From: Allen L. <lan...@gm...> - 2011-11-11 13:43:04
|
Sure, that's the "right way" to do it. You can run the metalogger anywhere you want, but it shouldn't be "integrated" with the chunk server as the OP seemed to be asking for. On 11/10/2011 7:01 PM, wkmail wrote: > On 11/10/2011 12:42 PM, Allen Landsidel wrote: >> That would really bone a lot of configs, hardware config wise. >> >> My chunk servers all run with 512M of RAM, not the 16G or whatever I >> have in the master and the metalogger. It's "proper" that the >> chunkserver does the chunk serving job, and the metalogger does the >> metalogging job, and that the two aren't all mixed up into a single >> process/service. >> >> > > We run the Metalogger process on one of our stronger chunkservers IN > ADDITION to a defined Meta Logger machine thats setup for a backup. > > We figure, having an extra copy of the metadata can't hurt and if its > not impacting the chunkerserver ..... > > -bill > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > moosefs-users mailing list > moo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/moosefs-users |