From: WK <wk...@bn...> - 2017-06-26 19:49:15
|
We have done so in an archive system, where the traffic doesn't have to be terribly responsive and tolerant to performance lags. Worked fine. It is really a resource issue. If the master has to compete with the chunkserver for RAM,cpu and disk i/o etc and/or you have lots of activity, then results are going to be uneven. -wk On 6/26/2017 10:38 AM, Warren Myers wrote: > > Use case: attaching multiple LUNs/NAS mounts/etc to a single server. > Want to use those multiple mounts as a failed-over file system using > MooseFS. > > > Can I run the master on the same server as the chunk - so that each > mount gets treated as a chunk, and the master distributes across them? > > > > *Warren Myers* > https://antipaucity.com > https://www.digitalocean.com/?refcode=d197a961987a > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > > _________________________________________ > moosefs-users mailing list > moo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/moosefs-users |