[mpls-linux-general] Re: LDP (linux-port)
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
jleu
From: Paul N. <pau...@ya...> - 2001-12-12 16:38:13
|
Hi, Mr Thorsten, I appreciate the help provided. However, I do not quite understand your way of configuring the 2 PCs. This is what I have done.. maybe if u have the time, you can advice me further on the things I have missed out. I have just 2 Linux PCs joined together by a Ethernet cable. Both PCs have the most recent MPLS patch applied to kernel 2.4.13. To configure them, I performed these precise steps in the exact order as typed. a) LSR A: 1) ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.1 2) ifconfig lo 10.0.0.1 3) ip addr add 10.0.0.1/32 dev lo 4) ip route add 10.0.0.2/32 via 192.168.0.2 b) LSR B: 1) ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.2 2) ifconfig lo 10.0.0.2 3) ip addr add 10.0.0.2/32 dev lo 4) ip route add 10.0.0.1/32 via 192.168.0.1 c) LSR A: 1) Start ldp_linux. 2) add global 10.0.0.1 3) add interface eth0 d) LSR B: 1) Start ldp_linux. 2) add global 10.0.0.2 3) add interface eth0 On both PCs, I sniffed the line using Ethereal. I encountered the following problem. A session seemed to be established as show "database" and show "session" do produce some results. But when I tried to read the /proc/net/mpls_* files, they were all blank. I assume that means that no labels have been binded yet? I don't really know why. I will greatly appreciate any advice from you or anyone else who can help. Have been stuck at this for some time. BTW, has anyone come up with a more complete/reliable implementation of LDP, that may also support ATM LSRs? Thanks a lot in advance. Regards, Paul |