Thread: [mpls-linux-devel] QUAGGA 99.6 + LDP-Portable
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
jleu
From: <gsr...@al...> - 2007-01-08 11:53:26
|
Hi James: You'll have to forgive me, I had some important business to finish = before christmas. I've downloaded the latest quagga-mpls and ldp-portable from your P4 = repository and test it in a simple scenario with two PCs. =20 13.0.0.1 .1 10.0.0.0/24 .2 11.0.0.1 --------------PE1---------------------PE2-------------- eth1 eth0 eth1 eth0 And these are the versions of the RPMs related to MPLS and QUAGGA and = the modules I load: [root@PE2]# rpm -qa | grep mpls | sort glibc-kernheaders-3.0-5.2_mpls0.1162999872 iproute-2.6.11-1_mpls_90.1162552079 iptables-1.3.0-2_mpls_1.950d kernel-2.6.15-1.1831_FC4mpls_1.950 kernel-devel-2.6.15-1.1831_FC4mpls_1.950 quagga-0.99.6-2007010801_mpls_0.1168246002 quagga-contrib-0.99.6-2007010801_mpls_0.1168246002 quagga-debuginfo-0.99.6-2007010801_mpls_0.1168246002 quagga-devel-0.99.6-2007010801_mpls_0.1168246002 [root@PE2]# lsmod | grep mpls mpls4 5953 0 mpls 78209 2 mpls4 Now I show you the configuration and output of some commands in PE2 = (analogue in PE1): PE2# sh run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! hostname PE2 ! service integrated-vtysh-config ! debug zebra events debug zebra kernel ! password root ! interface eth0 description 11.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 11.0.0.255 ipv6 nd suppress-ra ! interface eth1 description 10.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 10.0.0.255 ipv6 nd suppress-ra mpls ip mpls labelspace 0 ! ! mpls ldp egress connected ! router ospf network 10.0.0.0/24 area 0.0.0.0 network 11.0.0.0/24 area 0.0.0.0 network 15.0.0.0/24 area 0.0.0.0 ! ip forwarding ! line vty ! PE2# sh ldp LSR-ID: 10.0.0.2 Admin State: ENABLED Transport Address: 0.0.0.0 Control Mode: ORDERED Repair Mode: GLOBAL Propogate Release: TRUE Label Merge: TRUE Retention Mode: LIBERAL Loop Detection Mode: NONE TTL-less-domain: FALSE Local TCP Port: 646 Local UDP Port: 646 Keep-alive Time: 45 Keep-alive Interval: 15 Hello Time: 15 Hello Interval: 5 PE2# sh ldp dis Local LSR Identifier: 10.0.0.2 Interface Discovery Sources: eth1: xmit/recv LDP Id: 13.0.0.1:0 Targeted Discovery Sources: No configured peers PE2# sh ldp fec FEC: 1 169.254.0.0/16 1 0.0.0.0 0 FEC: 2 10.0.0.0/24 2 0.0.0.0 1 PE2# sh ldp dat 10.0.0.0/24 local binding: label: gen 10001 10.0.0.0/24 remote binding: label: gen 10001 lsr: 13.0.0.1:0 ingress PE2# sh mpls for Insegments: Lbl Spc Label Owner 0 10001 ldp Total 1 Outsegments: Interface Label Next Hop Owner eth1 10001 10.0.0.1 ldp Total 1 Cross Connects: Total 0 PE2# sh ip route Codes: K - kernel route, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, O - OSPF, I - ISIS, B - BGP, > - selected route, * - FIB route O 10.0.0.0/24 [110/10] is directly connected, eth1, 00:06:05 C>* 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, eth1 O 11.0.0.0/24 [110/10] is directly connected, eth0, 00:06:05 C>* 11.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, eth0 O>* 13.0.0.0/24 [110/20] via 10.0.0.1, eth1, 00:05:12 C>* 127.0.0.0/8 is directly connected, lo K>* 169.254.0.0/16 is directly connected, eth1 PE2# sh ldp ses 2 1.0.0.0 45 OPERATIONAL 10.0.0.1 13.0.0.1 PE2# sh ldp dis Local LSR Identifier: 10.0.0.2 Interface Discovery Sources: eth1: xmit/recv LDP Id: 13.0.0.1:0 Targeted Discovery Sources: No configured peers PE2# sh ldp neig Peer LDP Ident: 13.0.0.1:0; Local LDP Ident: 10.0.0.2:0 TCP connection: 10.0.0.2.39560 - 10.0.0.1.646 State: OPERATIONAL; Msgs sent/recv: 26/78; UNSOLICITED Up time: 00:05:18 LDP discovery sources: eth1 Addresses bound to peer: 10.0.0.1 13.0.0.1 PE2# sh mpls hard MPLS-Linux: 1.950 netlink control PE2# sh mpls ver Version 1.950 [root@PE2]# mpls ilm ILM entry label gen 10001 labelspace 0 proto ipv4 pop peek (0 bytes, 0 pkts) [root@PE2]# mpls nhlfe NHLFE entry key 0x00000003 mtu 1496 propagate_ttl push gen 10001 set eth1 ipv4 10.0.0.1 (0 bytes, 0 pkts) [root@PE2]# ip route 10.0.0.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.0.0.2 11.0.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 11.0.0.1 13.0.0.0/24 via 10.0.0.1 dev eth1 proto zebra metric 20 The result is that, althaugh the NHLFE and ILM tables add a new entry = for 10.0.0.0/24 subnet,=20 I'm not able to send labeled packets from one host to another because IP = table doesn't change=20 to route the packets via mpls. I think we're very close to solve it, but I need your help. Thanks in advange, Gonzalo |
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2007-01-12 04:05:40
|
Looking closer at your configs and comparing to mine, there are two differences I notice. First, I configure all of my routing/MPLS interface IP addresses via vtysh. (ie the system does not configure them via /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-*) Second, I always use a dummy0 interface to establish my router-id/lsr-id Here is the important parts of my config: interface dummy0 ip address 192.168.3.2/32 ipv6 nd suppress-ra ! interface eth0 ipv6 nd suppress-ra ! interface eth1 ip address 192.168.2.2/30 ipv6 nd suppress-ra mpls ip mpls labelspace 0 ! interface eth2 ip address 192.168.4.2/29 ipv6 nd suppress-ra mpls ip mpls labelspace 0 ! mpls ldp egress connected ! router ospf passive-interface dummy0 network 192.168.2.0/30 area 0.0.0.0 network 192.168.3.2/32 area 0.0.0.0 network 192.168.4.0/29 area 0.0.0.0 You'll notice that eth0 does not have an IP in the config. This is the only interface I configure via the system. This is so that if zebra is not running I can still login to the box. But all other routing/MPLS/LDP interfaces are configured via vtysh. Give my suggestions a try and see if either fix things for you. Please let me know the results! On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 12:51:10PM +0100, Sienes Rodr?guez Gonzalo wrote: > Hi James: >=20 > You'll have to forgive me, I had some important business to finish before= christmas. >=20 > I've downloaded the latest quagga-mpls and ldp-portable from your P4 repo= sitory and >=20 > test it in a simple scenario with two PCs. >=20 > =20 >=20 > 13.0.0.1 .1 10.0.0.0/24 .2 11.0.0.1 >=20 > --------------PE1---------------------PE2-------------- >=20 > eth1 eth0 eth1 eth0 >=20 > And these are the versions of the RPMs related to MPLS and QUAGGA and the= modules I load: >=20 > [root@PE2]# rpm -qa | grep mpls | sort >=20 > glibc-kernheaders-3.0-5.2_mpls0.1162999872 >=20 > iproute-2.6.11-1_mpls_90.1162552079 >=20 > iptables-1.3.0-2_mpls_1.950d >=20 > kernel-2.6.15-1.1831_FC4mpls_1.950 >=20 > kernel-devel-2.6.15-1.1831_FC4mpls_1.950 >=20 > quagga-0.99.6-2007010801_mpls_0.1168246002 >=20 > quagga-contrib-0.99.6-2007010801_mpls_0.1168246002 >=20 > quagga-debuginfo-0.99.6-2007010801_mpls_0.1168246002 >=20 > quagga-devel-0.99.6-2007010801_mpls_0.1168246002 >=20 > [root@PE2]# lsmod | grep mpls >=20 > mpls4 5953 0 >=20 > mpls 78209 2 mpls4 >=20 > Now I show you the configuration and output of some commands in PE2 (anal= ogue in PE1): >=20 > PE2# sh run >=20 > Building configuration... >=20 > Current configuration: >=20 > ! >=20 > hostname PE2 >=20 > ! >=20 > service integrated-vtysh-config >=20 > ! >=20 > debug zebra events >=20 > debug zebra kernel >=20 > ! >=20 > password root >=20 > ! >=20 > interface eth0 >=20 > description 11.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 11.0.0.255 >=20 > ipv6 nd suppress-ra >=20 > ! >=20 > interface eth1 >=20 > description 10.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 10.0.0.255 >=20 > ipv6 nd suppress-ra >=20 > mpls ip >=20 > mpls labelspace 0 >=20 > ! >=20 > ! >=20 > mpls ldp >=20 > egress connected >=20 > ! >=20 > router ospf >=20 > network 10.0.0.0/24 area 0.0.0.0 >=20 > network 11.0.0.0/24 area 0.0.0.0 >=20 > network 15.0.0.0/24 area 0.0.0.0 >=20 > ! >=20 > ip forwarding >=20 > ! >=20 > line vty >=20 > ! >=20 > PE2# sh ldp >=20 > LSR-ID: 10.0.0.2 Admin State: ENABLED >=20 > Transport Address: 0.0.0.0 >=20 > Control Mode: ORDERED Repair Mode: GLOBAL >=20 > Propogate Release: TRUE Label Merge: TRUE >=20 > Retention Mode: LIBERAL Loop Detection Mode: NONE >=20 > TTL-less-domain: FALSE >=20 > Local TCP Port: 646 Local UDP Port: 646 >=20 > Keep-alive Time: 45 Keep-alive Interval: 15 >=20 > Hello Time: 15 Hello Interval: 5 >=20 > PE2# sh ldp dis >=20 > Local LSR Identifier: 10.0.0.2 >=20 > Interface Discovery Sources: >=20 > eth1: xmit/recv >=20 > LDP Id: 13.0.0.1:0 >=20 > Targeted Discovery Sources: >=20 > No configured peers >=20 > PE2# sh ldp fec >=20 > FEC: 1 169.254.0.0/16 >=20 > 1 0.0.0.0 0 >=20 > FEC: 2 10.0.0.0/24 >=20 > 2 0.0.0.0 1 >=20 > PE2# sh ldp dat >=20 > 10.0.0.0/24 local binding: label: gen 10001 >=20 > 10.0.0.0/24 remote binding: label: gen 10001 lsr: 13.0.0.1:0 ingress >=20 > PE2# sh mpls for >=20 > Insegments: >=20 > Lbl Spc Label Owner >=20 > 0 10001 ldp >=20 > Total 1 >=20 > Outsegments: >=20 > Interface Label Next Hop Owner >=20 > eth1 10001 10.0.0.1 ldp >=20 > Total 1 >=20 > Cross Connects: >=20 > Total 0 >=20 > PE2# sh ip route >=20 > Codes: K - kernel route, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, O - OSPF, >=20 > I - ISIS, B - BGP, > - selected route, * - FIB route >=20 > O 10.0.0.0/24 [110/10] is directly connected, eth1, 00:06:05 >=20 > C>* 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, eth1 >=20 > O 11.0.0.0/24 [110/10] is directly connected, eth0, 00:06:05 >=20 > C>* 11.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, eth0 >=20 > O>* 13.0.0.0/24 [110/20] via 10.0.0.1, eth1, 00:05:12 >=20 > C>* 127.0.0.0/8 is directly connected, lo >=20 > K>* 169.254.0.0/16 is directly connected, eth1 >=20 > PE2# sh ldp ses >=20 > 2 1.0.0.0 45 OPERATIONAL >=20 > 10.0.0.1 >=20 > 13.0.0.1 >=20 > PE2# sh ldp dis >=20 > Local LSR Identifier: 10.0.0.2 >=20 > Interface Discovery Sources: >=20 > eth1: xmit/recv >=20 > LDP Id: 13.0.0.1:0 >=20 > Targeted Discovery Sources: >=20 > No configured peers >=20 > PE2# sh ldp neig >=20 > Peer LDP Ident: 13.0.0.1:0; Local LDP Ident: 10.0.0.2:0 >=20 > TCP connection: 10.0.0.2.39560 - 10.0.0.1.646 >=20 > State: OPERATIONAL; Msgs sent/recv: 26/78; UNSOLICITED >=20 > Up time: 00:05:18 >=20 > LDP discovery sources: >=20 > eth1 >=20 > Addresses bound to peer: >=20 > 10.0.0.1 13.0.0.1 >=20 > PE2# sh mpls hard >=20 > MPLS-Linux: 1.950 netlink control >=20 > PE2# sh mpls ver >=20 > Version 1.950 >=20 > [root@PE2]# mpls ilm >=20 > ILM entry label gen 10001 labelspace 0 proto ipv4 >=20 > pop peek (0 bytes, 0 pkts) >=20 > [root@PE2]# mpls nhlfe >=20 > NHLFE entry key 0x00000003 mtu 1496 propagate_ttl >=20 > push gen 10001 set eth1 ipv4 10.0.0.1 (0 bytes, 0 pkts) >=20 > [root@PE2]# ip route >=20 > 10.0.0.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.0.0.2 >=20 > 11.0.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 11.0.0.1 >=20 > 13.0.0.0/24 via 10.0.0.1 dev eth1 proto zebra metric 20 >=20 > The result is that, althaugh the NHLFE and ILM tables add a new entry for= 10.0.0.0/24 subnet,=20 >=20 > I'm not able to send labeled packets from one host to another because IP = table doesn't change=20 >=20 > to route the packets via mpls. >=20 > I think we're very close to solve it, but I need your help. >=20 > Thanks in advange, >=20 > Gonzalo >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share y= our > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3D= DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-devel mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-devel --=20 James R. Leu jl...@mi... |
From: <gsr...@al...> - 2007-02-28 09:58:09
|
Hi again: I have configured a simple scenario. And the result, is that I'm able to = create mpls segments from vtysh. In the sender I type: ip route 12.0.0.1 = gen 222 nexthop eth1 10.0.0.1, and in the receiver: mpls static 0 -> = label-map gen 222 pop. With ping from sender to 12.1 I can see that the = ICMP packets are labelled. Also I can see the new mpls segment created = by mpls nhlfe show and mpls ilm show. So the problem must be at configuring LDP, as I told you in the "running = config" doesn't appear mpls ip (at the required interface) or the = general command mpls ldp. Thanks, Gonzalo -----Mensaje original----- De: James R. Leu [mailto:jl...@mi...] Enviado el: lun 26/02/2007 15:08 Para: Sienes Rodr=EDguez Gonzalo CC: mpl...@li... Asunto: Re: [mpls-linux-devel] New MPLS-Linux code =20 On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 11:32:15AM +0100, Sienes Rodr?guez Gonzalo = wrote: > Hi James! >=20 > I've installed the revised RPMs for FC4. I got kernel panic after = rebooting the system that I solved by typing "enforcing=3D0" at = grub.conf. I have some problems with the wheel of the mouse or the USB = ports but in general it works right. I'm able to create MPLS static = configurations. In this version the "mpls" module has disappeared so I = only load "mpls4". I launch zebra, ospfd and ldpd but I make the whole = configuration by vtysh. OSPF works well but I can't put most of the ldpd = commands, in fact, the only one that appears with "show running-config" = is "mpls labelspace 0" in the corresponding interface, Neither "mpls = ldp" nor "mpls ip". Are these problems solved in FC5? If that's it I = would like to work with FC5. Can you manually create MPLS segments with the 'mpls' command? I'll look into the issue with no ldp command in vtysh. > Thanks, >=20 > Gonzalo. >=20 > I updated the FC4 kernel RPMs. Can you please try them? >=20 > On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 11:47:24AM +0100, Sienes Rodr?guez Gonzalo = wrote: > > Hi James: > >=20 > > I'm trying to install your new software for FC4 but I have some = problems. > > When I try to install the kernel-2.6.18 from Source Forge for FC4 it = makes me install lots of RPMs, most of them can be installed by "yum = update" but I can't find the libraries libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) and = libpcap.so.0.9.3 anywhere for FC4. I search for them and people talks = about 64 architecture and I'm working with Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU = 3.00GHz. Could you provide them to me? Witch OS are you using? Should I = install FC5? =20 > >=20 > > Thanks in advance. > >=20 > > P.D.: These are the outputs I get. > >=20 > > [root@PE3 mpls-linux-1.955]# rpm -ivh = kernel-2.6.18-1.2257.fc4.mpls.1.955.i686.rpm > > error: Failed dependencies: > > mkinitrd >=3D 4.2.21-1 is needed by = kernel-2.6.18-1.2257.fc4.mpls.1.955.i686 > > isdn4k-utils < 3.2-32 conflicts with = kernel-2.6.18-1.2257.fc4.mpls.1.955.i686 > > kudzu < 1.2.5 conflicts with = kernel-2.6.18-1.2257.fc4.mpls.1.955.i686 > >=20 > > [root@PE3 Requeridos]# rpm -ivh mkinitrd-4.2.21-1.i386.rpm > > error: Failed dependencies: > > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) is needed by mkinitrd-4.2.21-1.i386 > >=20 > > [root@PE3 Requeridos]# rpm -ivh isdn4k-utils-3.2-32.i386.rpm > > error: Failed dependencies: > > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) is needed by isdn4k-utils-3.2-32.i386 > > libpcap.so.0.9.3 is needed by isdn4k-utils-3.2-32.i386 > >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > James R. Leu > jl...@mi... >=20 >=20 >=20 --=20 James R. Leu jl...@mi... |
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2007-03-01 03:05:39
|
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 10:56:10AM +0100, Sienes Rodr?guez Gonzalo wrote: > Hi again: >=20 > I have configured a simple scenario. And the result, is that I'm able to = create mpls segments from vtysh. In the sender I type: ip route 12.0.0.1 ge= n 222 nexthop eth1 10.0.0.1, and in the receiver: mpls static 0 -> label-ma= p gen 222 pop. With ping from sender to 12.1 I can see that the ICMP packet= s are labelled. Also I can see the new mpls segment created by mpls nhlfe s= how and mpls ilm show. > So the problem must be at configuring LDP, as I told you in the "running = config" doesn't appear mpls ip (at the required interface) or the general c= ommand mpls ldp. OK. Thanks for the feedback. I'll look into it. > Thanks, > Gonzalo >=20 >=20 > -----Mensaje original----- > De: James R. Leu [mailto:jl...@mi...] > Enviado el: lun 26/02/2007 15:08 > Para: Sienes Rodr?guez Gonzalo > CC: mpl...@li... > Asunto: Re: [mpls-linux-devel] New MPLS-Linux code > =20 > On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 11:32:15AM +0100, Sienes Rodr?guez Gonzalo wrote: > > Hi James! > >=20 > > I've installed the revised RPMs for FC4. I got kernel panic after reboo= ting the system that I solved by typing "enforcing=3D0" at grub.conf. I hav= e some problems with the wheel of the mouse or the USB ports but in general= it works right. I'm able to create MPLS static configurations. In this ver= sion the "mpls" module has disappeared so I only load "mpls4". I launch zeb= ra, ospfd and ldpd but I make the whole configuration by vtysh. OSPF works = well but I can't put most of the ldpd commands, in fact, the only one that = appears with "show running-config" is "mpls labelspace 0" in the correspond= ing interface, Neither "mpls ldp" nor "mpls ip". Are these problems solved = in FC5? If that's it I would like to work with FC5. >=20 > Can you manually create MPLS segments with the 'mpls' command? > I'll look into the issue with no ldp command in vtysh. >=20 > > Thanks, > >=20 > > Gonzalo. > >=20 > > I updated the FC4 kernel RPMs. Can you please try them? > >=20 > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 11:47:24AM +0100, Sienes Rodr?guez Gonzalo wrot= e: > > > Hi James: > > >=20 > > > I'm trying to install your new software for FC4 but I have some probl= ems. > > > When I try to install the kernel-2.6.18 from Source Forge for FC4 it = makes me install lots of RPMs, most of them can be installed by "yum update= " but I can't find the libraries libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) and libpcap.so.0.9.3 = anywhere for FC4. I search for them and people talks about 64 architecture = and I'm working with Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.00GHz. Could you provide t= hem to me? Witch OS are you using? Should I install FC5? =20 > > >=20 > > > Thanks in advance. > > >=20 > > > P.D.: These are the outputs I get. > > >=20 > > > [root@PE3 mpls-linux-1.955]# rpm -ivh kernel-2.6.18-1.2257.fc4.mpls.1= .955.i686.rpm > > > error: Failed dependencies: > > > mkinitrd >=3D 4.2.21-1 is needed by kernel-2.6.18-1.2257.fc4.= mpls.1.955.i686 > > > isdn4k-utils < 3.2-32 conflicts with kernel-2.6.18-1.2257.fc4= .mpls.1.955.i686 > > > kudzu < 1.2.5 conflicts with kernel-2.6.18-1.2257.fc4.mpls.1.= 955.i686 > > >=20 > > > [root@PE3 Requeridos]# rpm -ivh mkinitrd-4.2.21-1.i386.rpm > > > error: Failed dependencies: > > > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) is needed by mkinitrd-4.2.21-1.i386 > > >=20 > > > [root@PE3 Requeridos]# rpm -ivh isdn4k-utils-3.2-32.i386.rpm > > > error: Failed dependencies: > > > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) is needed by isdn4k-utils-3.2-32.i386 > > > libpcap.so.0.9.3 is needed by isdn4k-utils-3.2-32.i386 > > >=20 > >=20 > >=20 > >=20 > > --=20 > > James R. Leu > > jl...@mi... > >=20 > >=20 > >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > James R. Leu > jl...@mi... >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share y= our > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3D= DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-devel mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-devel --=20 James R. Leu jl...@mi... |
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2007-03-01 03:24:43
|
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 10:56:10AM +0100, Sienes Rodr?guez Gonzalo wrote: > Hi again: >=20 > I have configured a simple scenario. And the result, is that I'm able to = create mpls segments from vtysh. In the sender I type: ip route 12.0.0.1 ge= n 222 nexthop eth1 10.0.0.1, and in the receiver: mpls static 0 -> label-ma= p gen 222 pop. With ping from sender to 12.1 I can see that the ICMP packet= s are labelled. Also I can see the new mpls segment created by mpls nhlfe s= how and mpls ilm show. > So the problem must be at configuring LDP, as I told you in the "running = config" doesn't appear mpls ip (at the required interface) or the general c= ommand mpls ldp. I built a FC4 chroot environment and installed the quagga-mpls FC4 rpms inside of it and launched zebra/ldpd/ospfd. Using vtysh I can able to configure: -bash-3.00# md5sum quagga-0.99.6-01.fc4.mpls.1.955.i386.rpm=20 2187b703d908784b2c03d836086fc607 quagga-0.99.6-01.fc4.mpls.1.955.i386.rpm -bash-3.00# rpm -qa | grep quagga quagga-0.99.6-01.fc4.mpls.1.955 -bash-3.00# more /etc/fedora-release=20 Fedora Core release 4 (Stentz) -bash-3.00# vtysh Hello, this is Quagga (version 0.99.6). Copyright 1996-2005 Kunihiro Ishiguro, et al. koko# conf t koko(config)# mpls ldp=20 koko(config-ldp)# exit koko(config-ldp)# exit koko(config-if)# mpls ip koko(config-if-ldp)# end koko# sho ldp discovery=20 Local LSR Identifier: 192.168.1.16 Interface Discovery Sources: eth0: xmit Targeted Discovery Sources: No configured peers koko#=20 Please verify which version of the RPM you have installed, which=20 vtysh your running and include the commands your using for starting the processes. Here is what I did to get it up and running after installing the RPM: echo "hostname "`hostname -s` > /etc/quagga/zebra.conf echo "hostname "`hostname -s` > /etc/quagga/ospfd.conf echo "hostname "`hostname -s` > /etc/quagga/ldpd.conf chown quagga.quagga /etc/quagga/zebra.conf /etc/quagga/ospfd.conf /etc/quag= ga/ldpd.conf service zebra start service ospfd start service ldpd start vtysh > Thanks, > Gonzalo >=20 >=20 > -----Mensaje original----- > De: James R. Leu [mailto:jl...@mi...] > Enviado el: lun 26/02/2007 15:08 > Para: Sienes Rodr?guez Gonzalo > CC: mpl...@li... > Asunto: Re: [mpls-linux-devel] New MPLS-Linux code > =20 > On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 11:32:15AM +0100, Sienes Rodr?guez Gonzalo wrote: > > Hi James! > >=20 > > I've installed the revised RPMs for FC4. I got kernel panic after reboo= ting the system that I solved by typing "enforcing=3D0" at grub.conf. I hav= e some problems with the wheel of the mouse or the USB ports but in general= it works right. I'm able to create MPLS static configurations. In this ver= sion the "mpls" module has disappeared so I only load "mpls4". I launch zeb= ra, ospfd and ldpd but I make the whole configuration by vtysh. OSPF works = well but I can't put most of the ldpd commands, in fact, the only one that = appears with "show running-config" is "mpls labelspace 0" in the correspond= ing interface, Neither "mpls ldp" nor "mpls ip". Are these problems solved = in FC5? If that's it I would like to work with FC5. >=20 > Can you manually create MPLS segments with the 'mpls' command? > I'll look into the issue with no ldp command in vtysh. >=20 > > Thanks, > >=20 > > Gonzalo. > >=20 > > I updated the FC4 kernel RPMs. Can you please try them? > >=20 > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 11:47:24AM +0100, Sienes Rodr?guez Gonzalo wrot= e: > > > Hi James: > > >=20 > > > I'm trying to install your new software for FC4 but I have some probl= ems. > > > When I try to install the kernel-2.6.18 from Source Forge for FC4 it = makes me install lots of RPMs, most of them can be installed by "yum update= " but I can't find the libraries libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) and libpcap.so.0.9.3 = anywhere for FC4. I search for them and people talks about 64 architecture = and I'm working with Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.00GHz. Could you provide t= hem to me? Witch OS are you using? Should I install FC5? =20 > > >=20 > > > Thanks in advance. > > >=20 > > > P.D.: These are the outputs I get. > > >=20 > > > [root@PE3 mpls-linux-1.955]# rpm -ivh kernel-2.6.18-1.2257.fc4.mpls.1= .955.i686.rpm > > > error: Failed dependencies: > > > mkinitrd >=3D 4.2.21-1 is needed by kernel-2.6.18-1.2257.fc4.= mpls.1.955.i686 > > > isdn4k-utils < 3.2-32 conflicts with kernel-2.6.18-1.2257.fc4= .mpls.1.955.i686 > > > kudzu < 1.2.5 conflicts with kernel-2.6.18-1.2257.fc4.mpls.1.= 955.i686 > > >=20 > > > [root@PE3 Requeridos]# rpm -ivh mkinitrd-4.2.21-1.i386.rpm > > > error: Failed dependencies: > > > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) is needed by mkinitrd-4.2.21-1.i386 > > >=20 > > > [root@PE3 Requeridos]# rpm -ivh isdn4k-utils-3.2-32.i386.rpm > > > error: Failed dependencies: > > > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) is needed by isdn4k-utils-3.2-32.i386 > > > libpcap.so.0.9.3 is needed by isdn4k-utils-3.2-32.i386 > > >=20 > >=20 > >=20 > >=20 > > --=20 > > James R. Leu > > jl...@mi... > >=20 > >=20 > >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > James R. Leu > jl...@mi... >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share y= our > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3D= DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-devel mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-devel --=20 James R. Leu jl...@mi... |