Re: [mpls-linux-general] MPLS in IP encapsulation
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
jleu
From: Sandeep S. <san...@it...> - 2001-10-31 05:34:56
|
Hi, I don't know much about GRE tunnels right now .But thanx anyway I can look into that and learn. Actually , I have already created a MPLS pkt in my own MPLS over ATM forwarding code. I actually need to do MPLS in IP encapsulation followed by encryption of the MPLS pkt by IPSEC. So I was wondering whether I could pass the skb containing my MPLS pkt to ip_queue_xmit(skb) in ip_output.c for wrapping the packet in IP . Am I getting it right and thinking along the correct lines ? Thanx. Sandeep. Sandeep Subramaniam Graduate Research Assistant ITTC, Raymond Nichols Hall, University of Kansas On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Steven Van den Berghe wrote: > You can use GRE tunnels to accomplish that. I think the latest > mpls-linux shouldn't have a problem with that. > Just create the tunnel over the IP network, and use the created > pseudo-device as a normal device. > > bye, > Steven > > Sandeep Subramaniam wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Has anyone tried to implement MPLS in IP encapsulation in the kernel? > > > > ie wrapping the MPLS pkt created at the ingress with an IP hdr. > > > > Any ideas ? > > > > Thanx. > > Sandeep. > > > > Sandeep Subramaniam > > Graduate Research Assistant > > ITTC, Raymond Nichols Hall, > > University of Kansas > > > > _______________________________________________ > > mpls-linux-general mailing list > > mpl...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general > > -- > Steven Van den Berghe > ste...@in... > Workgroup Broadband Communication Networks > Department Information Technology > Ghent University - Belgium > Phone: +32 (0)9 267 35 86 | Fax : +32 (0)9 267 35 99 > *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* > DiffServ over MPLS for Linux: http://dsmpls.atlantis.rug.ac.be > *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* > If engineers built buildings the way programmers wrote > programs, the first woodpecker to come along would > destroy civilization. > > *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* > > > |