Re: [mpls-linux-general] LDP config... confused!
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
jleu
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2002-10-14 19:49:11
|
Do you have some other routing protocol running? LDP out labels only get installed for FECs that match an existing route entry. On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 04:01:00PM +0100, Sameer Gharat wrote: > Hello James and all, > > I included a dummy interface with a /32 address and > tried the procedure over again. It worked!! ... though > only partially, as it created incoming labels on both > the hosts that I was working on. But it did not create > any outgoing labels. > > Any reason, why this should happen? > > thanks in advance! > > cheers, > Sameer > > --- "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> wrote: > The > default behavior for zebra-ldp is to only > > distribute labels for > > the LSR-ID (this can be changed, but only > > programitically). The LSR-ID > > must be attached to a directly connected interface > > and must show up as > > a /32 in the routing table (this is probably a > > little too strict, I need to > > tweak these rules). So the easiest way is to use a > > 'dummy' interface. > > Compile your kernel with support for it, then assign > > a /32 to it through zebra. > > Configure OSPF to run passive on the dummy > > interface. You should then see > > that LDP distruibutes labels for the /32s. > > > > Jim > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > Missed your favourite TV serial last night? Try the new, Yahoo! TV. > visit http://in.tv.yahoo.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general -- James R. Leu |