Re: [mpls-linux-general] Again about labelspaces and interfaces

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 09:22:41AM -0300, Josdeyvi Russi wrote:
> Hi Leu,
>=20
> Sorry asking it again to you, but I?m really trying to understand the lab=
elspace concept in MPLS for Linux.=20
>=20
> Now that you can have the number of packets and bytes that one ILM entry =
receive, what means when you have two or more interfaces at the same labels=
pace?
> =20
> I don?t know, but I was thinking if the best was not allowing two or more=
 interfaces with the same labelspace. In fact, there is one statement at th=
e Developer?s guide that say that this implementation was to be labelspace =
per-interface and not per-plataform.

> What do you think?

I believe my implementation of labelspace is as flexible as any developer
could desire.  If a developer chooses to assign only one interface
per labelspace, so be it, my implementation will not stop them.  If they
would like to add muliple interfaces to a labelspace, my implementation
supports it.

The current implementation is elegant in it's simplicity for handling
the global labelspace and hierarchy.

Is there some feature you are looking for that cannot be handle with the
current implementation?

> By the way, did you saw the "pops" bug I sent? It is really a bug or I?m =
wrong?

Yes it is a bug.  I have yet to have time in which to fix it.

> Thank you,
>=20
> Josdeyvi
--=20
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...