[mpls-linux-general] regarding traffic engg...
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
jleu
From: <fr...@hs...> - 2002-01-15 10:04:38
|
Hi James, first of all let me take the opportunity to appreciate the efforts put in implementing mpls. Actually we want to simulate the traffic Engineering by setting up two LSP's between same HOST and DESTINATION. We want to do with transport layer port. For same DESTINATION , based on Tranport Layer port, we are trying to set up two LSP's. Actually here the problem is , for same fec, whichever binding info is given last is remaining in the rt->u.dst.dst_proto_data[AUX_PROTO_DATA_MPLS] = res->proto_data[AUX_PROTO_DATA_MPLS]; /* from route.c file : function :rt_set_nexthop */ I think due to this limitation, it is getting the recently configured NHLFE info , for same FEC's. mplsadm -v -A -B -O gen:20:eth1:ipv4:192.168.210.1 -f 192.168.206.12/32 mplsadm -v -A -B -O gen:21:ppp0:ipv4:192.168.210.1 -f 192.168.206.12/32 In the above case , for FEC 192.168.206.12 , it is always going through ppp0 interface. I have a doubt that information about "eth1" for 192.168.206.12/32 might be overlapping with "ppp0". as i noticed so many times , it is always going through "ppp0". If i do it in reverse order , it is doing vice versa. You are using platform based labelspace, for that can't we bind the same FEC to two different interfaces? can't we have more than one NHLFE for same FEC ? Please guide in this regard. Thanks in advance...... Best Regards, Faisal Rehman. ******************************************************************************** "This message is proprietary to Hughes Software Systmes Limited (HSS) and/or its customers and intended solely for the use of the individual or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged or confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please notify the originator immediately. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that you are strictly prohibited from using, copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of this message. HSS accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from the use of the information transimitted by this email including damage from virus." ******************************************************************************** |