Re: [mpls-linux-general] how much of LDP is actually working?

[Razvan D. <raz...@gm...>]

On 8/10/05, Razvan Deaconescu <raz...@gm...> wrote:
> On 8/10/05, James R. Leu <jl...@mi...> wrote:
> >
> > I would say 95% of the protocol is implemented.  The parts that are
> > missing are related to Notification messages.  In addition I haven't
> > looked over 3036bis yet to see what other changes are needed.
> >
> > If you're serious about trying to help the first thing to understand
> > is that the quagga porting layer is modeled after juniper's use of LDP.
> > In other words don't expect label distribution for every route in the
> > routing table, only for those which are directly connected to a LDP spe=
aker.
> > Also I think there is a bug in the MPLS infrastructure for FTN bindings=
.
> >
> > Give me some output of show commands and an explanation of what you
> > would expect to see and we can decide where to focus a bug hunt.
> >
> > --
> > James R. Leu
> > jl...@mi...
> >
> >
> >
>

hi,

i've managed to remove the errors that showed up at the configuration
(it had to do with an outdated version of automake); i've recompiled
my patched quagga-0.98.0 but the ouput is still the same (no
outlabels); i've also recompiled quagga-mpls, but, just as before,
ospf isn't working (the routers keep sending hello messages but
without reply)

i've also put my topology figure at
http://atlantis.cs.pub.ro/~razvand/ldpd-output.txt
as i saw it was pretty messed up

Razvan