From: Gandalf C. <gan...@gm...> - 2018-05-11 16:17:07
|
Il giorno ven 11 mag 2018 alle ore 17:10 Marco Milano <mar...@gm...> ha scritto: > And why would EC 8+2 be overkill ? I am assuming that you are at least using > 2 copies now, which means that if you had 1PB of real data, you will need 2PB > of raw disk space. If you use EC 8+2, you will need only 1.25PB of raw disk space > saving you 0.75PB of raw disk space and giving you the equivalent of 3 copies. > You pay less, you get more. :-) That's true for huge clusters. Our current test cluster is about 12TB and we have 6x2TB disk on each server. With EC 8+2 I need 10 servers, right ? Anyway, EC is for MFS4.0 Pro.... |