Re: [mpls-linux-general] RFC 2547BIS (MPLS+VRF)

[Jon A. <ne...@gm...>]

Hi James!!

I'll send it to you next week. Now we are trying to solve a bug related wit=
h=20
rt_cache and multiple VRFs with same IPs.

We have also added a new feature to the patch. Now you can associate one=20
incoming label with a VRF and deliver IP traffic to the PE.

El Wednesday 10 October 2007 12:48:58 James R. Leu escribi=C3=B3:
> Glad to hear you're making progress.  I'd be glad to take your patch
> and integrate it into the appropriate trees.
>
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 12:33:27PM +0200, Jon Ander wrote:
> > Hi everybody!
> >
> > I'm working in MPLS & VRF projects trying to merge them.
> >
> > I would like to inform all of you that we have merged them into a patch
> > and probed it in a virtual scenario under 2.6.18.1 kernel.
> >
> > The scenario is based on IPv4 MPLS example
> > (http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=3D31116&group_id=
=3D15443
> > ).
> > We have added two more Hosts, one connected to LER1 and the second one =
to
> > LER2. Then we have created two VRFs in both LERs, each one of them
> > associated to one Host in each LER. Then we have tried to ping from one
> > side of the network to the other side and it works fine.
> >
> > Now we are trying to implement a more complex scenario based on
> > aggregated mode.
> >
> > I will send our patch to James next week if he wants.
> >
> > --
> > Saludos!
> > Jon Ander
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------=
=2D-
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> > Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
> > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
> > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
> > _______________________________________________
> > mpls-linux-general mailing list
> > mpl...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general



=2D-=20
Saludos

Jon Ander