Re: [mpls-linux-general] RSVP-TE available and reachable
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
jleu
From: <pim...@in...> - 2001-07-27 08:51:09
|
Dipak Biswas wrote: > Hi, > I've few questions. > (i) Which version of Redhat kernel should be best to use? 2.4.x: > x==? Best is Linus (!= Redhat) kernel 2.4.1 > (ii) I've 2.2.14 kernel Redhat 6.2 release running on Intel > PentiumIII Celeron processor in my machine. What kind of problem I may > face to compile and subsequently upgrade to 2.4.x? I dont know, look for RH specific sources of information (should be fairly easy to find) > (iii) The installation of iproute2 with its patch should be done > in which directory? does not matter > and, after compiling the new kernel, shouldn't "iproute2" be installed > as it's being installed in the case of "iptables" and its patch at > step 7? Please explain. Ok, step 7 should read: "Download iptables version 1.2, apply our patch ( help ) and install" > (iv) Reffering step 7, will not it be better to have common pool > of unused label for all the interfaces, so that when running MPLS over > other interfaces than ethernet > or increase in eth i/f to 4 and above, we need not think of > lebel.conf? yes, platform wide label spaces have certain advantages (although not always recommended e.g. ATM). I dont fully support the current design and certainly not the implementation (not part of our effort). However it does have a number of advantages: * you can setup the initial label in label.conf so that you always know who allocated a certain label (e.g. 3 figures per host, 1 figure per interface and 00, so 168100 is the first label on the first interface of the host abbreviated with 168) * you need a way to indicate on which interfaces MPLS is configured/allowed * easy to test running out of labels * it is not very difficult to change it to a global pool of labels for all interfaces (see rsvp_label.c) Pim. > > > Thanks in advance, > Dipak > > pim...@in... wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> OK, the new URL is ready: >> http://dsmpls.atlantis.rug.ac.be >> >> Can those people who had problems in the past test this URL and also >> check if the mailing list archives are reachable? >> >> Pim. >> >> -- >> Pim Van Heuven >> Ghent University - IMEC >> Department of Information Technology (INTEC) >> Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat, 41 >> B-9000, Gent, Belgium >> tel.: +32-(0)9267 3592, secr.: +32-(0)9267 3570 >> fax : +32-(0)9267 3599 >> e-mail : pim...@in... >> WWW : http://www.intec.rug.ac.be >> >> > -- Pim Van Heuven Ghent University - IMEC Department of Information Technology (INTEC) Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat, 41 B-9000, Gent, Belgium tel.: +32-(0)9267 3592, secr.: +32-(0)9267 3570 fax : +32-(0)9267 3599 e-mail : pim...@in... WWW : http://www.intec.rug.ac.be |