Re: [mpls-linux-general] Question regarding MPLS tunnels and tunnel command is not working.
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
jleu
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2005-12-10 03:19:22
|
I think you are talking about RSVP-TE signaled 'tunnels' MPLS Linux does not yet have a RSVP-TE implementation. On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 03:39:19PM -0500, Siddhardha N. Garige wrote: > Hi, > I am trying to understand MPLS tunnel concept and according to RFC 3812,= an > explicitly routed LSP (ERLSP) is referred to as an MPLS tunnel. I am > planning to connecting my router (CE) to a PE on a T1 link using MPLS > tunnel. I have only source and destination nodes and i am setting up a L= SP > in between them. I dont have any intermediate nodes. Destination node is = in > one hop reach. If i make this LSP into a tunnel will it be conceptually > right? >=20 > My understanding of Explicit routing is you have various paths available > from source to destination and you specify a specific path. Since i have > only one path here, it is no different from regular LSP. Can someone expl= ain > to me PLs? >=20 > Also, I compiled and installed MPLS kernel and i was able to setup LSP in > between two linux boxes. I am trying to create a tunnel using mpls tunnel > command and i am having some trouble. Here is a screen shot.. >=20 > root@darkstar:/home/sid# mplsversion > 1.950 >=20 > root@darkstar:/usr/sbin# mpls nhlfe add key 0 > NHLFE entry key 0x00000003 mtu 0 propagate_ttl > (0 bytes, 0 pkts) > root@darkstar:/usr/sbin# mpls tunnel add dev eth0 nhlfe 0x3 > Option "add" is unknown, try "mpls -help". >=20 > any help? >=20 >=20 > Thanks, > Sid --=20 James R. Leu jl...@mi... |