From: Nathan M. <nat...@gm...> - 2015-06-23 01:46:11
|
Hello, Is adding erasure coding a possibility in the future of MooseFS? I'd like more granularity in the efficiency of redundancy than just 0% redundancy (goal=1), 100% redundancy (goal=2), 200% redundancy (goal=3), etc... Particularly something more space saving than goal=2 but more safe than goal=1, something like 5 out of 6 file chunks must exist on network for file to be reconstructed (120% redundancy). Is this likely or would it constrain performance too much? Even so I imagine it could be added and not used by the more performance sensitive users. And obviously if in use one would want to set goal=1 as erasure coding would make replication of chunks pointless. I realize there are other filesystems with erasure builtin, but they all seem to lack the right amount of polish, stability and ease of use/setup that MooseFS seems to have. Thanks |