Re: [mpls-linux-general] why there are no patches for 1.958?

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

I'm not understanding the issue yet.  Can you provide an
ASCII drawing or a list of commands that would exemplify
what your seeing?

On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 09:17:44AM -0500, Chris Robson wrote:
>=20
> James
>=20
> Just an FYI on Explicit null label testing this morning, sorry if this=20
> is old hat for anyone.=20
>=20
> I was having a problem getting it to work even though the "mpls ilm=20
> show" was stating the correct pop was configured, incoming packets=20
> appeared not to be routed via kernel after the pop.  It turns out there=
=20
> is an issue with targeting the "dummy0" interface.  Once I changed to a=
=20
> real ethX interface owned by the target router the expected action=20
> occurred, that is, pinging  from one  linux router where labels are=20
> applied to the target IP to the targeted linux route's interface IP,=20
> ergo explicit null action.
>=20
> Command sequence is:  (NOTE 10.128.3.253 can not be a dummy0 interface)
>=20
> Source router
> mpls nhlfe add key 0 instructions push gen 1006 nexthop eth8 ipv4=20
> 10.128.0.137
> ip route add 10.128.3.253/32 via 10.128.0.137 mpls 0x2 =20
> mpls labelspace set dev eth8 labelspace 0
>=20
> Target router:
> mpls ilm add label gen 1006 labelspace 0
>=20
> --=20
> Christopher Robson
> Senior Computer Scientist, GS-15
> Naval Research Laboratory
> Center for Computational Science
> Networking, Code 5591
> 4555 Overlook ave.
> Washington, D.C. 20375-5320
> (COM) 202-404-3138
> (VoIP) 2024043138@GIGEF
> (CHAT) Chris.Robson@GIGEF
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-linux-general mailing list
> mpl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general

--=20
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...