RES: [mpls-linux-general] Actual Labelling of Packets with Zebra+LDP/MPLS
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
jleu
|
From: <pp...@cp...> - 2002-11-12 16:55:34
|
Is the iproute2 patching essential? Pl=EDnio de Paula UNICAMP/Brazil -----Mensagem original----- De: James R. Leu [mailto:jl...@ne...] Enviada em: sexta-feira, 8 de novembro de 2002 02:21 Para: Pl=EDnio de Paula Cc: mpl...@li... Assunto: Re: [mpls-linux-general] Actual Labelling of Packets with Zebra+LDP/MPLS If you have compiled it with netlink the routes should already have the label binding done. To see if LDP has exchanged labels for routes, check the output of 'show ip route' from the zebra daemon. Then check the output of 'ip route show' (this is the ip from a MPLS patched iproute2). If the output from zebra doesn't show LSP info, then check your OSPF and LDP config. If the output from 'ip' doesn show LSP info, then make sure you've compiled zebra with netlink support. On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 04:54:34PM -0200, Pl=EDnio de Paula wrote: > Hello People, >=20 > I have successfully installed LDP + Zebra and they are now exchaning = routes with labels... > What do I need to do the real labelling of packets in the ingress = node? > Does MPLS-patched iproute2 label the packets in the ingress node with = zebra+ldp automatically? >=20 > Pl=EDnio de Paula > UNICAMP/Brazil >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm=20 > Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general --=20 James R. Leu |