Re: [morph-developer] SimpleLanguageBeanReflector

[Matt S. <Mat...@wh...>]

Cool idea!  Where are you headed with this?

One thing I worry about is that we may be introducing circular 
dependencies.  Languages depend on converters which in turn depend on 
reflectors.  If we make a reflector that is dependent on a language I 
wonder if that could get us into trouble.

Matt S

Matt Benson wrote:
> I've just implemented a reflector over SimpleLanguage,
> which is of course itself implemented over the basic
> reflectors.  Trust me, this is going somewhere...
>
> Incidentally, the tests for
> SimpleLanguageBeanReflector implement the long-overdue
> testing of SimpleLanguage.set().  :)
>
> more later,
> Matt (B)
>
>
>
>  
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Need Mail bonding?
> Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.
> http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396546091
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> morph-developer mailing list
> mor...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/morph-developer
>
>