Re: [mpls-linux-general] iptables traffic eng.
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
jleu
|
From: Zordan A. <zor...@gm...> - 2004-03-29 14:30:17
|
> Why do you want to use FORWARD entries? I've only tried using > MPLS + iptables in OUTPUT entries. FORWARD entries haven't gone through > IPv4 output processing and are not ready to be hadned off to another > layer (ie MPLS). Do things work as expected if you remove the FORWARD > entries? i've set up a mpls-routing net ... each edge router is a gateway for one of the 192.168*** net ... now i wan't to "tunnel" the mpls-net to connect to the net of the second ler. this doesn't work without forwarding-entrys, 'cause otherwise the arp request isn't labled and cannot be routed correctly through the network ! e.g. i have a computer with the ip 192.168.0.1 connected on ler1 this one should connect to 192.168.1.1 on ler2. To set up the connection the 0.1 send a packet with the arp who-has request to ler1 ... without any forwarding entry this router sends the packet unlabled into the network and because he doesn't have a direct connection to 1.1 he returned no arp-reply. If i entered an iptables-entry as described earlier he labled simply each incoming packet from 0.1 and route it through the net, so it can be recieved by 1.1 ... -- +++ NEU bei GMX und erstmalig in Deutschland: TÜV-geprüfter Virenschutz +++ 100% Virenerkennung nach Wildlist. Infos: http://www.gmx.net/virenschutz |