Re: [mpls-linux-devel] Current state of dst stacking on davem implementation

[Ramon C. <cas...@in...>]

On 18 Apr 2004, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:

> > lost right now. What's next? IIRC We had decided to have both stable/devel
> > branches and James had ported some of Dave's code to his trees...
> >
> > So what should I do? I had tested James changes to the dst stacking but I
> > don't recall having found a consensus of what was next
> >
>
> I thought the last conversation we had was to go with Daves code and
> James' was going to be more bleeding edge and can keep feeding into
> Daves. Did i misunderstand?

No, you didn't. Dave's is the stable and James' is the bleeding edge. When
I say James dst stacking I refer to James patch to Dave's code regarding
dst stacking. In this sense the dst stacking is the first "feed" to Dave's
code. I don't get your point...

So, what's next?
R.