Re: [Moosefs-users] Priority recovering goals

[Fabien G. <fab...@gm...>]

Hi Jose,

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:37 PM, jose maria <let...@us...> wrote:
>
>  The result is that for 10 hours that has taken in provide valid copies,
> the cluster is vulnerable to loss of information before a disc mistake,
> I believe that of being possible it would be necessary to implement an
> absolute priority in the regenerate of copies cost those files that stay
> with 1 valid copy.

As Michal explained a few days ago on this list (see "Message-ID:
<00d901cb9852$fefb3f90$fcf1beb0$@bor...@ge...>") :

"But please remember that this process takes quite a long time (it may
be 2-3 weeks). Performance is the most important thing for the system,
not rebalancing."


Fabien