Re: [mpls-linux-devel] MPLS-Linux-1.955 FC5
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
jleu
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2007-03-09 05:08:06
|
Please include the output of: sho ip route from vtysh and: ip route show from the command line. On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 12:20:43PM +0100, Sienes Rodr?guez Gonzalo wrote: > Hi James! >=20 > I've just installed FC5 and all the MPLS-Linux-1.955 RPMs for this OS: >=20 > [root@PE1 ~]# rpm -qa | grep mpls | sort > ebtables-2.0.8-0.6.rc2.fc5.mpls.1.955 > glibc-kernheaders-3.0-5.2.fc5.mpls.1.955 > iproute-2.6.16-1.fc5.mpls.1.955 > iptables-1.3.5-1.2.fc5.mpls.1.955 > kernel-devel-2.6.18-1.2257.fc5.mpls.1.955 > kernel-smp-2.6.18-1.2257.fc5.mpls.1.955 > kernel-smp-devel-2.6.18-1.2257.fc5.mpls.1.955 > quagga-0.99.6-01.fc5.mpls.1.955 >=20 > [root@PE1 ~]# lsmod | grep mpls > mpls4 10240 0 >=20 > I try a simple environment with 2 LSRs: > =20 > eth0 eth1 eth1 eth0 > 12.0.0.1-------PE1---------------------PE2-------172.29.17.60 > .1 10.0.0.0/24 .2 >=20 > This is the configuration I made on PE1 by vtysh: >=20 > PE1# sh run > Building configuration... >=20 > Current configuration: > ! > hostname PE1 > ! > password root > enable password root > ! > interface eth0 > ipv6 nd suppress-ra > ! > interface eth1 > ipv6 nd suppress-ra > mpls ip > mpls labelspace 0 > ! > interface lo > ! > interface sit0 > ipv6 nd suppress-ra > ! > mpls ldp > egress connected > ! > ip forwarding > ! > line vty > ! >=20 > And the outputs of the commands relative to LDP: >=20 > PE1# sh ldp > LSR-ID: 12.0.0.1 Admin State: ENABLED > Transport Address: 0.0.0.0 > Control Mode: ORDERED Repair Mode: GLOBAL > Propogate Release: TRUE Label Merge: TRUE > Retention Mode: LIBERAL Loop Detection Mode: NONE > TTL-less-domain: FALSE > Local TCP Port: 646 Local UDP Port: 646 > Keep-alive Time: 45 Keep-alive Interval: 15 > Hello Time: 15 Hello Interval: 5 >=20 > PE1# sh ldp data > 10.0.0.0/24 local binding: label: gen 10002 > 10.0.0.0/24 remote binding: no outlabel lsr: 10.0.0.2:0 > 172.29.16.0/22 remote binding: no outlabel lsr: 10.0.0.2:0 > PE1# sh ldp dis >=20 > Local LSR Identifier: 12.0.0.1 >=20 > Interface Discovery Sources: > eth1: xmit/recv > LDP Id: 10.0.0.2:0 >=20 > Targeted Discovery Sources: > No configured peers >=20 > PE1# sh ldp fec > FEC: 1 10.0.0.0/24 > 1 0.0.0.0 1 > FEC: 4 172.29.16.0/22 >=20 > PE1# sh ldp neigh > Peer LDP Ident: 10.0.0.2:0; Local LDP Ident: 12.0.0.1:0 > TCP connection: 10.0.0.1.34306 - 10.0.0.2.36479 > State: OPERATIONAL; Msgs sent/recv: 63/191; UNSOLICITED > Up time: 00:14:38 > LDP discovery sources: > eth1 > Addresses bound to peer: > 172.29.17.60 10.0.0.2 >=20 > PE1# sh ldp ses > 4 10.0.0.2 45 OPERATIONAL > 172.29.17.60 > 10.0.0.2 >=20 > PE1# sh mpls har > MPLS-Linux: 1.955 netlink control >=20 > [root@PE1 ~]# mpls nhlfe > [root@PE1 ~]# mpls ilm > ILM entry label gen 10002 labelspace 0 proto ipv4 > pop peek (0 bytes, 0 pkts) >=20 > What I want to do is to send labelled packets while they are crossing 10.= 0.0.0/24. The problem is that LDP doesn't associate the labels that are dis= covered to the routes. >=20 > Where could I look at? >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Gonzalo. >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share y= our > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3D= DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-devel mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-devel --=20 James R. Leu jl...@mi... |