From: Ken <ken...@gm...> - 2012-04-24 06:29:39
|
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Davies Liu <dav...@gm...> wrote: > Maybe leveldb + MooseFS is better. Is this your mean? leveldb store url moosefs store photo > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Ken <ken...@gm...> wrote: >> >> We need to store tons of small files(photo), as noticed in faq, file >> count is limited in moosefs, I think bundle small files to a huge file >> maybe work. >> >> Write photos procedure like: >> allocate a huge file >> write head and photo content >> return (huge file, position, size) >> write another head and another photo >> return (huge file, position, size) >> ... >> >> Before read a photo, we should have enough information: huge file, >> position and length, the reading procedure is expected normally. >> >> To read a photo, we should provide an URL, like >> 'http://xxx.com/prefix/huge file/offset/size.jpg' >> >> And to be useful in WEB, build a fastcgi program for read/write access >> to the huge file. >> >> ps: >> * The matchup information photo and url should store outside of mooosefs. >> * Huge file size limited in 2G. >> * Huge file maybe cause race condition. >> >> Is there anyone interested in this? >> or better solution? >> >> -Ken >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Live Security Virtual Conference >> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >> _______________________________________________ >> moosefs-users mailing list >> moo...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/moosefs-users > > > > > -- > - Davies |