From: Ricardo J. B. <ric...@da...> - 2011-03-03 22:04:21
|
El Jue 03 Marzo 2011, randall escribió: > On 03/02/2011 11:40 AM, Michal Borychowski wrote: > > The main purpose of MooseFS system is security not the space savings. And > > solution with RAID6 is not that secure. We generally advise not to use > > any RAIDs and using at least goal=2. > > Wondering about this. > > when no raid and goal=2, this would mean when using multiple disks per > server that each disk would be a seperate chunk location. > > Can see the use of this when you use 1 single server as each copy would > reside on 2 seperate disks so you are somewhat protected against disk > failure. I don't think so, goal=2 means one chunk in each chunkserver. If you have only one chunckserver your files would be undergoal, though I'm not sure if one chunkserver alone is treated diferently. > but when you have 2 servers with each 12 disks (24 chunk locations), > does each chunk reside on 2 seperate servers giving protection against > server failure? Exactly. You can see where each chunk is located with mfsfileinfo /path/to/file. Regards, -- Ricardo J. Barberis Senior SysAdmin / ITI Dattatec.com :: Soluciones de Web Hosting Tu Hosting hecho Simple! |