From: Paul <pa...@tu...> - 2007-10-05 21:52:50
|
On Friday 05 October 2007 16:59, Michael Bunk wrote: > Do you or Alex have the status on a recent kernel? I have a *very* experimental 2.6.20 based base mod - Not suitable for gener= al=20 use as it was produced as a "proof of concept" and includes some unusual=20 patches.. > I have seen there is a basemod for 2.6.22: > http://morphix.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/morphix/trunk/mmaker/templates/= ba >semod-2.6.22.xml?view=3Dmarkup > > Does it work? =A0Yes, I could try it out by myself but no time now... :) Don't know - If Alex has a package ready, we can set Zathras up to autobuil= d=20 it. > Also, why does Morphix need a custom kernel at all? =A0Can't we use some > Debian kernel? =A0Don't the current kernels have cloop and unionfs as > modules in the .deb? As I understand it, cloop is deprecated in favour of squashfs, and unionfs = can=20 only be found in the -mm patchset - Some users also like the eyecandy=20 provided by the bootsplash patch. For my part, I have a couple of experimental patches that I try to sneak i= n=20 that would never be considered for a mainstream Debian build. Regards, Paul. |