[mpls-linux-general] A question of ldp-portable-0.800

[<m9...@cn...>]

Hi,

I have a question between ldp-portable-0.310 and ldp-portable-0.800.
The programmer uses "struct mpls_interface" in ldp-portable-0.310 patch =
file, but "stuct ldp_interface" in ldp-portable-0.800 patch file.
It seems that there is no data member named ldp in ldp_interface.h, so =
all related commands in ldp_vty.c were marked by #if 0.
Why to change that?=20


ldp_vty.c - 0.310=20

DEFUN(ldp_if_remote_tcp_port,
      ldp_if_remote_tcp_port_cmd,
      "remote-tcp-port <1-65535>",
      "MPLS interface configuration\n"
      "remote LDP port\n"
      "port number\n") {
  struct interface *ifp =3D vty->index;
  struct mpls_interface *mi =3D (struct mpls_interface*)ifp->info;
  struct ldp_interface *li =3D mi->ldp;


ldp_vty.c - 0.800=20

DEFUN(ldp_if_remote_tcp_port,
      ldp_if_remote_tcp_port_cmd,
      "remote-tcp-port <1-65535>",
      "MPLS interface configuration\n"
      "remote LDP port\n"
      "port number\n")
{
  struct interface *ifp =3D vty->index;
  struct ldp_interface *li =3D (struct ldp_interface*)ifp->info;
  struct ldp *ldp =3D li->ldp;



ldp_interface.h - there is no data member named ldp

struct ldp_interface {
    struct interface *ifp;
    struct connected *connected;
    struct l2cc_interface *l2cc;

    ldp_entity entity;
    ldp_if iff;
    mpls_bool configured;
    mpls_bool admin_up;
    mpls_bool create_on_hold;
    int labelspace;
};



Thanks.

Timothy
2005.01.06