Re: [mpls-linux-general] ldp_linux don't work for [static] README.sample environment!

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 12:55:06AM +0100, Markus Hennig wrote:
> Hi all,
>=20
> any news about this?
>=20
> Looks like with CVS revision 1.16 (local p4 tree @274) its still not=20
> working...
>=20
> Any (simple) workaround?
>=20
> Thx in advance,
> Markus

The title has me a bit confused.  ldp_linux no longer exists, the only wa=
y
I provide for you to run LDP is with zebra. (using the mplsd daemon).

As far as I know mplsd can create LSPs correctly for the intended environ=
ment
(LSPs being setup for the LDP Identifier) in DU ordered control.  Of cour=
se
not every one understands the ramifications of that statment.

Start out by describing what you are trying to do, what you are observing
and what you expected to see.  Please include a ascii drawing of you setu=
p.

>=20
> James R. Leu wrote:
> > The problem you are seeing (LSP setup in one direction) is a know
> > problem.  I'm working on a fix in the zebra<->ldp-portable version
> > (grab it from CVS to see the progress thus far)
> >=20
> > Jim
> >=20
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 01:20:42AM -0300, Morvan Daniel M=FCller wrot=
e:
> >  > Hello all!
> >  >
> >  > I want to make ldp-linux work for this simple testbed:
> >  >
> >  > My testbed configuration is:
> >  > hostA           LERA           CORE           LERB           hostB
> >  >                 10.1.0.2/24----10.1.0.1/24    10.2.1.1/24----10.2.=
1.2/24
> >  > 10.1.1.2/24-----10.1.1.1/24    10.2.0.1/24----10.2.0.2/24  =20
> >  >
> >  > I'am using only host static routes to make hostA and hostB are=20
> > reacheable to each other.
> >  > Static Routes added at:
> >  > LERA:
> >  > route add 10.2.1.2/32 gw 10.1.0.1
> >  > LERB:
> >  > route add 10.1.1.2/32 gw 10.2.0.1
> >  > CORE:
> >  > route add 10.1.1.2/32 gw 10.1.0.2
> >  > route add 10.2.1.2/32 gw 10.2.0.2
> >  >=20
> >  > For tests I use the command "traceroute" with:
> >  >  IP_only (ip_forwarding)
> >  >  LDP: "mpls-adm" and "ldp-linux".
> >  >
> >  > I were Waiting this Results:
> >  > traceroute -n from hostA to host B: may show 4 hops with standard =
IP,=20
> > an 3 hops with LDP (mpls_adm or ldp_linux).
> >  >
> >  > For IP  (ip_forwarding only) it's ok - 4 hops.
> >  > For LDP using "mpls_adm" it's ok - 3 hops
> >  > For LDP using "ldp_linux" IT NEVER WORK!!!!!!!!!!
> >  >=20
> >  > I see that "ldp_linux" only create the LSP for one direction (from=
 A=20
> > to B)!
> >  > Like documentation "ldp_linux" create LSPs basead on the L3=20
> > information (so, static routes created above should result in LSPs=20
> > created in two directions)!
> >  >
> >  > I follow README.sample commands, but for the sample environment it=
=20
> > too don't work!
> >  >
> >  > If some one in this mailing list had sucessfull configured=20
> > "ldp_linux" in such environment
> >  > or like README.sample and the LSPs are dinamically create for two=20
> > directions, please let me know!
> >  >
> >  > Morvan.
> >  >
> >  > _______________________________________________________________
> >  >
> >  > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> >  > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -=20
> > http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=3Dosdntextlink
> >  >
> >  > _______________________________________________
> >  > mpls-linux-general mailing list
> >  > mpl...@li...
> >  > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general
> >=20
> > --
> > James R. Leu
> >=20

--=20
James R. Leu