On 12-05-14 11:50 AM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we're thinking about replacing our SAN for KVM with a distributed FS
> like MooseFS.
>
> I'm running a small 4 machines MooseFS Cluster with 180GB SSD each and
> i'm not able to gain more performance than 77Mbit/s. Is this the limit?
> Is there a way to archieve higher throughput? I'm using bonding
> 2x1Gbit/s network cards.
>
> Greets
> Stefan
>
I have seen other posts by list members where having different mfs mount
instances for e.g. instead of a single mfsmount for /mfs that contains
/mfs/folder1 /mfs/folder2 have two mfsmount instances for
/mfs/folder1 and /mfs/folder2
this of course depends on if your storage is organized into discretely
mountable folders like this.
and i haven't bothered to try this either.
Another idea, if you want to reduce network latencies, to use 10GB
ethernet ? I am not convinced bonding 2xGB network links would improve
things enough to justify the complicated configuration.
|
