From: <pri...@gm...> - 2018-11-23 22:22:15
|
I have RTSP cameras from sony and they can do both HTTP and RTSP URL's. I suspect the comment from the manufacturer is misinformed. I would at least try the MJPEG url... On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 2:15 PM David Powell <da...@de...> wrote: > Yea, I saw that. I don't know where he came up with those, but I contacted > the manufacturer and they said RTSP was all it would do. > > David > On 11/23/18 2:10 PM, pri...@gm... wrote: > > A person on Amazon listed these URL's as usable for the camera: > > rtsp : / / admin:instar@IP-Address:RTSP-Port/11 - VLC Stream > > http : / / admin:instar@IP-Address:Port/iphone/11 - Quicktime Stream > > http :/ / IP-Address:Port/tmpfs/snap.jpg?usr=admin&pwd=instar - Snapshot > (720p / 1280x720 Pixel) > > http : / / IP-Address:Port/tmpfs/auto.jpg?usr=admin&pwd=instar - Snapshot > (352p or 176p) > > http : / / > IP-Address:Port/cgi-bin/hi3510/mjpegstream.cgi?-chn=11&-usr=admin&-pwd=instar > - MJPEG Stream > > > On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 11:48 AM David Powell <da...@de...> wrote: > >> Thanks for the insight. And thanks to Harlan for the tip on *mediainfo* >> - that's going to come in handy. >> >> I looked at the settings on the camera and the frame rate was set to 30 >> fps. Also, the media profile was set to highprofile. I changed the frame >> rate to 15 and the profile to "baseline". None of that lowered the CPU >> utilization. >> >> That camera actually has two streams, a primary and a secondary. The >> secondary has a 640x352 resolution. I set it to 15 fps and switched to >> that stream, and it did make a big difference; brought it down to about >> 125%. The picture is not as good of course, but I think I can live with >> that. >> >> Still, 125% is 2.5x the other three cameras combined, plus overhead. It >> seems to me that I should still be able to do *something* to bring it >> down under 100%. I can't believe that an RTSP stream takes that much more >> computational power. I want to add 4 more similar cameras once I figure >> this out. This is the one that I'm playing with: >> >> >> https://www.amazon.com/Security-Surveillance-Detection-Waterproof-4sdot/dp/B073TSN6YD/ref=sr_1_4 >> >> If you know of any similarly-priced cameras that support MJPEG I'd like a >> pointer to them! >> >> David >> >> >> >> On 11/23/18 11:26 AM, Colin Law wrote: >> >> On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 at 17:13, David Powell <da...@de...> <da...@de...> wrote: >> >> The resolution of the MJPEG ones are all 640x480. The RTSP one is 720p. >> >> I have framerate set to 15 in motion.conf. The individual camera config files do not have that setting. >> >> The MJPEG cameras are 307200 pixels, the RTSP is 921600 which is >> equivalent to all the others put together. Also the RTSP is probably >> providing the data at 25 or 30 frames/sec and the processor has to >> decode all of those even though you only want 15/sec in motion Mjpeg >> is a sequence of individual pictures so unwanted ones can just be >> thrown away. So yes, there is a lot more processing to be done for >> the RTSP camera before it even gets as far as motion. You may be able >> to slow down the frame rate in the camera, and also possibly the >> resolution if you don't need it all. >> >> >> David >> >> On 11/23/18 10:54 AM, Colin Law wrote: >> >> On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 at 16:53, Colin Law <cl...@gm...> <cl...@gm...> wrote: >> >> On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 at 16:43, David Powell <da...@de...> <da...@de...> wrote: >> >> I have 3 IP cameras configured in Motion running on a Raspberry Pi (Ubuntu). These cameras all use MJPEG streams and the CPU utilization on the Pi hovers around 50%. >> >> I added another camera which doesn't support MJPEG, but does support RTSP. Adding this one RTSP camera ran the CPU utilization up to around 200% (I believe this Pi has a quad-core CPU). Is this typical for RTSP? Is there any way to reduce the load for this protocol? I want to add several more cameras but cheap wireless outdoor IP cameras that support MJPEG seem to be hard to come by nowadays. >> >> What is the resolution of the mjpeg cameras and what is the rtsp one? >> >> Also what is frame rate of both? >> >> Colin >> >> David >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Motion-user mailing lis...@li...https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-userhttps://motion-project.github.io/ >> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Motion-user mailing lis...@li...https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-userhttps://motion-project.github.io/ >> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Motion-user mailing lis...@li...https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-userhttps://motion-project.github.io/ >> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Motion-user mailing lis...@li...https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-userhttps://motion-project.github.io/ >> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Motion-user mailing list >> Mot...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user >> https://motion-project.github.io/ >> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user > > > > _______________________________________________ > Motion-user mailing lis...@li...https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-userhttps://motion-project.github.io/ > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user > > _______________________________________________ > Motion-user mailing list > Mot...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user > https://motion-project.github.io/ > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user |