mpl...@li... >> Subject: [mpls-linux-general] ldp daemon >> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 09:40:45 +0200 >> >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm a newbie with ldp-portable and mpls-linux. >> We installed the latest version available of all the stuff, however >> when I try to launch the MPLS daemon I got an error message and the >> daemon is not launched : >> [root vthd2] mplsd -d >> rsvpte_vty_init >> There is no such command. >> Error occured during reading below line. >> lsr-id XXX.XXX.214.132 >> >> I'm using three linux routers, and I got the problem on two of them. >> >> Thank you for your help >> >> >> Michel Levisse >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU >> Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting=20 >> Partner. >> Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly=20 >> Commission! >> INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting = http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php >> _______________________________________________ >> mpls-linux-general mailing list >> mpl...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general > > > __________________________________________________________________ > Il Numero di Accesso ad Internet sta cambiando! > Modifica subito il tuo numero di accesso con Tiscali: il nuovo > numero e' 7023456789 oppure vai alla pagina > http://assistenza.tiscali.it/connessione/mail.html > e scarica il file di configurazione automatica. > > > |
|
From: Levisse M. <le...@en...> - 2003-06-26 07:40:59
|
Hi, I'm a newbie with ldp-portable and mpls-linux. We installed the latest version available of all the stuff, however when I try to launch the MPLS daemon I got an error message and the daemon is not launched : [root vthd2] mplsd -d rsvpte_vty_init There is no such command. Error occured during reading below line. lsr-id XXX.XXX.214.132 I'm using three linux routers, and I got the problem on two of them. Thank you for your help Michel Levisse |
|
From: ramakrishna k. <ram...@re...> - 2003-06-26 05:08:01
|
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 Stefan Winter wrote : >Hello, > >after having implemented the MPLS-LSR-STD-MIB, which went really >smooth with >mpls-linux, I am now going on to the FTN-MIB so that packets can >be pushed >into an LSP. I am not sure how to do this... >Could someone send me a short intro about how to achieve that a >FEC is bound >to a LSP? > >Greetings, > >Stefan Winter > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU >Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting >Partner. >Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly >Commission! >INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting >http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php >_______________________________________________ >mpls-linux-general mailing list >mpl...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general ___________________________________________________ Click below to experience Sooraj Barjatya's latest offering 'Main Prem Ki Diwani Hoon' starring Hrithik Roshan, Abhishek Bachchan & Kareena Kapoor http://www.mpkdh.com |
|
From: Stefan W. <ma...@st...> - 2003-06-25 18:28:38
|
Hello, after having implemented the MPLS-LSR-STD-MIB, which went really smooth with mpls-linux, I am now going on to the FTN-MIB so that packets can be pushed into an LSP. I am not sure how to do this... Could someone send me a short intro about how to achieve that a FEC is bound to a LSP? Greetings, Stefan Winter |
|
From: <e7...@ti...> - 2003-06-24 13:59:17
|
Hi i'm testing MPLS QoS on Linux. Is there anyone that is working on it too= ? Can he give me his e-mail address (to speak about tests and results of th= em) I'm choosing the signalling protocol. I know that there is a project on RSVP with DiffServE, is there any project, mailing list, tester about CR-= LDP,something where i can see the difference in action between CR-LDP and RSVP (in part= icular for QoS test)? Thanks in advance __________________________________________________________________ Il Numero di Accesso ad Internet sta cambiando! Modifica subito il tuo numero di accesso con Tiscali: il nuovo numero e' 7023456789 oppure vai alla pagina http://assistenza.tiscali.it/connessione/mail.html e scarica il file di configurazione automatica. |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2003-06-23 06:16:00
|
I am re-locating my p4 server. Starting sometime on Monday (June 23) it will be unreachable until Thursday (June 26). -- James R. Leu |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2003-06-19 14:23:56
|
I would create a 'dummy0' interface on each device (as I describe in my zebra sample on http://mpls-linux.sf.net/). Also you will never get traffic between just two boxes to be labeled (there is no reason, they would both be LERs). You need a 3rd device to make it interesting. Take a look at user-mode-linux (http://user-mode-linux.sf.net/) for a 'easy' way to simulate a multi node network on one device. On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 12:37:07PM +0200, a a wrote: > Hi! >=20 > I have checked the output from the commands you recommended me, and fou= nd=20 > some strange stuff... >=20 > #show ldp database > 192.168.0.0/24 local binding: label: gen 10000 > 192.168.0.0/24 remote binding: no outlabel lsr: 192.168.0.101:0 >=20 > I have the following hardware setup: >=20 > snowcrash-mpls pennywise-mpls > 192.168.0.101 192.168.0.100 > | | > | eth0 | eth0 > +-----------------------------------------------+ > 192.168.0.0/24 >=20 > How do I get the mplsd to assign an outgoing label to the other machine= ? > I have included my conf-files and all output from the show ... stuff. >=20 > Thanks in advance, > Andreas >=20 > >From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> > >Reply-To: jl...@mi... > >To: a a <dre...@ho...> > >CC: mpl...@li... > >Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] (no subject) > >Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 10:54:11 -0500 > > > >On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 01:44:24PM +0200, a a wrote: > > > Hi again! > > > > > > How do I use the labels given by the zebra-ldp? I have investigated= some > > > pkts with tethereal and found that the pkts are not mpls pkts... > > > Do I have to use mplsadm in order to use the lsp:s? > > > >Check the output from the 'ldp' related show commands. From the mplsd > >command line: > > > > show ldp discovery > > show ldp neighbor > > show ldp database > > > >Also look at the MPLS show commands: > > > > show mpls forwarding > > show mpls ftn > > > >Also, check the: > > > > show ip route > > > >output from the zebra command line. > > > >If everything is running correctly mplsd will create the MPLS forwardi= ng > >entites in the kernel for you and bind the LSPs to route entries. > > > > > > > > Sincerly, > > > Drew > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > Hitta r=E4tt p=E5 n=E4tet med MSN S=F6k http://search.msn.se/ > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU > > > Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Par= tner. > > > Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commis= sion! > > > INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.= php > > > _______________________________________________ > > > mpls-linux-general mailing list > > > mpl...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general > > > >-- > >James R. Leu > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- > >This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU > >Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partne= r. > >Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commissio= n! > >INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php > >_______________________________________________ > >mpls-linux-general mailing list > >mpl...@li... > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general >=20 > _________________________________________________________________ > Hitta r=E4tt p=E5 n=E4tet med MSN S=F6k http://search.msn.se/ > ! > ! Zebra configuration saved from vty > ! 2002/03/23 17:07:30 > ! > hostname snowcrash-mplsd > password zebra > enable password zebra > ! > mpls ldp > ! > interface lo > ! > interface eth0 > mpls ldp > ! > interface dummy0 > ! > line vty > exec-timeout 0 0 > ! >=20 > ! -*- ospf -*- > ! > ! OSPFd sample configuration file > ! > ! > hostname snowcrash-ospfd > password zebra > enable password zebra > interface lo > interface eth0 > interface dummy0 > interface teql0 > router ospf > passive-interface lo > network 10.0.0.0/24 area 0 > network 192.168.0.0/24 area 0 > ! network 192.168.0.2/32 area 0 > line vty > exec-timeout 0 0 >=20 > log stdout >=20 > ! -*- zebra -*- > ! > ! zebra sample configuration file > ! > ! $Id: zebra.conf.sample,v 1.14 1999/02/19 17:26:38 developer Exp $ > ! > hostname snowcrash-zebra > password zebra > enable password zebra > ! > ! Interface's description. > ! > interface lo > description Loopback > ! > interface dummy0 > ip address 192.168.0.250/32 > ! > interface eth0 > ! > !interface sit0 > ! multicast >=20 > interface teql0 > ! > ! Static default route sample. > ! > !ip route 0.0.0.0/0 203.181.89.241 > ! >=20 > !log file zebra.log >=20 > snowcrash-mplsd> show ldp database > 192.168.0.0/24 remote binding: no outlabel lsr: 192.168.0.100:0 > 192.168.0.0/24 local binding: label: gen 10000 >=20 > snowcrash-mplsd> show ldp discovery >=20 > Local LSR Identifier: 192.168.0.101 >=20 > Interface Discovery Sources: > eth0: xmit >=20 > Targeted Discovery Sources: > No configured peers >=20 > snowcrash-mplsd> show ldp neighbor > Peer LDP Ident: 192.168.0.100:0; Local LDP Ident: 192.168.0.101:0 > TCP connection: 0.0.0.0.646 - 192.168.0.100.646 > State: OPERATIONAL; Msgs sent/recv: 25/73; UNSOLICITED > Up time: 00:05:22 > LDP discovery sources: > eth0 > Addresses bound to peer: > 192.168.0.100 >=20 >=20 > snowcrash-mplsd> show ldp session > 2 192.168.0.100 45 OPERATIONAL > 192.168.0.100 > snowcrash-mplsd> show mpls forw > snowcrash-mplsd> show mpls forwarding > Insegments: > Lbl Spc Label Owner > 0 10000 LDP > Total 1 >=20 > Outsegments: >=20 > Total 0 >=20 > Cross Connects: >=20 > Total 0 >=20 > snowcrash-mplsd> show mpls ftn > FTNs: >=20 > Total 0 >=20 > snowcrash-zebra# show ip route > C>* 127.0.0.0/8 is directly connected, lo > O 192.168.0.0/24 [110/10] is directly connected, eth0, 00:18:41 > C>* 192.168.0.0/24 is directly connect, eth0 >=20 --=20 James R. Leu |