Re: [mpls-linux-devel] Current state of dst stacking on davem implementation

[Jamal H. S. <ha...@zn...>]

On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 02:22, Ramon Casellas wrote:

> > I thought the last conversation we had was to go with Daves code and
> > James' was going to be more bleeding edge and can keep feeding into
> > Daves. Did i misunderstand?
> 
> No, you didn't. Dave's is the stable and James' is the bleeding edge. When
> I say James dst stacking I refer to James patch to Dave's code regarding
> dst stacking. In this sense the dst stacking is the first "feed" to Dave's
> code. I don't get your point...

Ok, so we are on the same track then. I wasnt sure if that plan was
still on. 
BTW, can you extract this patch and send it to me?

> So, what's next?

I think we need to show some progress and just the dst stacking maybe
insufficient. Probably the easiest one is for me to submit the L2C patch
sans the MPLS bits to it since the bridging guys need to use that too. 
Thoughts?

cheers,
jamal