From: Samuel H. O. N. <sam...@ol...> - 2011-02-23 10:57:25
|
Hi Michal, Thanks for your message. We will share our configuration and description in the page "Who is using MooseFS" asap. I have a first question, our system requires per-user quota (or per-directory quota) but since we deploy MooseFS we did not find any "lighty" solution to do this. Have you any advice for us? Because it is an important part of our service. Regards. Samuel Hassine Le 23/02/2011 09:53, Michal Borychowski a écrit : > Hi Samuel! > > We feel very very happy that MooseFS meets your needs and expectations when > talking about a reliable distributed filesystem! :) > > It would be nice if you could share your system configuration and > description at our "Who is using MooseFS" webpage: > http://www.moosefs.org/who-is-using-moosefs.html > > Also you may like to share your experiences with setting up the system with > other users. > > > Kind regards > Michał Borychowski > MooseFS Support Manager > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > Gemius S.A. > ul. Wołoska 7, 02-672 Warszawa > Budynek MARS, klatka D > Tel.: +4822 874-41-00 > Fax : +4822 874-41-01 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Samuel Hassine, Olympe Network > [mailto:sam...@ol...] > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 2:14 AM > To: moo...@li... > Cc: Yann Autissier, Another Service > Subject: [Moosefs-users] MooseFS, our Savior! > > Hi all, > > I just want to say to the MooseFS team that they are simply awesome. > Since one year, we try to create a new concept of a full Open Source > Cloud Architecture "over datacenters". > > We start with a public cloud service and private clouds for our > customers but, since 5 years, we also own a free web hosting service, > without any ads, just to defend some values we think important for the > Internet. > > In november, after multiple months of work, we launched a new version > (4.0) with our cloud solution and, of course, for free. If all the > bricks we are using are very efficient (Proxmox with OpenVZ and KVM > virtual engines, load balancers and routing policies avoiding SPOF, > Zenoss and AI scripting, Gearman inter-apps worker and LDAP directories > for cloud management and automatic self-heal), the filesystem was just > not equal to the task. > > To not quote its name, GlusterFS, because we want a solution without any > SPOF. But we encoutered errors during replication, files in bad state, > undeletable data etc... And each day, our partition freezes without any > trace in log files... > > However, since we deploy MooseFS in production, for approximately 20 000 > websites and 10 000 databases (8TB of storage, with 10 billions of files > and directories), there is not any problem at all. > > Thank you to the MooseFS team, we hope we will be able to help you when > we could. And we are attending the directory quota feature in 1.7 version :) > > Thanks again. > > Best regards. > |