Re: [mpls-linux-general] Problem with ip route + lsp
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
jleu
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2004-12-07 15:50:55
|
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 04:18:12PM -0500, Alexandra Alvarado wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks, now the MPLS-Linux example (http://perso.enst.fr/~casellas/mpls-linux/index.html) is working. But, what is the real advantage? where can I apply the mpls? What is the sense to have MPLS in to PCs with the same network? > > I would like to apply this between two remote linux!. I Have for example two simple tunnel linux servers, each of one in differents cities with some routers in the middle, and I can make a vpn without ipsec between two remote edge with differents networks. The only disadvantage > is that I can't repeat de networks more than once. MPLS improve this?, and if do; can you help me with some examples? I do not quite follow what your points are. One of the main advantage of MPLS is the ability to tunnel traffic through a network. For example I can tunnel Layer 2 frames (ethernet) over an LSP to create a transparent ethernet link across a MPLS network. I can also connect pockets of private address space to each other by tunneling the packets through an MPLS network. Does this help answer your questions? > > > Thanks for your help. > > > Alexandra Alvarado > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Alexandra Alvarado > To: mpl...@li... ; Alexandra Alvarado > Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 5:29 PM > Subject: [mpls-linux-general] Problem with ip route + lsp > > > Hello, > > I have installed in my linux fedora core 2 the next package: > > iproute-2.4.7-14mpls_1_935 > mplsadm2-1.935-1 > iptables-1.2.9-2.3.1mpls_1_938 > quagga-0.96.4-1.1mpls_1_935 > kernel-sourcecode-2.6.8-1.521mpls_1_938a > mplsadm2-1.938-1 > kernel-2.6.6-1.435.2.3skas3_mpls_1_935 > iptables-1.2.9-2.3.1mpls_1_935 > iptables-ipv6-1.2.9-2.3.1mpls_1_935 > glibc-kernheaders-2.4-8.44mpls > > After reboot the machine, I tried to configure the example: > > [root@mplsa 1_935]# mplsadm2 -A -O 0 > MPLSADM mplsadm.c:692:main: Out segment input: 0 > Key: 0x00000003 > Out Segment add: Success > [root@mplsa 1_935]# > > [root@mplsa 1_935]# mplsadm2 -O 0x3 -o push:gen:16:set:eth0:ipv4:128.104.18.114 > MPLSADM mplsadm.c:692:main: Out segment input: 0x3 > MPLSADM mplsadm.c:688:main: Out instr input: push:gen:16:set:eth0:ipv4:128.104.18.114 > MPLSADM mplsadm.c:292:fill_instructions: Instruction: push > MPLSADM mplsadm.c:229:fill_label: Label type: gen > MPLSADM mplsadm.c:292:fill_instructions: Instruction: set > MPLSADM mplsadm.c:181:parse_nh_info: eth0 > MPLSADM mplsadm.c:182:parse_nh_info: 128.104.18.114 > MPLSADM mplsadm.c:204:parse_nh_info: Nexthop protocol: ipv4 > MPLSADM mplsadm.c:596:fill_instructions: Length: 2 > Out Instr: Success > You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/root > [root@mplsa 1_935]# > > The problem is HERE: > [root@mplsa 1_935]# ip route add 128.104.18.114/32 via 128.104.18.114 lsp 0x3 > Error: either "to" is duplicate, or "lsp" is a garbage. > [root@mplsa 1_935]# > > Why, I installed iproute-2.4.7-14mpls_1_935, and other version with lsp patch without succes? > > Can somebody say to me what is the problem or missconfiguration? > > Thanks > > > Alexandra Alvarado > > -- James R. Leu jl...@mi... |