From: Kenneth L. <ke...@la...> - 2005-07-19 02:27:55
|
At 10:54 18/07/05 +0200, you wrote: >El lun, 18-07-2005 a las 10:04 +0200, Christophe GRENIER escribi=C3=B3: > > On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Peter Holik wrote: > > > > >> Peter. Do you know why there are no newer Fedora RPMs of libjpeg-mmx? > > > > > > Sorry for answer delay i was on holiday. > > > > > > I'm using debian only so i can't answer you question. > > > > I don't know but I have successfully compiled libjpeg-mmx on an > > uptodate FC3 but it segfaults when using it. djpeg is an > > exemple shipped with the library. > >What version of libjpeg-mmx did you compile ? > >I've built a RPM and SRPM from lastest version of libjpeg-mmx ( 0.1.6 ) >without problems in my FC3 ( also a deb package in debian Sarge ). > >So maybe if Kenneth wants i can upload to SF motion page the source and >binary package for FC3 and also upload a FC4 packages. > >Cheers, >-- >Angel Carpintero >ack ( at ) telefonica ( dot ) net We can do that like I did originally with the xml-rpc-c lib. But I would actually like to find out if there is a serious reason why both= =20 Dag and other stopped making rpms for this library since FC2. Maybe the=20 lib is to bad quality? Maybe the mmx part is not important anymore with=20 newer jpeg libs? There must be a reason. Kenneth |