From: Fritiof H. <fr...@he...> - 2010-05-07 17:25:40
|
Hi John and Craig! I've did some testing yesterday and noticed that the CPU usage didn't went down as expected, when i call /detection/pause/ the CPU-usage remains the same (5fps 640x480 netcam, CPU usage about 20%). As you may notice, it's a quite slow machine (1GHz Intel P3), I got another rack mounted machine as well but that's to noisy to run in my home (If it's in the garage you could still hear it through the walls!). Is there any way to let motion NOT to do any motion-detection at all and rely on the camera it self? Many thanks, Fritiof On 5 May 2010 04:52, A. Craig West <acr...@gm...> wrote: > On 1 May 2010 17:43, Fritiof Hedman <fr...@he...> wrote: >> I wonder if there is some way to set one thread to start in "detection >> pause mode". >> Today I do this manually by running a script that calls >> http://127.0.0.1:8080/1/detection/pause (where 8080 is the >> control_port and 1 is the thread number) but I think that's >> unnessecary. I do this, because I use network cameras with built-in >> motion detection that calls a script that sets output_all on motion >> and sets that option to off when there's no motion again. >> >> This is to decrease the CPU usage, since I'm running Motion on a quite >> slow machine. > > Have you tried setting output_normal to off in the config file? that > is how I accomplish the same thing, although in my case I am starting > with output_all set to on. > -Craig > |