Re: [mpls-linux-general] zebra ldp don't work for [static] but now OSPF....
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
jleu
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2003-02-18 23:41:12
|
See comments within. On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 12:02:56AM +0100, Markus Hennig wrote: <snip> > ok, i changed the config for mplsd (ospfd and zebra stays!): I think you will need to change OSPF as well. Without changing OSPF LDP is presented with 2 equal cost OSPF routes, this is the fundamental problem for the multipath case. > > > .--------LSR_2 IN:74 OUT:10 > / \ > / LSR_5 IN:119 OUT:10 > / / / > / IN:32 / / > ----LER_1 OUT:5 LSR_3 LER_7 IN:53 OUT:1 > IN:77 \ | \ > OUT:2 \ | \ > IN:98 OUT:5 LSR_6 | > / | > LSR_4-----------' > IN:17 OUT:7 > > |----------- MPLS ------------| > > > > >>my testsetup: > >> > >> .--------LSR_2-----------. > >> / \ | > >> / LSR_5 | > >> / / \ | / > >> / / \ | / > >>----LER_1--------LSR_3 LER_7 > >> \ \ / | \ > >> \ \ / | \ > >> \ LSR_6 | > >> \ / | > >> '--------LSR_4-----------' > >> > >> |----------- MPLS ------------| > > > > > > Evil. Lets try walking before running. Simplify the topo and let me know > > if you still see so much instability. > > > looks more stable (there are some mystic things with not available nics > during startup of ospf - maybe its ulm_swicth, after a ping they are gone) > > numbers of incoming/outgoig see above > all numbers are slow growing (and sometimes decreasing) > > > Eventually mplsd will be able to support this type of 'complex' topo, but > its ok, there is no need for > > I'm not there yet. Maybe with you help we can nail down some of the real > > troubled areas. > i do my best... > > thx in advance, > markus > > > > > Thanks > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general -- James R. Leu |