| 
     
      
      
      From: Zlatko Č. <zca...@bi...> - 2018-05-20 13:56:17
      
     
   | 
On 20.05.2018 11:33, Jakub Kruszona-Zawadzki wrote: > >> On 19 May 2018, at 18:42, Gandalf Corvotempesta >> <gan...@gm... >> <mailto:gan...@gm...>> wrote: >> >> il sab 19 mag 2018, 17:48 Marco Milano <mar...@gm... >> <mailto:mar...@gm...>> ha scritto: >> >> Tea Leaves :-) >> >> >> Seriously, where did you get this info? >> How HA works in moosefs? Is failover automatic? >> > > MooseFS 4.x now is in “close beta” (or even more “close > release-candidate”) stage. Currently we started to use it by > ourselves. When we will see that there are no obvious bugs then we > will release it as open-source product under GPL-v2 (or even GPL-v2+) > licence. > In the meantime if you want to participate in tests of MFS 4.x - > please let us know, we will send you packages of MFS 4.x for you OS. > > Marco Milano is one of our “testers” and this is why he knows more > about MFS 4.x > > HA in MFS 4.x works fully automatic. You just need to define group of > IP numbers in your DNS for your “mfsmaster” name. Then install master > servers and run them on machines with those IP numbers and thats it. > One of them will became “LEADER” of the group and other “FOLLOWER”-s > of the group. If for any reason “LEADER” goes down then one of the > FOLLOWER’s is chosen as an “ELECT” and when more than half of > chunkservers connects to it then it automatically switches to “LEADER” > state and starts working as main master server. When your previous > leader becomes available again then it usually joins the group as a > “FOLLOWER”. This is rather “fire and forget” solution. They will > synchronise metadata between them automatically, chunkservers and > clients will reconnect to current leader also automatically etc. > > Regards, > Jakub Kruszona-Zawadzki > > Hey Jakub! Such an excellent work on MooseFS, as always! Thank you for letting us know all these great news upfront! With new features announces, I really don't see how any other SDS competitor will be able to compete. Of course, I may be biased, running MooseFS for several years, but also being very happy with it all that time. Occassionaly, I tested other SDS solutions, but none were match for MooseFS. Last half a year, I've been successfully running MooseFS 3.0 as a Kubernetes deployment, and honestly I can't wait to see how new MooseFS 4.0 HA will fit that scheme. I expect lots of fun, in any case! Keep up the good work! -- Zlatko  |