From: Paul <pa...@tu...> - 2007-10-15 17:08:59
|
Hi Michael On Monday 15 October 2007 15:39, Michael Bunk wrote: > Klaus Knopper found the bug, but didn't publish the source code yet (at > least I didn't find it). =A0I asked him on debian-knoppix to publish the > source code Reading the archives, I see you are now in possession of the latest source= =20 code.. ;) > > PS. moving to squash might indeed be a better idea in the long run. > > Why? =A0Is the compression ratio better, because it doesn't have to > compress file system data? =A0How much better? http://kerneltrap.org/files/PERFORMANCE.README.txt provides some illustrati= ve=20 figures to compare - Perhaps in time, when squashfs and/or cloop are merged= =20 in to the mainline kernel tree, maintainance & development will keep up to= =20 date rather than continually lagging behind (I see 2.6.23 is now "out"). Regards, Paul. |