Re: [mpls-linux-general] Some Simple questions
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
jleu
From: lingdong li <lin...@ya...> - 2002-01-30 15:18:19
|
--- "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> wrote: > It means your routing tables don't have routes that > point at each other. > > Jim Just as follow: dummy0 --------- eth0 eth0 -------- dummy0 <-----| LER 1 |------------------| LER B |---->- --------- -------- First I set up the Devices. On Ler 1: ifconfig eth0 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 10.0.0.255 up ifconfig dummy0 1.2.3.4 On Ler 2: ifconfig eth0 10.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 10.0.0.255 up ifconfig dummy0 2.3.4.5 Second I add routes to virtual networks. On Ler 1: route add -net 78.1.1.0/24 gw 1.2.3.4 route add -net 78.1.2.0/24 gw 1.2.3.4 route add -net 79.1.1.0/24 gw 10.0.0.2 route add -net 79.1.2.0/24 gw 10.0.0.2 On Ler 2: route add -net 79.1.1.0/24 gw 2.3.4.5 route add -net 79.1.2.0/24 gw 2.3.4.5 route add -net 78.1.1.0/24 gw 10.0.0.1 route add -net 78.1.2.0/24 gw 10.0.0.1 Then I make shure the right labelspaces are associated: on Ler 1 and Ler 2: cd {your mpls dir}/utils ./mplsadm -L eth0:0 Then start Ldp on both LERs: On LER 1: ./ldp_linux add global 10.0.0.1 set trace 0xFFFFFFFF add interface eth0 On LER 2: ./ldp_linux add global 10.0.0.2 set trace 0xFFFFFFFF add interface eth0 Now I can not find information from mpls_*,except a line in mpls_in. And I find no MPLS packet have been transmitted.Whether without mpls_linux,the Ldp_linux only implement the label distribute? And I find only "hello" and "Keepalive" packet.Did the LSP establish? Li __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! http://auctions.yahoo.com |