[Motionmodeling-bugs] Re: [Fwd: Mailman results for Motionmodeling-devel]
Status: Alpha
Brought to you by:
sducas
From: <sd...@ne...> - 2005-02-24 11:31:23
|
Hi Buns, You're next questions are: >why stardard libs as mof.jar, jmi.jar, mdrapi.jar ... are in the uml14 >plugin (not in MM core) ?? aren't they common libs ? don't i need them >in the bpmn plugin ? There is two reasons: - The first is conceptual : the core is metamodel independent AND model ac= cess technology independant (JMI,MDR, javabeans...)... So the core code ha= s no dependencies toward thise libs... The best solution is to make a MDR specific plugin that UML14 one will be = depends on... - The second is technical: I already tried UML1.3 and UML1.4 at the begini= ng of MM development and MDR cause a bug when it's binary is common to UML= 13 and UML14 : some classes of UML13 has the same name of UML14 so when lo= ading an UML14 model you have a sort of CastException or IllegalClassExcep= tion... whereas the OSGI framework under eclipse garantee that if binaries= are not common the whole =22ClassPath=22 of the =22bundle=22 (look to OSG= I to know more about bundles...) so evrything is perfect... So for making so good solution describe above, we will have to modify MDR = (I already modified it for other stuffs...) so that he can handle OSGI cap= abilities and we can have a clean MOF/JMI and MDR specifics layers.... NEXT QUESTION : NEXT MESSAGE... ------------------------------------------------------------- NetCourrier, votre bureau virtuel sur Internet : Mail, Agenda, Clubs, Tool= bar... Web/Wap : www.netcourrier.com T=E9l=E9phone/Fax : 08 92 69 00 21 (0,34 =80 TTC/min) Minitel: 3615 NETCOURRIER (0,16 =80 TTC/min) |