From: Steve T. <sm...@cb...> - 2012-03-30 17:41:53
|
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012, Ricardo J. Barberis wrote: > Do those drives happen to have 4 KB physical block size? > That combined with unaligned partitions could explain such bad performance. I always use whole disks combined into RAID sets via hardware raid, so partition alignment is not an issue, and then use ext4 file systems as chunk volumes. Raw I/O performance of the volumes are excellent, and indeed the I/O performance numbers shown by the MFS cgi script are also excellent (both read and write are greater than gigabit bandwidth). I use high-end Dell servers with 3+ GHz processors and dual bonded gigabit links for I/O, but nevertheless the resulting MFS I/O performance, which was good initially when I built a testing setup, has just plummeted with a real-world I/O load on it, to the point where I am getting a lot of complaints. This looks like a show stopper to me, which is somewhat upsetting. I'm not sure what I can do at this point to tune it further. Steve -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Steve Thompson, Cornell School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering smt AT cbe DOT cornell DOT edu "186,282 miles per second: it's not just a good idea, it's the law" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |