[mpls-linux-general] ldp_linux add route question
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
jleu
From: Igor V. <ch...@fl...> - 2002-06-19 20:35:06
|
Hello all, Consider this setup: LER2------LSR1-------LER1 Let's assume LER2 is the egress for FEC1. LSR1's IP routing table contains FEC1, (with LER2 as a gw). LDP session establishes between LER2 and LSR1, and LER2 transmits a label for FEC1 to LSR1. Now, inside ldp_linux daemon on LSR1, I type prompt>add route FEC1/32 LER1 How does LDP consider this now: a) LER2 is no longer next hop for FEC1, LER1 is the new next hop for FEC1 b) LER1 and LER2 are both valid next hops for FEC1 ? I tested this setup. If LER1 is also the egress for FEC1, and LDP session establishes between LER1 and LSR1, I get 2 labels for the same FEC on LSR1. I tested this in conservative retention mode, but I'm uncertain how ldp understands the "add route" inside the daemon. If a) is the case, then LSR1 should issue a label release message for the FEC, which it does not. Thanks in advance, Igor Vukomanovic |