From: Matt B. <gud...@ya...> - 2007-02-20 23:31:48
|
--- Matt Sgarlata <Mat...@wh...> wrote: > Wow, that looks fantastic! Morph has the ability to > do very complex > mappings between different types of objects, but it > is a pain in the > neck to set up. This looks like it would be very > friendly towards > people new to Morph and to former Dozer users in > particular. > I'm glad you like it. :) > I've also thought that perhaps it would be possible > to setup some type > of Morph XML Schema that would plug seamlessly into > Spring, but as you > mentioned, XML is rather clunky. > One thing that might work here is to implement a Spring 2.0 XML schema, but just use nested text (of the format I outlined) in a <morph:something> element. :) Have your cake and eat it too. -Matt B > Matt S [SNIP] ____________________________________________________________________________________ Have a burning question? Go to www.Answers.yahoo.com and get answers from real people who know. |